{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T19:18:00Z","timestamp":1778786280192,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,1]],"date-time":"2017-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1493596800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,1]],"date-time":"2017-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1493596800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,22]],"date-time":"2017-03-22T03:32:48Z","timestamp":1490153568000},"page":"119-125","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: A retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"212","author":[{"given":"Stephen","family":"O\u2019Brien","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fiona","family":"Day","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Erik","family":"Lenguerrand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Katie","family":"Cornthwaite","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sian","family":"Edwards","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dimitrios","family":"Siassakos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0005","series-title":"Operative vaginal delivery","first-page":"1","author":"RCOG","year":"2011"},{"issue":"January (6155)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.1.6155.7","article-title":"Kielland\u2019s forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality","volume":"1","author":"Chiswick","year":"1979","journal-title":"BMJ Br Med J Publ Group"},{"issue":"April (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12603","article-title":"The role of rotational forceps","volume":"121","author":"Hardy","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"January (7)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610802463629","article-title":"The use of Kiellands forceps and obstetricians anxiety trait","volume":"28","author":"Meager","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"April (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12561","article-title":"Rotational forceps. Is it safe? A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour","volume":"121","author":"Ekechi","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"March (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0030","first-page":"642","article-title":"Operative vaginal birth: better training for better outcomes","volume":"121","author":"Gale","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"March (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0035","first-page":"641","article-title":"A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour","volume":"121","author":"Nash","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"March (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0040","article-title":"Rotational forceps training needs to be scaled up","volume":"121","author":"Treharne","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"January (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12511","article-title":"Kielland\u2019s forceps. From controversy to consensus?","volume":"94","author":"Nash","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"October (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182695581","article-title":"Use and safety of kielland\u02bcs forceps in current obstetric practice","volume":"120","author":"Burke","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"March (10)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12199","article-title":"A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour","volume":"120","author":"Tempest","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"May (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828b72cb","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland\u02bcs rotational forceps delivery","volume":"121","author":"Stock","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0065","article-title":"Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis","volume":"212","author":"Aiken","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"August (12)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1526","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12398","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study","volume":"120","author":"Bahl","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"October (9596)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X","article-title":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"370","author":"Elm von","year":"2007","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"May (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0080","first-page":"41","article-title":"A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery","volume":"156","author":"Murphy","year":"2011","journal-title":"EJOG"},{"issue":"July (7)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour","volume":"112","author":"Allen","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"February (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0090","first-page":"111","article-title":"Prevention of brachial plexus injury-12 years of shoulder dystocia training: an interrupted time-series study","volume":"123","author":"Crofts","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0095","article-title":"Neonatal brachial plexus injury: comparison of incidence and antecedents between 2 decades","volume":"204","author":"Walsh","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31817bbc61","article-title":"Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training","volume":"112","author":"Draycott","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"February (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00800.x","article-title":"Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome?","volume":"113","author":"Draycott","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"September (10)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1303","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01801.x","article-title":"Documentation of simulated shoulder dystocia: accurate and complete?","volume":"115","author":"Crofts","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"September","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.506","article-title":"Does vacuum delivery carry a higher risk of shoulder dystocia? Review and meta-analysis of the literature","volume":"204","author":"Dall\u2019Asta","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"December (13)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1688","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x","article-title":"A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery","volume":"115","author":"Macleod","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"May (10)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1525","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2717-6","article-title":"Kielland\u2019s forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study","volume":"26","author":"Gauthaman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"December (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000221","article-title":"Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland\u02bcs forceps","volume":"27","author":"Wattar Al","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.03.025","article-title":"Does the number of forceps deliveries performed in residency predict use in practice?","volume":"213","author":"Andrews","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"October (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0140","first-page":"341","article-title":"Qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings to establish the components of a skilled rotational forceps delivery","volume":"170","author":"Bahl","year":"2013","journal-title":"EJOG"},{"issue":"May (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"448.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.12.056","article-title":"Teaching forceps: the impact of proactive faculty","volume":"204","author":"Solt","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"October (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.04.015","article-title":"Retention of factual knowledge after practical training for intrapartum emergencies","volume":"23","author":"Crofts","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"December (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031_bib0155","first-page":"305","article-title":"Does forceps training on a birth simulator allow obstetricians to improve forceps blade placement?","volume":"159","author":"Dupuis","year":"2011","journal-title":"EJOG"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211517301422?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211517301422?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:39:02Z","timestamp":1759556342000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211517301422"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"references-count":31,"alternative-id":["S0301211517301422"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: A retrospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}