{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T21:07:48Z","timestamp":1792098468787,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,1]],"date-time":"2016-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464739200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,1]],"date-time":"2016-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464739200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004331","name":"Snedkermester Sophus Jacobsen and wife Astrid Jacobsen's Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004331","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Family Hede Nielsens Foundation"},{"name":"The Philanthropic Foundation (Trygfonden)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,3]],"date-time":"2016-04-03T00:19:31Z","timestamp":1459642771000},"page":"65-69","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"201","author":[{"given":"J.","family":"Glavind","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.D.","family":"Madsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Uldbjerg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Dueholm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6395","article-title":"High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination","volume":"34","author":"Osser","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"February","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0135","article-title":"Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement","author":"Baranov","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"January (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8864","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting","volume":"37","author":"Bij de Vaate","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13199","article-title":"Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following cesarean section: systematic review","volume":"43","author":"Bij de Vaate","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"July (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2011.577252","article-title":"Sonographically detected caesarean section scar defects and menstrual irregularity","volume":"31","author":"Uppal","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"January (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12542","article-title":"Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"121","author":"van der Voet","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6405","article-title":"Cesarean scar defect: correlation between cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position","volume":"34","author":"Wang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.04.024","article-title":"Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section","volume":"89","author":"Donnez","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"March\u2013April (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.10.004","article-title":"Resectoscopic correction of the \u201cisthmocele\u201d in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility","volume":"15","author":"Gubbini","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"May\u2013June (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.12.006","article-title":"Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women","volume":"20","author":"Marotta","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"January\u2013March (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13517013317996","article-title":"Robotic repair of uterine dehiscence","volume":"17","author":"La Rosa","year":"2013","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"January (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12537","article-title":"Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review","volume":"121","author":"van der Voet","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318209abf0","article-title":"Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women","volume":"117","author":"Vikhareva Osser","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"April (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.003","article-title":"Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery","volume":"27","author":"Valentin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"October","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-014-0365-3","article-title":"Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study","volume":"14","author":"Pomorski","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10077","article-title":"Standardized approach for imaging and measuring cesarean section scars using ultrasonography","volume":"39","author":"Naji","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"August (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12376","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study","volume":"42","author":"Glavind","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"February (8476)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","article-title":"Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement","volume":"1","author":"Bland","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.122","article-title":"Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies","volume":"22","author":"Bland","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34475-9","article-title":"Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review","volume":"32","author":"Jastrow","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"March (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","article-title":"The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data","volume":"33","author":"Landis","year":"1977","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"issue":"September (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rcl.2014.05.010","article-title":"Imaging evaluation of maternal complications associated with repeat cesarean deliveries","volume":"52","author":"Moshiri","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiol Clin N Am"},{"issue":"May","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018","article-title":"Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a caesarean scar and assessment of its shape","volume":"188","author":"Marjolein Bij de Vaate","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.014","article-title":"Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment","volume":"201","author":"Bujold","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"August (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12479","article-title":"Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis","volume":"42","author":"Kok","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516301099?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516301099?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:36:03Z","timestamp":1759556163000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211516301099"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"references-count":25,"alternative-id":["S0301211516301099"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}