{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,11]],"date-time":"2026-01-11T15:58:50Z","timestamp":1768147130396,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,5,31]],"date-time":"2009-05-31T04:16:58Z","timestamp":1243743418000},"page":"65-70","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Relevance of new recommendations on routine antenatal prevention of rhesus immunization: An appraisal based on a retrospective analysis of all cases observed in two French administrative areas of 3 million inhabitants"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"146","author":[{"given":"St\u00e9phanie","family":"Boulet","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Claire","family":"Krause","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Herv\u00e9","family":"Tixier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marc","family":"Bardou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Sagot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib1","unstructured":"Text of the guidelines for prevention of fetomaternal rhesus-D allo-immunization. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2006 Feb;35(1 Suppl):1S131-5."},{"issue":"February (1 Suppl.)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib2","first-page":"1S93","article-title":"Comparison of the efficacy of different methods for the prevention of anti-D allo-immunization during pregnancy: targeted strategy limited to risk situations or associated with systematic prevention in the 3rd trimester","volume":"35","author":"Parant","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Controlled trial of various anti-D dosages in suppression of Rh sensitization following pregnancy. Report to the Medical Research Council by the working party on the use of anti-D-immunoglobulin for the prevention of isoimmunization of Rh-negative women during pregnancy. Br Med J 1974 April 13;2(5910):75\u201380.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.2.5910.75"},{"issue":"November (Suppl. 18)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10286.x","article-title":"The scientific basis of antenatal prophylaxis","volume":"105","author":"Urbaniak","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"February (1 Suppl.)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib5","first-page":"1S104","article-title":"Economic analysis of the prevention of anti-D immunization","volume":"35","author":"Ravinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"February (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib6","first-page":"337","article-title":"Prevention of Rh(D) alloimmunization: a cost-benefit analysis","volume":"142","author":"Baskett","year":"1990","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"issue":"September (9)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00226.x","article-title":"The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative","volume":"111","author":"Chilcott","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"July (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<319::AID-HEC211>3.0.CO;2-6","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of antenatal anti-D prophylaxis","volume":"5","author":"Vick","year":"1996","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib9","unstructured":"Health and Social Statistics for Burgundy and Franche-Comt\u00e9. www.sante.gouv.fr\/drees\/statiss. 2007. Ref Type: Internet Communication."},{"issue":"February (1 Suppl.)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib10","first-page":"1S123","article-title":"Prevention of fetomaternal rhesus-D allo-immunization. Practical aspects","volume":"35","author":"Cortey","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"September (9)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib11","first-page":"765","article-title":"Prevention of Rh alloimmunization","volume":"25","author":"Fung Kee","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib12","first-page":"290","article-title":"Foetal-maternal erythrocyte incompatibilities. Blood transfusion: security approach","author":"Brossard","year":"2000","journal-title":"John Libbey Eurotext ed"},{"issue":"December (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-3148.1999.00217.x","article-title":"Monitoring the clearance of fetal RhD-positive red cells in FMH following RhD immunoglobulin administration","volume":"9","author":"Lubenko","year":"1999","journal-title":"Transfus Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib14","unstructured":"French National Institute on Statistics and Economic Studies. Institut National de la Statistique et des \u00c9tudes Economiques. www.insee.fr. 2007. Ref Type: Internet Communication."},{"issue":"January (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00789.x","article-title":"The kinetics of routine antenatal prophylactic intramuscular injections of polyclonal anti-D immunoglobulin","volume":"113","author":"MacKenzie","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"January (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib16","first-page":"39","article-title":"Pharmacokinetics of anti-D IgG in pregnant RhD-negative women","volume":"110","author":"Bichler","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"August (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/S0887-7963(87)70010-8","article-title":"Failures of intravenous Rh immune globulin prophylaxis: an analysis of the reasons for such failures","volume":"1","author":"Bowman","year":"1987","journal-title":"Transfus Med Rev"},{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91068-N","article-title":"Postinjection kinetics of antepartum Rh immune globulin","volume":"163","author":"Witter","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib19","unstructured":"Health technology Appraisal.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Pregnancy-routine anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus negative women. 2007. Ref Type: Internet Communication."},{"issue":"July (7)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00988.x","article-title":"Compliance with routine antenatal rhesus D prophylaxis and the impact on sensitisations: observations over 14 years","volume":"113","author":"MacKenzie","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"June (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(06)76409-2","article-title":"Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France between 1995 and 2003: results from the National Perinatal Surveys","volume":"35","author":"Blondel","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"October (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.033","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping from maternal blood \u2013 a meta-analysis","volume":"195","author":"Geifman-Holtzman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211509003133?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211509003133?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:21:19Z","timestamp":1759555279000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211509003133"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211509003133"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Relevance of new recommendations on routine antenatal prevention of rhesus immunization: An appraisal based on a retrospective analysis of all cases observed in two French administrative areas of 3 million inhabitants","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}