{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T07:09:44Z","timestamp":1789542584455,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,1]],"date-time":"2011-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1304208000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,1]],"date-time":"2011-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1304208000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,23]],"date-time":"2011-01-23T04:19:06Z","timestamp":1295756346000},"page":"35-40","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Use of peripartum ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram without blood sampling: a large prospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"156","author":[{"given":"Muriel","family":"Doret","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mona","family":"Massoud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Constans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pascal","family":"Gaucherand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-9514(14)60183-5","article-title":"The epidemiology and causes of cerebral palsy","volume":"49","author":"Reddihough","year":"2003","journal-title":"Aust J Physiother"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199603073341001","article-title":"Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy","volume":"334","author":"Nelson","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0015","first-page":"CD006066","article-title":"Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour","volume":"3","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0020","first-page":"285","article-title":"Predictive value of electronic fetal monitoring for intrapartum fetal asphyxia with metabolic acidosis","volume":"93","author":"Low","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05703-8","article-title":"Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial","volume":"358","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90273-L","article-title":"Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases","volume":"169","author":"Westgate","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x","article-title":"A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography\u2014a randomised controlled study","volume":"113","author":"Ojala","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"299","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0040","first-page":"e1","article-title":"A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor","volume":"197","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181dfffd6","article-title":"Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"115","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0050","first-page":"CD000116","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour","volume":"3","author":"Neilson","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.4.260.266","article-title":"ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labor: nordic observational multicenter study","volume":"12","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1202","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01480.x","article-title":"Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital","volume":"114","author":"Doria","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001727404","article-title":"STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients","volume":"15","author":"Kwee","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.108","article-title":"STAN in clinical practice\u2013the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Gothenburg","volume":"195","author":"Noren","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"546","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0075","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Reduced prevalence of metabolic acidosis at birth: an analysis of established STAN usage in the total population of deliveries in a Swedish district hospital","volume":"202","author":"Noren","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance","volume":"114","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2004.121","article-title":"Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG. A multi-center, observational study","volume":"32","author":"Luttkus","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.008","article-title":"Fetal ECG waveform analysis","volume":"18","author":"Rosen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050701580564","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: an observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon","volume":"20","author":"Massoud","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0100","first-page":"8","article-title":"Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring","volume":"25","author":"Roth","year":"1987","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.3109\/00365517109080214","article-title":"An acid\u2013base chart for arterial blood with normal and pathophysiological reference areas","volume":"27","author":"Siggaard-Andersen","year":"1971","journal-title":"Scand J Clin Lab Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1544","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02711.x","article-title":"A new tool for the validation of umbilical cord acid\u2013base data","volume":"117","author":"Kro","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01649.x","article-title":"Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis. Author's reply","volume":"115","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02645.x","article-title":"Access to computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocographs improves clinicians\u2019 prediction of newborn umbilical artery blood pH","volume":"117","author":"Costa","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02204.x","article-title":"Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN","volume":"116","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802023053","article-title":"Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies","volume":"87","author":"Ojala","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01758.x","article-title":"Fetal monitoring\u2014a risky business for the unborn and for clinicians","volume":"115","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01648.x","article-title":"Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis","volume":"115","author":"Ugwumadu","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02269.x","article-title":"Metabolic acidosis at birth and suboptimal care\u2013illustration of the gap between knowledge and clinical practice","volume":"116","author":"Jonsson","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211511000236?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211511000236?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:24:27Z","timestamp":1759555467000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211511000236"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211511000236"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Use of peripartum ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram without blood sampling: a large prospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}