{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T15:08:01Z","timestamp":1788880081314,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,15]],"date-time":"2011-08-15T05:09:30Z","timestamp":1313384970000},"page":"276-281","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"159","author":[{"given":"Greg A.","family":"Pearson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brenda","family":"Kelly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robin","family":"Russell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Susan","family":"Dutton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jenny J.","family":"Kurinczuk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ian Z.","family":"MacKenzie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0005","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists\/Royal College of Anaesthetists, Good Practice Guideline No.11. Classification of urgency of caesarean section \u2013 a continuum of risk. London: RCOG Press; April 2010. http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/classification-of-urgency-of-caesarean-section-good-practice-10."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0010","unstructured":"National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health\/NICE. Caesarean section. London: RCOG Press; 2004."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680009300703","article-title":"Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification","volume":"93","author":"Lucas","year":"2000","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1334","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7298.1334","article-title":"Prospective 12 month study of 30min decision to delivery intervals for \u201cemergency\u201d caesarean","volume":"322","author":"MacKenzie","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0025","first-page":"498","article-title":"What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries","volume":"109","author":"MacKenzie","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1330","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7298.1330","article-title":"Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean sectionare current standards achievable? Observational case series","volume":"322","author":"Tuffnell","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600955768","article-title":"The 30min decision-to-delivery interval for 'urgent\u2019 caesarean sections: an elusive target","volume":"26","author":"Moriarty","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0040","first-page":"505","article-title":"The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30min a realistic target?","volume":"109","author":"Helmy","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224693.07785.14","article-title":"Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes","volume":"108","author":"Bloom","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211245","article-title":"Cord gas analysis, decision-to-delivery interval, and the 30-min rule for emergency caesareans","volume":"25","author":"Holcroft","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90269-X","article-title":"Acid\u2013base status at birth and neurodevelopmental outcome at four and one-half years","volume":"161","author":"Dennis","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8270","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(82)91462-3","article-title":"Do Apgar scores indicate asphyxia?","volume":"1","author":"Sykes","year":"1982","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)90245-3","article-title":"The validity of the Apgar scores in the assessment of asphyxia at birth","volume":"54","author":"Mangaro","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0070","unstructured":"Surman G, Newdick H, King A, Davenport H, Kurinczuk JJ. 4Child: four counties database of cerebral palsy, vision loss and hearing loss in children. Annual report 2009, including data for births 1984 to 2003. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford. Available from: http:\/\/www.npeu.ox.ac.uk\/4child\/annualreport [accessed April 2010]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38031.775845.7C","article-title":"National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section","volume":"328","author":"Thomas","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0080","first-page":"1348","article-title":"Indications for caesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on aspects of cesarean birth","volume":"134","author":"Hannah","year":"1986","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0085","unstructured":"Maternal & Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. 7th annual report; 2000. p. 41\u201352."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0090","unstructured":"NHS Litigation Authority. Clinical negligence scheme for trusts: maternity clinical risk management standards 2009\/10. Version 2; 2010. p. 1\u2013147. http:\/\/www.nhsla.com\/RiskManagement\/."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13263.x","article-title":"Decision to delivery intervals for assisted vaginal vertex delivery","volume":"107","author":"Okunwobi-Smith","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0100","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section audit report. London: RCOG Press; 2001. http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/orca\/audit\/completed-audits."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x","article-title":"Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid\u2013base status: a meta-analysis","volume":"60","author":"Reynolds","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211511004659?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211511004659?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T14:26:54Z","timestamp":1788877614000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211511004659"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211511004659"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}