{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,5]],"date-time":"2025-10-05T00:28:29Z","timestamp":1759624109274,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,1]],"date-time":"2010-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1272672000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,1]],"date-time":"2010-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1272672000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,2,25]],"date-time":"2010-02-25T05:46:24Z","timestamp":1267076784000},"page":"47-51","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A comparison between monophasic levonorgestrel\u2013ethinyl estradiol 150\/30 and triphasic levonorgestrel\u2013ethinyl estradiol 50\u201375\u2013125\/30\u201340\u201330 contraceptive pills for side effects and patient satisfaction: A study in Iran"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"150","author":[{"given":"Maryam","family":"Kashanian","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Farangis","family":"Shahpourian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Omolbanin","family":"Zare","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)02927-2","article-title":"Triphasic oral contraceptives: review and comparison of various regimens","volume":"77","author":"Cedars","year":"2002","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib2","first-page":"158","article-title":"OC practice guidelines: minimizing side effects","volume":"42","author":"Damey","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00108-6","article-title":"Efficacy, cycle control and safety of a triphsic desogestrel\/ethinyl estradiol and ortho- Novum 7\/7\/7 (triphasic norethindrone\/ethinyl estradiol): a randomized clinical trial","volume":"61","author":"Kaunitz","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(94)90106-6","article-title":"New progestogens in oral contraception","volume":"49","author":"Fotherby","year":"1994","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(92)90128-G","article-title":"Triphasic combination of ethinyl estradiol and gestodene. Long-term clinical trial","volume":"46","author":"Weber-Diehl","year":"1992","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"year":"2005","series-title":"Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility","author":"Speroff","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib6"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004317.pub2","article-title":"Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods for contraception","author":"Halpern","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.01.002","article-title":"Hormonal contraceptive discontinuation patterns according to formulation: investigation of associations in an administrative claims database","volume":"77","author":"Murphy","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.07.010","article-title":"Scheduled and unscheduled bleeding patterns with two combined hormonal contraceptives: application of new recommendations for standardization","volume":"92","author":"Hampton","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.3109\/13625189909064008","article-title":"A comparison of cycle control with monophasic levonorgestrel\/ethinylestradiol 100micrograms\/20micrograms versus triphasic norethindrone\/ethinylestradiol 500\u2013750\u20131000micrograms\/35micrograms: a multicenter, randomized, open-label study","volume":"4","author":"Chavez","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"July","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003553.pub2","article-title":"Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception","volume":"3","author":"Van Vliet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"July","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003553.pub2","article-title":"Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception","volume":"3","author":"Van Vliet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.02.007","article-title":"Bleeding patterns with monophasic and triphasic low-dose ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptives","volume":"77","author":"Hampton","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000260956.61835.6d","article-title":"Oral contraceptive tolerance: dose the type of pill matter?","volume":"109","author":"Moreau","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.062","article-title":"Enhancing oral contraceptive success: the potential of new formulations","volume":"190","author":"Kaunitz","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211510000448?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211510000448?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:22:14Z","timestamp":1759555334000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211510000448"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211510000448"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A comparison between monophasic levonorgestrel\u2013ethinyl estradiol 150\/30 and triphasic levonorgestrel\u2013ethinyl estradiol 50\u201375\u2013125\/30\u201340\u201330 contraceptive pills for side effects and patient satisfaction: A study in Iran","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.01.010","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}