{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,25]],"date-time":"2026-10-25T00:03:31Z","timestamp":1792886611845,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472688000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472688000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]],"date-time":"2016-08-04T14:21:26Z","timestamp":1470320486000},"page":"44-50","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":57,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"204","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2220-371X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sven","family":"Kehl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christel","family":"Weiss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Werner","family":"Rath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0005","first-page":"CD009792","article-title":"Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1394","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00287.x","article-title":"Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section","volume":"111","author":"Locatelli","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12449","article-title":"Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience","volume":"121","author":"Scott","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"25","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","article-title":"Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study","volume":"193","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section","volume":"117","author":"Al-Zirqi","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.017","article-title":"Predictors of induction success","volume":"36","author":"Grobman","year":"2012","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12605","article-title":"Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate","volume":"121","author":"Schoorel","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12539","article-title":"Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term","volume":"121","author":"Schoorel","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1271214","article-title":"Does information available at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent patient cohort","volume":"28","author":"Costantine","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e31817f1505","article-title":"Predicting success and reducing the risks when attempting vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"63","author":"Harper","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e318273feeb","article-title":"Uterine rupture during trial of labor: controversy of induction\u2019s methods","volume":"67","author":"Ophir","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00011","article-title":"Cervical ripening and labor induction after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"43","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2000","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3444-9","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"291","author":"Rossi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0080","first-page":"CD001233","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","article-title":"Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Vaknin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02905.x","article-title":"Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Fox","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.013","article-title":"Off-label use of misoprostol for labor induction: a nation-wide survey in Switzerland","volume":"159","author":"Krause","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.026","article-title":"Off-label use of misoprostol for labor induction in Germany: a national survey","volume":"187","author":"Voigt","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745159","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/745159","article-title":"Cervical ripening in the Netherlands: a survey","volume":"2013","author":"Huisman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2013.11.002","article-title":"Survey on cervical ripening practices in France","volume":"42","author":"Bel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.1.42.45","article-title":"Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter","volume":"12","author":"Ben-Aroya","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","article-title":"Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-828608","article-title":"Uterine rupture in patients with a prior cesarean delivery: the impact of cervical ripening","volume":"21","author":"Hoffman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12320","article-title":"Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"93","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"183","author":"Ravasia","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3287-4","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol","volume":"290","author":"Sananes","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0145","first-page":"140","article-title":"The transcervical foley catheter versus the vaginal prostaglandin e2 gel in the induction of labour in a previous one caesarean section\u2014a clinical study","volume":"7","author":"Ziyauddin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0150","first-page":"243","article-title":"Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review","volume":"21","author":"Cheuk","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.801114.x","article-title":"Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section using the double balloon device","volume":"80","author":"Khotaba","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00421.x","article-title":"Use of the Atad catheter for the induction of labour in women who have had a previous Caesarean section\u2014a case series","volume":"45","author":"Miller","year":"2005","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.4236\/ojog.2013.32056","article-title":"Induction of labor using double balloon cervical device in women with previous cesarean section: experience and review","volume":"3","author":"Ebeid","year":"2013","journal-title":"Open J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.4236\/ojog.2013.31A039","article-title":"Double balloon device compared to oxytocin for induction of labour after previous caesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Ferradas","year":"2013","journal-title":"Open J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.03.010","article-title":"Cervical ripening with balloon catheter for scared uterus: a three-year retrospective study","volume":"42","author":"Rossard","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2014.07.014","article-title":"Cervical ripening after previous cesarean section with Foley catheter: a prospective study of 41 patients","volume":"44","author":"Lamourdedieu","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.06.006","article-title":"Balloon catheter for cervical ripening on scarred uterus with unfavorable cervix: multicenter retrospective study of 151 patients","volume":"43","author":"Sarreau","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1590\/SO100-720320150005120","article-title":"Mechanical method of induction of labor in high-risk pregnant women with previous cesarean section","volume":"37","author":"Souza","year":"2015","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0195","unstructured":"Wing D. Cervical ripening and induction of labor in women with a prior cesarean delivery, http:\/\/wwwuptodatecom\/contents\/cervical-ripening-and-induction-of-labor-in-women-with-a-prior-cesarean-delivery?source=see_link&sectionName=RISK+OF+RUPTURE&anchor=H3#H3; 2015 [Version 25.0]."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.026","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"212","author":"Palatnik","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.715","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of different methods for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section","volume":"210","author":"Huisman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115278","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: to induce or not to induce","volume":"184","author":"Sims","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3 Pt. 2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","article-title":"The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"193","author":"Landon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.003","article-title":"Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age","volume":"195","author":"Caughey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820caf12","article-title":"Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"117","author":"Osmundson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2838","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.130925","article-title":"Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"186","author":"Mishanina","year":"2014","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13116","article-title":"Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"122","author":"Kehl","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.029","article-title":"Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study","volume":"204","author":"Cromi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0250","first-page":"CD003246","article-title":"Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"4","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2094-4","article-title":"Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone","volume":"285","author":"Ande","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3907-7","article-title":"Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section","volume":"293","author":"Kehl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005","article-title":"Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review","volume":"199","author":"Heinemann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9809","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2095","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.010","article-title":"Combination of misoprostol and mechanical dilation for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"159","author":"Kehl","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0280","first-page":"686","article-title":"Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes","volume":"114","author":"Mackeen","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Am Osteopath Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318220e4b7","article-title":"Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Salim","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.10.325","article-title":"A prospective randomized study comparing induction of labor with the foley catheter and the cervical ripening double balloon catheter in nuliparous and multiparous women","volume":"201","author":"Solt","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.591459","article-title":"Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial","volume":"25","author":"Mei-Dan","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","article-title":"Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel","volume":"116","author":"Pennell","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1765","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.879704","article-title":"Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters","volume":"27","author":"Mei-Dan","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30509-0","article-title":"Does cervical ripening at term using a high volume foley catheter result in a lower caesarean section rate than a low volume foley catheter? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"36","author":"Berndl","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505_bib0315","unstructured":"Induction of labour in women after previous caesarean delivery. The PROBAAT-S study, http:\/\/wwwstudies-obsgynnlprobaets; 2011."}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308326?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308326?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:36:16Z","timestamp":1759556176000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211516308326"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"references-count":63,"alternative-id":["S0301211516308326"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}