{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]],"date-time":"2026-07-25T11:36:40Z","timestamp":1784979400452,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,1]],"date-time":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1420070400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,1]],"date-time":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1420070400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,20]],"date-time":"2014-11-20T18:02:47Z","timestamp":1416506567000},"page":"89-96","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"special_numbering":"C","title":["The estimated volume of the fibroid uterus: a comparison of ultrasound and bimanual examination versus volume at MRI or hysterectomy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"184","author":[{"given":"Barbara","family":"Stoelinga","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Judith","family":"Huirne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martijn W.","family":"Heymans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jim A.","family":"Reekers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Willem M.","family":"Ankum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wouter J.K.","family":"Hehenkamp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"Aug (2 Pt 1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf","article-title":"Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States","volume":"122","author":"Wright","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Feb (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01309.x","article-title":"Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in The Netherlands","volume":"91","author":"Hanstede","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"Mar (12)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0015","first-page":"856","article-title":"Indications for hysterectomy","volume":"328","author":"Carlson","year":"1993","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"Dec (7)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90362-3","article-title":"Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The collaborative review of sterilization","volume":"144","author":"Dicker","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Jun (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2005.01.010","article-title":"Health economics of hysterectomy","volume":"19","author":"Garry","year":"2005","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"Mar (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01282.x","article-title":"The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery","volume":"109","author":"Maresh","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0035","first-page":"CD003677","article-title":"Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease","author":"Nieboer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"Dec (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1561","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127596","article-title":"Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"187","author":"Benassi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Dec (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0045","first-page":"1271","article-title":"Hysterectomy for the massive leiomyomatous uterus","volume":"100","author":"Unger","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Jul (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.009","article-title":"Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect","volume":"20","author":"Uccella","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"Mar (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.08.009","article-title":"Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"14","author":"Kluivers","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"Jun (6 Pt 1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0060","first-page":"787","article-title":"Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications","volume":"95","author":"Kovac","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Jan (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d3b00","article-title":"Quality of life after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"119","author":"Nieboer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Jun (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1321","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000124570.95087.84","article-title":"Transvaginal hysterectomy: rationale and surgical approach","volume":"103","author":"Kovac","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Jul (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00131-8","article-title":"Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma","volume":"92","author":"Cantuaria","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Oct (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(98)00118-3","article-title":"Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of nongravid, enlarged uteri\u2014correlation with bimanual examination","volume":"80","author":"Dekel","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"Dec (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0085","first-page":"855","article-title":"Size and weight determinations of nongravid enlarged uteri","volume":"68","author":"Flickinger","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Dec (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.07.014","article-title":"Predicting uterine weight before hysterectomy: ultrasound measurements versus clinical assessment","volume":"193","author":"Harb","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1159\/000291886","article-title":"The relationship between ultrasonic volume and actual weight of pathologic uterus","volume":"42","author":"Kung","year":"1996","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"Nov (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1618","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.017","article-title":"Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial","volume":"193","author":"Hehenkamp","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Jan (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870180105","article-title":"Ultrasound of the normal nongravid uterus: correlation with gross and histopathology","volume":"18","author":"Platt","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"issue":"Feb (8476)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","article-title":"Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement","volume":"81","author":"Bland","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"Mar (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","article-title":"The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data","volume":"33","author":"Landis","year":"1977","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"issue":"Mar (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"860","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2013.12.004","article-title":"Comparison of measurements of the uterus and cervix obtained by magnetic resonance and transabdominal ultrasound imaging to identify the brachytherapy target in patients with cervix cancer","volume":"88","author":"Van Dijk","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys"},{"issue":"Apr (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2009.03.005","article-title":"MRI appearance of mesenchymal tumors of the uterus","volume":"74","author":"Cornfeld","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"Oct (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sult.2010.08.001","article-title":"Radiology of benign disorders of menstruation","volume":"31","author":"Griffin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Semin Ultrasound CT MR"},{"issue":"Apr (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2012.02065.x","article-title":"Preoperative assessment by magnetic resonance imaging is useful for planning the treatment of an enlarged uterus by total laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"39","author":"Hatta","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"Apr (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.02.013","article-title":"Ultrasonographic assessment of weight of the myomatous uterus: a pilot study using a new combined geometrical formula","volume":"137","author":"Rovio","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"Dec (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011_bib0145","first-page":"579","article-title":"Measuring the volume of uterine fibroids using 2- and 3-dimensional ultrasound and comparison with histopathology","volume":"51","author":"Zivkovic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Clin Croat"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211514005946?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211514005946?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:33:07Z","timestamp":1759555987000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211514005946"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]},"references-count":29,"alternative-id":["S0301211514005946"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The estimated volume of the fibroid uterus: a comparison of ultrasound and bimanual examination versus volume at MRI or hysterectomy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.011","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}