{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T13:06:33Z","timestamp":1772802393245,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,16]],"date-time":"2011-12-16T00:31:05Z","timestamp":1323995465000},"page":"45-50","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Outcome and feasibility of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy for the first and second IVF\/ICSI attempts"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"160","author":[{"given":"A.-S.","family":"Gremeau","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Brugnon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Z.","family":"Bouraoui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Pekrishvili","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Janny","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.-L.","family":"Pouly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep035","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)","volume":"24","author":"Nyboe Andersen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199808273390901","article-title":"Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization","volume":"339","author":"Templeton","year":"1998","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0015","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology surveillance\u2014United States, 2000","volume":"52","author":"Wright","year":"2003","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1158","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh755","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE","volume":"20","author":"Andersen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1071\/RD04101","article-title":"Fetal programming: the perspective of single and twin pregnancies","volume":"17","author":"Davies","year":"2005","journal-title":"Reprod Fertil Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmi027","article-title":"IVF\/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention","volume":"11","author":"Pinborg","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2004.00279.x","article-title":"Maternal risks and perinatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 1005 twin pregnancies: the role of in vitro fertilization","volume":"83","author":"Pinborg","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37957.560278.EE","article-title":"Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies","volume":"328","author":"Helmerhorst","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg081","article-title":"Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting","volume":"18","author":"Land","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.9.2392","article-title":"Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth","volume":"14","author":"Vilska","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.10.2581","article-title":"Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"14","author":"Gerris","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1449","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg301","article-title":"Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate","volume":"18","author":"Tiitinen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1364","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh197","article-title":"Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles","volume":"19","author":"Martikainen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1900","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.9.1900","article-title":"One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study","volume":"16","author":"Martikainen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh672","article-title":"Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"20","author":"Lukassen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0080","article-title":"Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers","author":"Fauque","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization","volume":"351","author":"Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0090","first-page":"CD003416","article-title":"Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection","author":"Pandian","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0095","article-title":"The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis","author":"Gelbaya","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh744","article-title":"Single embryo transfer: a mini-review","volume":"20","author":"Bergh","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61441-1","article-title":"Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI","volume":"13","author":"Le Lannou","year":"2006","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2007.12.004","article-title":"Prospective evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience","volume":"36","author":"Leniaud","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.1.175","article-title":"A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos","volume":"15","author":"Edgar","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2006.07.010","article-title":"Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification","volume":"34","author":"Vanderzwalmen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0125","first-page":"0","article-title":"Cumulative pregnancy rates after single cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a randomized and prospective study. 26th annual meeting of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (Rome)","volume":"Suppl. 1","author":"Brugnon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2633","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del247","article-title":"Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer","volume":"21","author":"De Sutter","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0135","first-page":"319","article-title":"Single embryo transfer (set) not only leads to a reduction in twinning rates after IVF\/ICSI, but also improves obstetrical and perinatal outcome of singletons","volume":"68","author":"De Sutter","year":"2006","journal-title":"Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei424","article-title":"The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneous conceived babies","volume":"21","author":"De Neubourg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60818-8","article-title":"Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome","volume":"10","author":"Gordts","year":"2005","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0150","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology surveillance\u2014United States, 2006","volume":"58","author":"Sunderam","year":"2009","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh097","article-title":"The desire for multiple pregnancy in male and female infertility patients","volume":"19","author":"Child","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01396.x","article-title":"Safety versus success in elective single embryo transfer: women's preferences for outcomes of in vitro fertilisation","volume":"114","author":"Scotland","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2036","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den156","article-title":"Why don\u2019t we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals","volume":"23","author":"van Peperstraten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.065","article-title":"Acceptance of single-embryo transfer by patients","volume":"87","author":"Coetzee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2718","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den327","article-title":"Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey","volume":"23","author":"van Peperstraten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0180","article-title":"Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study","author":"Hope","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1314","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.11.052","article-title":"A case study of the applicability of a prediction model for the selection of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for single embryo transfer in another center","volume":"87","author":"Hunault","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211511005471?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211511005471?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:24:59Z","timestamp":1759555499000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211511005471"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211511005471"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Outcome and feasibility of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy for the first and second IVF\/ICSI attempts","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.032","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}