{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T12:09:11Z","timestamp":1785499751625,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,11]],"date-time":"2016-08-11T14:40:34Z","timestamp":1470926434000},"page":"91-97","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"205","author":[{"given":"Petar N.","family":"Ignatov","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer E.","family":"Lutomski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.027","article-title":"Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability","volume":"199","author":"Chauhan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2005.03575.x","article-title":"Midwives\u2019 visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement","volume":"52","author":"Devane","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2005.044","article-title":"Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome","volume":"33","author":"Figueras","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0020","first-page":"1","article-title":"Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts","volume":"110","author":"Blix","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1307","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08187.x","article-title":"Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision","volume":"106","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0030","article-title":"Expert systems for fetal assessment in labour","author":"Lutomski","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0035","article-title":"Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour","author":"East","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0040","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace","author":"East","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000116.pub3","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour","volume":"4","author":"Neilson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0050","article-title":"A multicentre randomised controlled trial of an intelligent system to support decision making in the management of labour using the cardiotocogram (INFANT)","author":"Brocklehurst","year":"2013","journal-title":"Curr Control Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-10-71","article-title":"A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring","volume":"10","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1557","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01857.x","article-title":"Sensitivity and specificity of intrapartum computerised FIGO criteria for cardiotocography and fetal scalp pH during labour: multicentre, observational study","volume":"115","author":"Schiermeier","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02645.x","article-title":"Access to computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocographs improves clinicians\u2019 prediction of newborn umbilical artery blood pH","volume":"117","author":"Costa","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-199604000-00008","article-title":"Intelligent fetal heart rate computer systems in intrapartum surveillance","volume":"8","author":"Greene","year":"1996","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0075","first-page":"3","article-title":"Indirect standard cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus indirect quantitative cardiotocography\u2014a randomized comparative study in intrapartum monitoring","volume":"51","author":"Ignatov","year":"2012","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-835867","article-title":"CTG: microfluctuation","volume":"208","author":"Roemer","year":"2004","journal-title":"Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2006-941552","article-title":"Quantitative Cardiotocography\u2014what does it look like and what can we expect","volume":"210","author":"Roemer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0090","first-page":"3","article-title":"A comparative study of the prognostic pH values of the fetus in utero, generated by the quantitative cardiotocography computer method, and the actual pH values measured immediately after delivery","volume":"49","author":"Ignatov","year":"2010","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0095","first-page":"13","article-title":"Structure and function of the cardiotocographic score (CTG-score) calculated by the quantitative cardiotocography computer method. Determining the significance of its components for the accuracy of the estimates for the ph of the fetus","volume":"50","author":"Ignatov","year":"2011","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0100","first-page":"3","article-title":"Quantitative cardiotocography\u2014clinical practice guideline","volume":"50","author":"Ignatov","year":"2011","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.V36N6p416","article-title":"Use of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum monitoring","volume":"36","author":"Su","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singap"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(95)90308-9","article-title":"Intrapartum surveillance: recommendations on current practice and overview of new developments. FIGO Study Group on the Assessment of New Technology","volume":"49","author":"International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics","year":"1995","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05097.x","article-title":"The value of antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high-risk pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"89","author":"Brown","year":"1982","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/PL00003051","article-title":"Derzeitiger Stand der intrapartalen U berwachung des Kindes","volume":"30","author":"Goeschen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Gynakologe"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0125","first-page":"3","article-title":"Evaluation des CTG","volume":"29","author":"Schneider","year":"1996","journal-title":"Krit Eval CTG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1007\/s001520050088","article-title":"Ist die Pulsoxymetrie ein Gewinn f\u00fcr die \u00fcberwachung des Feten sub partu?","volume":"10","author":"Seelbach-G\u00f6bel","year":"1998","journal-title":"Perinatalmedizin"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0135","first-page":"715","article-title":"Interrelationships among abnormal cardiotocograms in labor, meconium staining of the amniotic fluid, arterial cord blood pH, and Apgar scores","volume":"74","author":"Steer","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02515.x","article-title":"Birth asphyxia and the intrapartum cardiotocograph","volume":"97","author":"Murphy","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1007\/s001290050154","article-title":"Das intrapartale CTG","volume":"30","author":"Axt","year":"1997","journal-title":"Gynakologe"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.288.3.358","article-title":"The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials","volume":"288","author":"Halpern","year":"2002","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0155","first-page":"8","article-title":"Types of hospital property and the relative rate of cesarean section occurrence","volume":"54","author":"Konstantinov","year":"2015","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023_bib0160","first-page":"13","article-title":"Study of women preference regarding mode of delivery","volume":"43","author":"Dimitrov","year":"2004","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308715?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211516308715?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:36:41Z","timestamp":1759556201000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211516308715"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["S0301211516308715"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}