{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T21:30:52Z","timestamp":1778189452177,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,1]],"date-time":"2014-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1404172800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,1]],"date-time":"2014-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1404172800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,19]],"date-time":"2014-04-19T17:00:16Z","timestamp":1397926816000},"page":"192-198","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"178","author":[{"given":"Maria Luisa","family":"L\u00f3pez-Regalado","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ana","family":"Clavero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maria Carmen","family":"Gonzalvo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maria","family":"Serrano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luis","family":"Mart\u00ednez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Juan","family":"Mozas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fernando","family":"Rodr\u00edguez-Serrano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Juan","family":"Fontes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jose A.","family":"Castilla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2318","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det278","article-title":"The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) and consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)","volume":"28","author":"Ferraretti","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh744","article-title":"Single embryo transfer: a mini-review","volume":"20","author":"Bergh","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0015","first-page":"105","article-title":"Single embryo transfer and IVF\/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal","volume":"11","author":"Gerris","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1157\/13093207","article-title":"Costes de las t\u00e9cnicas de reproducci\u00f3n asistida en un hospital p\u00fablico","volume":"20","author":"Navarro","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gac Sanit"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0025","first-page":"603","article-title":"ESRHE reproduction and society task force. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective","volume":"16","author":"Conolly","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.5694\/mja10.11448","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia","volume":"195","author":"Chambers","year":"2011","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3609","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des315","article-title":"Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study","volume":"27","author":"Sullivan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0040","first-page":"21","article-title":"Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials","author":"Mc Lernon","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0045","first-page":"7","article-title":"Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection","author":"Pandian","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.05.020","article-title":"Impact of the Spanish Fertility Society guidelines on the number of embryos to transfer","volume":"21","author":"Cabello","year":"2010","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2009.09.028","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinics","volume":"19","author":"Castilla","year":"2009","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0060","first-page":"107","article-title":"Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer","volume":"17","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2718","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den327","article-title":"Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey","volume":"23","author":"van Peperstraten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340902956939","article-title":"Cumulative delivery rate in an in vitro fertilization program with a single embryo transfer policy","volume":"88","author":"Sundstrom","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obst et Gyne"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2036","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den156","article-title":"Why don\u2019t we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals","volume":"23","author":"van Peperstraten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei359","article-title":"In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"21","author":"van Montfoort","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization","volume":"351","author":"Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh672","article-title":"Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"20","author":"Lukassen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep042","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF\/ICSI","volume":"24","author":"Veleva","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0100","unstructured":"Ardoy M, Calder\u00f3n G, Cuadros J, et al. II Criterios ASEBIR de valoraci\u00f3n morfol\u00f3gica de oocitos, embriones tempranos y blastocistos humanos, 2nd ed. Madrid; 2008."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-7-210","article-title":"Resource allocation of in-vitro fertilization: a nationwide register-based cohort study","volume":"7","author":"Klemetti","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.11.050","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer","volume":"97","author":"American Society for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den355","article-title":"Modelling the impact of single embryo transfer in a national health service IVF programme","volume":"24","author":"Roberts","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2673","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem173","article-title":"Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer \u2013 a questionnaire study","volume":"22","author":"H\u00f8jgaard","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0125","first-page":"1","article-title":"The impact of legally restricted embryo transfer and reimbursement polic on cumulative delivery rate after treatment with assited reproduction technology","volume":"0","author":"Peeraer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer in oocyte donation programmes: should it be the rule?","volume":"25","author":"Clua","year":"2012","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1900","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.9.1900","article-title":"One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study","volume":"16","author":"Martikainen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des371","article-title":"Evaluation of an effective multifaceted implementation strategy for elective single-embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization","volume":"28","author":"Kreuwel","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044","article-title":"Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles","volume":"99","author":"Shapiro","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.02.003","article-title":"Sibling embryo blastocyst development as a prognostic factor for the outcome of day-3 embryo transfer","volume":"26","author":"Mackenna","year":"2013","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211514002188?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211514002188?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:32:06Z","timestamp":1759555926000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211514002188"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,7]]},"references-count":30,"alternative-id":["S0301211514002188"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}