{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T10:18:27Z","timestamp":1783073907647,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472688000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472688000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,5]],"date-time":"2016-08-05T08:04:06Z","timestamp":1470384246000},"page":"78-82","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"204","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2220-371X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sven","family":"Kehl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christel","family":"Weiss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ulf","family":"Dammer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jutta","family":"Heimrich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthias W.","family":"Beckmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Florian","family":"Faschingbauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marc","family":"S\u00fctterlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0005","first-page":"164","article-title":"Rising rates of labour induction: present concerns and future strategies","volume":"100","author":"Rayburn","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745159","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/745159","article-title":"Cervical ripening in the Netherlands: a survey","volume":"2013","author":"Huisman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0015","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02905.x","article-title":"Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Fox","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","article-title":"Foley catheter balloon vs. locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Vaknin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.12.018","article-title":"Women\u2019s acceptance of a double-balloon device as an additional method for inducing labour","volume":"168","author":"Kehl","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","article-title":"Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel","volume":"116","author":"Pennell","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.010","article-title":"Combination of misoprostol and mechanical dilation for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"159","author":"Kehl","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2094-4","article-title":"Induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone","volume":"285","author":"Ande","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0028-1091396","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction","volume":"26","author":"Hill","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.05.020","article-title":"A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter","volume":"207","author":"Cromi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13116","article-title":"Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"122","author":"Kehl","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0065","unstructured":"Kehl S, B\u00f6hm L, Weiss C, et al. Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labour. submitted."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0070","first-page":"CD001338","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour","volume":"6","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507_bib0075","first-page":"CD007707","article-title":"Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes","volume":"2","author":"Bakker","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308399?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308399?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:36:47Z","timestamp":1759556207000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211516308399"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"references-count":15,"alternative-id":["S0301211516308399"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}