{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T02:51:26Z","timestamp":1790218286891,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]],"date-time":"2016-08-04T14:16:05Z","timestamp":1470320165000},"page":"60-65","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":104,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"205","author":[{"given":"Elisabetta","family":"Costantini","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8598-2589","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Linda","family":"Brubaker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mauro","family":"Cervigni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine A.","family":"Matthews","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4031-9414","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Barry A.","family":"O\u2019Reilly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diaa","family":"Rizk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7552-0831","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Konstantinos","family":"Giannitsas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher F.","family":"Maher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-196207000-00009","article-title":"Repair of post hysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse","volume":"20","author":"Lane","year":"1962","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0010","first-page":"CD004014","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women","volume":"30","author":"Maher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0015","series-title":"Medical devices. FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence","author":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0020","author":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2231-7","article-title":"Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh","volume":"25","author":"Skoczylas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20845","article-title":"International Consultation on Urological Diseases: evidence-based medicine overview of the main steps for developing and grading guideline recommendations","volume":"29","author":"Abrams","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1008","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x","article-title":"Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique","volume":"32","author":"Hasson","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1418","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70084-4","article-title":"Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation","volume":"175","author":"Benson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.1998.14.59","article-title":"Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison","volume":"14","author":"Lo","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Gynecol Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.031","article-title":"Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"190","author":"Maher","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial","volume":"204","author":"Maher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2666-0","article-title":"High uterosacral vault suspension vs sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up","volume":"26","author":"Rondini","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"15","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1557","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa054208","article-title":"Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence","volume":"354","author":"Brubaker","year":"2006","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2006.08.034","article-title":"Must colposuspension be associated with sacropexy to prevent postoperative urinary incontinence?","volume":"51","author":"Costantini","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.05.023","article-title":"Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial","volume":"180","author":"Costantini","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1885-x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study","volume":"24","author":"Freeman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000006","article-title":"Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Anger","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1249-3","article-title":"Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up","volume":"22","author":"Tate","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827558dc","article-title":"Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Culligan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c","article-title":"Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Paraiso","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00001.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function","volume":"111","author":"Roovers","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","article-title":"Uterine-preserving prolapse surgery","volume":"24","author":"Gutman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1265-3","article-title":"Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy","volume":"22","author":"Tan-Kim","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2094","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.07.066","article-title":"Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh","volume":"193","author":"Bensinger","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0125","series-title":"Quantitative assessment of the prevalence of unsuspected uterine sarcoma in women undergoing treatment of uterine fibroids: summary and key findings","author":"Food and Drug Administration","year":"2014"},{"issue":"19","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","article-title":"Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"309","author":"Nygaard","year":"2013","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2362","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2009.07.043","article-title":"Medium term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with xenografts compared to synthetic grafts","volume":"182","author":"Deprest","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.02.014","article-title":"Satisfaction, quality of life and lumbar pain following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: suture vs. tackers","volume":"187","author":"Vieillefosse","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827c61de","article-title":"Preventing L5-S1 discitis associated with sacrocolpopexy","volume":"121","author":"Good","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00426.x","article-title":"Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series","volume":"112","author":"Elneil","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308302?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308302?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:36:09Z","timestamp":1759556169000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211516308302"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"references-count":30,"alternative-id":["S0301211516308302"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}