{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T12:39:28Z","timestamp":1778071168178,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,30]],"date-time":"2015-05-30T04:49:56Z","timestamp":1432961396000},"page":"23-27","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Prediction of cesarean section risk in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"191","author":[{"given":"Karin","family":"van der Tuuk","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maria G.","family":"van Pampus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Corine M.","family":"Koopmans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jan G.","family":"Aarnoudse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul P.","family":"van den Berg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Johannes J.","family":"van Beek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Frans J.A.","family":"Copraij","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gunilla","family":"Kleiverda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Martina","family":"Porath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Robbert J.P.","family":"Rijnders","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paulien C.M.","family":"van der Salm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Leonard P.","family":"Morssink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rob H.","family":"Stigter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ben W.J.","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Henk","family":"Groen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0075","first-page":"164","article-title":"Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies","volume":"100","author":"Rayburn","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1159\/000073771","article-title":"Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset. A matched cohort study","volume":"56","author":"van Gemund","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.119643","article-title":"Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched control study","volume":"186","author":"Cammu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0090","first-page":"917","article-title":"Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term","volume":"95","author":"Maslow","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"March (3 Pt 1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","article-title":"Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions","volume":"180","author":"Yeast","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00043-4","article-title":"Preeclampsia: is induction of labor more successful?","volume":"89","author":"Xenakis","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"December (12)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1366","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01111.x","article-title":"Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review","volume":"113","author":"Crane","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"May (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500127690","article-title":"Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length","volume":"17","author":"Rane","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks\u2019 gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"August (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2011.01311.x","article-title":"Prediction of progression to a high risk situation in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term","volume":"51","author":"van der Tuuk","year":"2011","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(99)00103-1","article-title":"Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis","volume":"52","author":"Steyerberg","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"March","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b604","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b604","article-title":"Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model","volume":"338","author":"Royston","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7315","article-title":"Validation of models that predict cesarean section after induction of labor","volume":"34","author":"Verhoeven","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211515001621?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211515001621?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:34:26Z","timestamp":1759556066000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211515001621"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"references-count":14,"alternative-id":["S0301211515001621"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Prediction of cesarean section risk in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}