{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T02:47:20Z","timestamp":1784774840918,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,1]],"date-time":"2016-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477958400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,1]],"date-time":"2016-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477958400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]],"date-time":"2016-08-04T02:01:39Z","timestamp":1470276099000},"page":"53-56","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"206","author":[{"given":"Tabitha L.","family":"Schrufer-Poland","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria P.","family":"Ruiz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Samuel","family":"Kassar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher","family":"Tomassian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stacey D.","family":"Algren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John D.","family":"Yeast","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0005","first-page":"285","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs. staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery","volume":"203","author":"Basha","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"October (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-2077.123395","article-title":"Cutaneous wound closure materials: an overview and update","volume":"6","author":"Al-Mubarak","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Cutaneous Aesthetic Surg"},{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822227e5","article-title":"Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Nuthalapaty","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181a805c5","article-title":"The absorbable dermal staple device: a faster, more cost-effective method for incisional closure","volume":"124","author":"Cross","year":"2009","journal-title":"Plastic Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"December (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0025","first-page":"556","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery","volume":"209","author":"Feese","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1615\/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v22.i2.50","article-title":"The influence of absorbable subcuticular staples, continuous subcuticular absorbable suture, and percutaneous metal skin staples on infection in contaminated wounds","volume":"22","author":"Pineros-Fernandez","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Long-term Effects Med Implants"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e75132","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0075132","article-title":"A systematic review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis: staples versus sutures for surgical procedures","volume":"8","author":"Hemming","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"May (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0040","first-page":"621","article-title":"Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis","volume":"212","author":"Mackeen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ad61e","article-title":"Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"117","author":"Tuuli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"January","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0050","first-page":"1","article-title":"Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis","author":"Wang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"May (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.018","article-title":"Staples vs. subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"204","author":"Clay","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"October (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a5f0c3","article-title":"Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"122","author":"Aabakke","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"November (11)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1975","DOI":"10.2460\/ajvr.2005.66.1975","article-title":"Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs","volume":"66","author":"Fick","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Vet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1615\/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v16.i1.30","article-title":"A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods","volume":"16","author":"Pineros-Fernandez","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Long-term Effects Med Implants"},{"issue":"June (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34213-X","article-title":"Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques","volume":"31","author":"Altman","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Canada"},{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0080","first-page":"36","article-title":"Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial","volume":"203","author":"Cromi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"October (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3274-9","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with \u2018staples\u2019 or \u2018subcuticular sutures\u2019 in emergency cesarean section","volume":"290","author":"Sharma","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"January (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.998647","article-title":"Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status","volume":"29","author":"Fitzwater","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"May (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-3098-z","article-title":"Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing","volume":"289","author":"Ibrahim","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308284?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308284?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:37:26Z","timestamp":1759556246000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211516308284"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"references-count":19,"alternative-id":["S0301211516308284"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}