{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]],"date-time":"2026-02-21T06:00:28Z","timestamp":1771653628288,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,1]],"date-time":"2017-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1504224000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,1]],"date-time":"2017-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1504224000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,28]],"date-time":"2017-06-28T23:15:28Z","timestamp":1498691728000},"page":"224-231","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A 2nd retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"216","author":[{"given":"Kim","family":"van Velthoven","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Willy","family":"Poppe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hannah","family":"Verschuere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marc","family":"Arbyn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07980.x","article-title":"A low voltage diathermy loop for taking cervical biopsies: a qualititative comparison with punch biopsy forceps","volume":"93","author":"Prendiville","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2009.02.021","article-title":"Analysis of 13 million individual patient records pertaining to Pap smears, colposcopies, biopsies and surgery on the uterine cervix (Belgium, 1996\u20132000)","volume":"48","author":"Arbyn","year":"2009","journal-title":"Prev Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a1284","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis","volume":"337","author":"Arbyn","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i3633","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i3633","article-title":"Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"354","author":"Kyrgiou","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02437.x","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: a retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital","volume":"117","author":"van de Vijver","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1232","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2","article-title":"Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"114","author":"Noehr","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"g6223","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g6223","article-title":"Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study","volume":"349","author":"Castanon","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001777","article-title":"Adverse pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","author":"Bjorge","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f7700","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f7700","article-title":"Long term outcomes for women treated for cervical precancer","volume":"348","author":"Arbyn","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02501.x","article-title":"The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ)","volume":"117","author":"Phadnis","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.06.011","article-title":"Predictive value of volume of cervical tissue removed during LLETZ on subsequent preterm delivery: a cohort study","volume":"180","author":"Kitson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1159\/000345864","article-title":"Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"75","author":"Papoutsis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0065","series-title":"Perinatale Activiteiten in Vlaanderen 2009","author":"Cammu","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0070","series-title":"Perinatale Activiteiten in Vlaanderen 2014","author":"Devlieger","year":"2015"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000251497.55065.74","article-title":"Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth","volume":"109","author":"Himes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1468","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02709.x","article-title":"Proportion of excision and cervical healing after Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) for CIN","volume":"117","author":"Founta","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0085","first-page":"546","article-title":"Cervical crypt involvement by intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"55","author":"Anderson","year":"1980","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02929.x","article-title":"Histological recurrence and depth of loop treatment of the cervix in women of reproductive age: incomplete excision versus adverse pregnancy outcome","volume":"118","author":"Ang","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1247","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03429.x","article-title":"Adverse obstetrical outcomes after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions: a Belgian multicentre study","volume":"119","author":"Simoens","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211517303202?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211517303202?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:41:54Z","timestamp":1759556514000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211517303202"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9]]},"references-count":19,"alternative-id":["S0301211517303202"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A 2nd retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}