{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T15:22:49Z","timestamp":1790436169779,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":64,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,1]],"date-time":"2014-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1401580800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,1]],"date-time":"2014-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1401580800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,20]],"date-time":"2014-03-20T00:45:31Z","timestamp":1395276331000},"page":"1-10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":64,"special_numbering":"C","title":["A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"177","author":[{"given":"Anna-Maija","family":"Tapper","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mikko","family":"Hannola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rainer","family":"Zeitlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jaana","family":"Isoj\u00e4rvi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Harri","family":"Sintonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tuija S.","family":"Ikonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003677.pub4","article-title":"Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease","author":"Nieboer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0010","first-page":"1823","article-title":"Muuttuva kohdunpoisto[[n]]]The changing hysterectomy","volume":"127","author":"Brummer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Duodecim"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0015","first-page":"1864","article-title":"Robotti gynekologisessa kirurgiassa","volume":"127","author":"Pakarinen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Duodecim"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0020","unstructured":"ACOG Committee Opinion: statement on robotic surgery by ACOG President James T. Breeden. March 14, 2013. www.acog.org."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.03.003","article-title":"Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery","volume":"16","author":"Advincula","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-007-0021-2","article-title":"A history of robots: from science fiction to surgical robotics","volume":"1","author":"Hockstein","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Robotic Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31822b46f6","article-title":"Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy on skill acquisition and performance","volume":"54","author":"Kho","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1142","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182166055","article-title":"Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy: effect on cost and complications","volume":"117","author":"Jonsdottir","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0045","first-page":"197","article-title":"Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches","volume":"64","author":"Landeen","year":"2011","journal-title":"South Dakota Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006","article-title":"Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer","volume":"165","author":"Coronado","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.23275","article-title":"Utilization of and charges for robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer","volume":"107","author":"Yu","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e328348a26e","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies","volume":"23","author":"Sarlos","year":"2011","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0b013e328340451a","article-title":"Role of robotic surgery in urogynecologic surgery and radical hysterectomy: how far can we go?","volume":"21","author":"Swan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181ee6e4d","article-title":"Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer","volume":"116","author":"Barnett","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.03.012","article-title":"Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy","volume":"17","author":"Holtz","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.06.009","article-title":"Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes","volume":"17","author":"Pasic","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012","article-title":"Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case\u2013control study","volume":"150","author":"Sarlos","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.08.022","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques","volume":"111","author":"Bell","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2012.06.031","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer","volume":"127","author":"Wright","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.11.036","article-title":"An economic analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: costs, charges and reimbursements to hospitals and professionals","volume":"125","author":"Venkat","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2011.36.7508","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer","volume":"30","author":"Wright","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13462882736736","article-title":"Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies","volume":"16","author":"Wright","year":"2012","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.186","article-title":"Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease","volume":"309","author":"Wright","year":"2013","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0120","first-page":"137","article-title":"New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature","volume":"62","author":"Cho","year":"2010","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1422","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f74153","article-title":"Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review","volume":"116","author":"Gaia","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"852061","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/852061","article-title":"Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review","volume":"2011","author":"Weinberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-1981-z","article-title":"Robotic surgery in the management of cervical carcinoma","volume":"284","author":"Alazzam","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2681-z","article-title":"Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"287","author":"O\u2019Neill","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1772","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7269","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery","volume":"97","author":"Reza","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.08.008","article-title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy vs traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy: five metaanalyses","volume":"18","author":"Scandola","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0155","first-page":"CD008978","article-title":"Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease","volume":"2","author":"Liu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0160","first-page":"CD008640","article-title":"Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer","volume":"1","author":"Lu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0165","series-title":"Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses","author":"Ho","year":"2011"},{"issue":"27","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0170","first-page":"1","article-title":"Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis","volume":"10","author":"Medical Advisory Secretariat","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ont Health Technol Assess Ser"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0175","series-title":"Robot-assisted surgery: health technology assessment","author":"Camberlin","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0180","series-title":"Robotic-assisted surgery for urological, cardiac and gynaecological procedures. ASERNIP-S Report No. 75","author":"Thavaneswaran","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0185","series-title":"Robotic gynaecological surgery","author":"Pichon Riviere","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0190","series-title":"Health technology assessment of robot-assisted surgery in selected surgical procedures","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c33c4f","article-title":"ACOG Technology Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 6: robot-assisted surgery","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.11.006","article-title":"Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Robotics Task force","volume":"124","author":"Ramirez","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0b013e31824c5cd2","article-title":"Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics","volume":"22","author":"Mok","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0b013e3182353371","article-title":"Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy","volume":"22","author":"Bernardini","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.09.038","article-title":"Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer","volume":"124","author":"Elsahwi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.081","article-title":"Evolution of surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer","volume":"205","author":"Boruta","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1583","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-011-2136-y","article-title":"Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer","volume":"19","author":"Escobar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.08.001","article-title":"Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology","volume":"123","author":"Soliman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.05.024","article-title":"A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma","volume":"122","author":"Subramaniam","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.4236\/jct.2012.32022","article-title":"Robotic assisted, total laparoscopic, and total abdominal hysterectomy for management of uterine cancer","volume":"3","author":"Nevadunsky","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Cancer Ther"},{"issue":"368","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0245","first-page":"e1","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"208","author":"Paraiso","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318265b61a","article-title":"Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy. A randomized controlled trial","volume":"120","author":"Sarlos","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.1463","article-title":"Robot-assisted hysterectomy vs total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes","volume":"8","author":"Gocemen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13462882736899","article-title":"Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches","volume":"16","author":"Orady","year":"2012","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0265","unstructured":"NOMESCO classification of surgical procedures 2011 [Internet]. NOMESCO 2011 [updated 10 July 2011]. http:\/\/nomesco-eng.nom-nos.dk\/default.asp?side=237."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.11.045","article-title":"Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy","volume":"121","author":"Magrina","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-013-0780-x","article-title":"Gynaecological robotic surgery in an Irish setting\u2014cost analysis","volume":"10","author":"O'Sullivan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.12.007","article-title":"AAGL Position Statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology","volume":"20","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"973830","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/973830","article-title":"Are costs of robot-assisted surgery warranted for gynecological procedures?","volume":"2011","author":"van Dam","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"issue":"499","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0290","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Evaluation of the introduction of robotic technology on route of hysterectomy and complications in the first year of use","volume":"203","author":"Matthews","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1741","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der116","article-title":"FINHYST, a prospective study of 5279 hysterectomies: complications and their risk factors","volume":"26","author":"Brummer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.080005383.x","article-title":"Safety aspects of laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"80","author":"Harkki","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.7.1473","article-title":"Morbidity of 10110 hysterectomies by type of approach","volume":"16","author":"Makinen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0310","first-page":"3997","article-title":"Robottiavusteinen prostatektomia eturauhassy\u00f6v\u00e4n hoidossa: J\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4llinen kirjallisuuskatsaus","volume":"63","author":"Taari","year":"2008","journal-title":"Finn Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0315","first-page":"3213","article-title":"Robottiavusteisen kohdunpoiston edut, haitat ja kustannukset","volume":"67","author":"Tapper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Finn Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1006602","article-title":"New technology and health care costs \u2013 the case of robot-assisted surgery","volume":"363","author":"Barbash","year":"2010","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211514001420?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211514001420?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:30:37Z","timestamp":1759555837000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211514001420"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,6]]},"references-count":64,"alternative-id":["S0301211514001420"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}