{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T18:12:06Z","timestamp":1790187126006,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,1]],"date-time":"2017-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,1]],"date-time":"2017-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,29]],"date-time":"2017-05-29T19:45:13Z","timestamp":1496087113000},"page":"75-84","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) for pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"215","author":[{"given":"Morteza","family":"Arab-Zozani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carolina O","family":"Nastri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12168","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of intra-uterine insemination versus in vitro fertilisation in patients with idiopathic or mild male infertility","volume":"54","author":"Elzeiny","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstetr Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2331","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev193","article-title":"Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?","volume":"30","author":"Tjon-Kon-Fat","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0015","series-title":"Fertility problems: assessment and treatment (CG156) ? Clinical guideline","author":"NICE","year":"2013"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0020","first-page":"1248","article-title":"An algorithm combining ultrasound monitoring and urinary luteinizing hormone testing: a novel approach for intrauterine insemination timing","volume":"33","author":"Antaki","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstetr Gynaecol Canada: JOGC=Journal d'obstetrique et Gynecologie du Canada: JOGC"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.01.028","article-title":"Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we?","volume":"82","author":"Ragni","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2249","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev201","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety as outcome measures in reproductive medicine","volume":"30","author":"Braakhekke","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0035","first-page":"CD009517","article-title":"Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques","volume":"3","author":"Nastri","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.03.047","article-title":"Ongoing pregnancy qualifies best as the primary outcome measure of choice in trials in reproductive medicine: an opinion paper","volume":"101","author":"Braakhekke","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009","article-title":"International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009","volume":"92","author":"Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0050","article-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March]","year":"2011"},{"issue":"5(May)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17327","article-title":"Blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the reproductive outcomes","volume":"49","author":"Martins","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54010-2","article-title":"Pregnancy rates after double versus single insemination with frozen donor semen","volume":"54","author":"Centola","year":"1990","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2913","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.06.082","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of single versus double intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility","volume":"94","author":"Rahman","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00980-4","article-title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of single intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus double IUI per cycle in infertile patients","volume":"80","author":"Alborzi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1684","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq112","article-title":"Single versus double intrauterine insemination in multi-follicular ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a randomized trial","volume":"25","author":"Bagis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-005-9017-x","article-title":"Comparing the pregnancy rates of one versus two intrauterine inseminations (IUIs) in male factor and idiopathic infertility","volume":"23","author":"Liu","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0085","first-page":"465","article-title":"Single versus double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a randomized trial","volume":"19","author":"Sorouri","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Iran Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.04.002","article-title":"Homologous intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a comparison among three different regimens","volume":"129","author":"Casadei","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/S1028-4559(08)60055-8","article-title":"Comparison of single versus double intrauterine insemination","volume":"47","author":"Gezginc","year":"2008","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstetr Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0100","first-page":"542","article-title":"A randomized comparison of three insemination methods in an artificial insemination program using husbands' semen","volume":"48","author":"Ng","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Reproduct Med"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0105","first-page":"39","article-title":"Superovulation and intrauterine insemination single versus dual insemination","volume":"19","author":"Peddie","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Reprod Fertil"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00326-X","article-title":"Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles","volume":"72","author":"Ragni","year":"1999","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56522-4","article-title":"Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles?","volume":"61","author":"Ransom","year":"1994","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54845-6","article-title":"A prospective, randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles","volume":"57","author":"Silverberg","year":"1992","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.08.030","article-title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of single versus double intrauterine insemination with three different timing regimens","volume":"94","author":"Tonguc","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S55","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(02)03523-9","article-title":"Double intrauterine inseminations (IUI) in clomiphene citrate (CC) cycles do not provide any advantage over single IUI: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"78","author":"Zeyneloglu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6 (Dec)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54010-2","article-title":"Pregnancy rates after double versus single insemination with frozen donor semen","volume":"54","author":"Centola","year":"1990","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015","article-title":"GRADE guidelines: 3: Rating the quality of evidence","volume":"64","author":"Balshem","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.06.052","article-title":"Double versus single intrauterine insemination for unexplained infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"94","author":"Polyzos","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1038\/aja.2013.4","article-title":"Double versus single homologous intrauterine insemination for male factor infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Zavos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Asian J Androl"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu022","article-title":"Should an intrauterine insemination with donor semen be performed 1 or 2days after the spontaneous LH rise? A prospective RCT","volume":"29","author":"Blockeel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211517302609?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211517302609?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:41:13Z","timestamp":1759556473000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211517302609"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"references-count":31,"alternative-id":["S0301211517302609"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) for pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.025","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}