{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T04:08:24Z","timestamp":1767845304508,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,1]],"date-time":"2013-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1372636800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,1]],"date-time":"2013-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1372636800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,17]],"date-time":"2013-04-17T04:40:45Z","timestamp":1366173645000},"page":"197-201","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Factors that influence the incision-delivery interval at caesarean section and the impact on the neonate: a prospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"169","author":[{"given":"Greg A.","family":"Pearson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ian Z.","family":"MacKenzie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0005","first-page":"1348","article-title":"Indications for caesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth","volume":"134","author":"Hannah","year":"1986","journal-title":"Canadian Medical Association Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0010","unstructured":"Confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Focus Group. Anaesthetic anaesthesia delays and complications. 7th Annual Report, London: Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium; 2000, pp. 41\u201352"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0015","first-page":"1","article-title":"Opinion committee on obstetric practice optimal goals for anaesthesia care in obstetrics","volume":"97","author":"Committee ACOG","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0020","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press; 2001, http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/orca\/audit\/completed-audits."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0025","unstructured":"NHS Litigation Authority. Clinical negligence scheme for trusts: maternity clinical risk management standards 2009\/10. Version 2:1-147; 2010. http:\/\/www.nhsla.com\/RiskManagement\/."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38031.775845.7C","article-title":"National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section","volume":"328","author":"Thomas","year":"2004","journal-title":"British Medical Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0035","first-page":"498","article-title":"What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries","volume":"109","author":"MacKenzie","year":"2002","journal-title":"British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044","article-title":"Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up","volume":"159","author":"Pearson","year":"2011","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1330","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7298.1330","article-title":"Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean sectionare current standards achievable? Observational case series","volume":"322","author":"Tuffnell","year":"2001","journal-title":"British Medical Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0050","series-title":"Caesarean Section","author":"National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health\/NICE","year":"2004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90269-X","article-title":"Acid-base status at birth and neurodevelopmental outcome at four and one-half years","volume":"161","author":"Dennis","year":"1989","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.2307\/2094540","article-title":"The hawthorne experiments: first statistical interpretation","volume":"43","author":"Franke","year":"1978","journal-title":"American Sociological Review"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2008.04.003","article-title":"Red, orange and green Caesarean sections: a new communication tool for on-call obstetricians","volume":"140","author":"Dupuis","year":"2008","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004453.pub2","article-title":"Abdominal surgical incision for caesarean section","author":"Mathai","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0075","article-title":"Do adhesions at repeat caesarean delay delivery of the newborn?","author":"Greenberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0080","first-page":"331","article-title":"Neonatal effect of prolonged anesthetic induction for cesarean section","volume":"58","author":"Datta","year":"1981","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)90077-9","article-title":"Emergency caesarean section during labour: response times and type of anaesthesia","volume":"54","author":"Quinn","year":"1994","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000237116.72011.f3","article-title":"Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Alexander","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/48.7.661","article-title":"A further study of general anaesthesia for Caesarean section","volume":"48","author":"Crawford","year":"1976","journal-title":"British Journal of Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/54.10.1015","article-title":"Status of neonates delivered by elective Caesarean section","volume":"54","author":"Crawford","year":"1982","journal-title":"British Journal of Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0105","first-page":"23","article-title":"Incision-to-delivery interval and neonatal wellbeing during cesarean section","volume":"60","author":"Fontanarosa","year":"2008","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecologica"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.07.022","article-title":"The effect of time intervals on neonatal outcome in elective caesarean delivery at term under regional anaesthesia","volume":"111","author":"Maayan-Metzger","year":"2010","journal-title":"International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999791","article-title":"Neonatal status in relation to incision intervals, obstetric factors, and anesthesia at cesarean delivery","volume":"4","author":"Andersen","year":"1987","journal-title":"American Journal of Perinatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0120","first-page":"600","article-title":"Maternal and fetal catecholamines and uterine incision-to-delivery interval during elective cesarean","volume":"75","author":"Bader","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0125","first-page":"1059","article-title":"Neonatal outcome in cesarean section under general anesthesia, related to gestational age, induction-delivery and uterus-delivery intervals","volume":"19","author":"Vatashsky","year":"1983","journal-title":"Israel Journal of Medical Sciences"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224693.07785.14","article-title":"Decision-to-Incision times and maternal and infant outcomes","volume":"108","author":"Bloom","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.01.032","article-title":"Evaluating the decision-to-delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections","volume":"116","author":"Sayegh","year":"2004","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1163","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340903214932","article-title":"Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during caesarean section in advanced labor: convetional method versus reverse breech extraction","volume":"88","author":"Chopra","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2004.152","article-title":"Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during caesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia","volume":"32","author":"Blickstein","year":"2004","journal-title":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(96)02817-2","article-title":"Breech extraction \u2013 an alternative method of delivering a deeply engaged head at cesarean section","volume":"56","author":"Fong","year":"1997","journal-title":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.09.014","article-title":"Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during cesarean section","volume":"121","author":"Levy","year":"2005","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00594-2","article-title":"Nitroglycerin to facilitate fetal extraction during cesarean delivery","volume":"91","author":"David","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211513001097?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211513001097?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:29:11Z","timestamp":1759555751000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211513001097"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211513001097"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Factors that influence the incision-delivery interval at caesarean section and the impact on the neonate: a prospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.021","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}