{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,20]],"date-time":"2026-09-20T03:45:56Z","timestamp":1789875956054,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":100,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,1]],"date-time":"2017-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1509494400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,1]],"date-time":"2017-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1509494400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Michael Draper"},{"name":"NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship","award":["GNT1082548"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["GNT1082548"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,18]],"date-time":"2017-09-18T18:47:35Z","timestamp":1505760455000},"page":"73-84","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":51,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"218","author":[{"given":"Jip S.M.","family":"Gommers","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Milou","family":"Diederen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chris","family":"Wilkinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deborah","family":"Turnbull","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ben W.J.","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"No 12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0005","article-title":"Final data for 2014","volume":"Vol 64","author":"Hamilton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0010","series-title":"World HealthOrganisation","first-page":"36","article-title":"WHO recommendations for induction of labour","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 PART 1):386-97.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2095","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000361","article-title":"Induction of labor using a foley catheter or misoprostol: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"71","author":"Ten Eikelder","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2125.2000.00289.x","article-title":"Design issues for drug epidemiology","volume":"50","author":"McMahon","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-7-32","article-title":"Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach","volume":"7","author":"Loke","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0040","first-page":"2010","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0045","series-title":"Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0050","series-title":"Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual","author":"Institute","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0055","first-page":"W64","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"9","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"10028","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","article-title":"Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): A multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial","volume":"387","author":"Ten Eikelder","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1177\/0049475515626031","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing 30mL and 80mL in Foley catheter for induction of labour after previous Caesarean section","volume":"46","author":"Manish","year":"2016","journal-title":"Trop Doctor"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12320","article-title":"Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"93","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.09.015","article-title":"The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women\u2019s health","volume":"211","author":"Khan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-13-132","article-title":"Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider","volume":"13","author":"Williamson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001002","article-title":"Evaluation of a transcervical foley catheter as a source of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"126","author":"McMaster","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13456","article-title":"A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour","volume":"123","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505","article-title":"Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review","volume":"204","author":"Kehl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00544-3","article-title":"Di naro E, balestreri D, bolis P: extra-amniotic foley catheter and prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening at term gestation","volume":"97","author":"Ghezzi","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0105","first-page":"603","article-title":"A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"97","author":"Sciscione","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1500","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.07.014","article-title":"Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration","volume":"12","author":"Vandenbroucke","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0115","first-page":"347","article-title":"Ripening of cervix for induction of labor by hydrostatic sweeping of membrane versus foley\u2019s catheter ballooning alone","volume":"16","author":"Ifnan","year":"2006","journal-title":"J College Phys Surgeons\u2013Pakistan: JCPSP"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0120","first-page":"11","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared","volume":"46","author":"Greybush","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1011101","article-title":"Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone","volume":"35","author":"Lokkegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"183","author":"Ravasia","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S250","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.536","article-title":"Foley balloons & ruptured membranes: is there an increased risk of infection?","volume":"210","author":"Collins","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0715-9","article-title":"Management of Foley catheter induction among nulliparous women: a retrospective study","volume":"15","author":"Kruit","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.62","article-title":"Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure","volume":"36","author":"Kruit","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2014.229","article-title":"Labor induction utilizing the foley balloon: a randomized trial comparing standard placement versus immediate removal","volume":"35","author":"Sharma","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1159\/000009986","article-title":"Balloon catheter for induction of labor in nulliparous women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term","volume":"46","author":"Wolff","year":"1998","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0160","first-page":"145","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature","volume":"31","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1580608","article-title":"Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labor in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized multicenter trial","volume":"33","author":"Kruit","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017","article-title":"Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature","volume":"170","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12632","article-title":"Management of prolonged pregnancy by induction with a Foley catheter","volume":"94","author":"Kruit","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.06.006","article-title":"Balloon catheter for cervical ripening on scarred uterus with unfavorable cervix: multicenter retrospective study of 151 patients","volume":"43","author":"Sarreau","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0136856","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136856","article-title":"Foley catheter for induction of labor at term: an open-Label, randomized controlled trial","volume":"10","author":"Gu","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1280","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000238","article-title":"Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Edwards","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31817615a0","article-title":"Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"111","author":"Pettker","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.831066","article-title":"A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term","volume":"27","author":"Aghideh","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00842-1","article-title":"A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction","volume":"189","author":"Chung","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.140","article-title":"A randomized trial of Foley bulb induction of labor trial in nulliparas (FIAT)","volume":"214","author":"Connolly","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2292-8","article-title":"Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations","volume":"286","author":"Kandil","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.11.018","article-title":"Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction","volume":"129","author":"Chavakula","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstetrics"},{"issue":"1 I","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70149-3","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"180","author":"Sciscione","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0230","first-page":"362","article-title":"Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"84","author":"Dalui","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5 part 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0235","first-page":"751","article-title":"Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting","volume":"98","author":"Sciscione","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","article-title":"Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel","volume":"116","author":"Pennell","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001563","article-title":"Association of early amniotomy after foley balloon catheter ripening and duration of nulliparous labor induction","volume":"128","author":"Battarbee","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01843.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction","volume":"115","author":"Prager","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.331","article-title":"Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix-a comparison between Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2","volume":"214","author":"Mizrachi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0260","first-page":"168","article-title":"A randomised comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. BJOG: an international","volume":"109","author":"Levy","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"848","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.935328","article-title":"Trans-cervical double balloon catheter with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial","volume":"28","author":"Walfisch","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-25","article-title":"Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial","volume":"13","author":"Henry","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0275","first-page":"91","article-title":"Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening","volume":"80","author":"Tabowei","year":"2003","journal-title":"East Afr Med J"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01197.x","article-title":"Assessment of pain in women randomly allocated to speculum or digital insertion of the Foley catheter for induction of labor","volume":"90","author":"Jonsson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.12891\/ceog16022014","article-title":"Labor induction using modified metreurynters plus oxytocin at an institution in Japan: a retrospective study","volume":"41","author":"Matsumoto","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0550-z","article-title":"A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial","volume":"15","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0295","first-page":"224","article-title":"Cervical ripening balloon for induction of labour in high risk pregnancies","volume":"70","author":"Voon","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med J Malaysia"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0300","first-page":"243","article-title":"Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review","volume":"21","author":"Cheuk","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0305","first-page":"20","article-title":"Evaluation of cervical ripening between transcervical foley catheter versus hygroscopic cevical dilator (laminaria tent) for induction of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery: prospective randomized study","volume":"41","author":"Ahmad","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.3109\/01443618309081139","article-title":"Cervical ripening before induction of labour with prostaglandin E2 pessaries or a Foley's catheter","volume":"3","author":"Lewis","year":"1983","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04540.x","article-title":"The use of Foley's catheter in ripening the unfavourable cervix prior to induction of labour","volume":"87","author":"Ezimokhai","year":"1980","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500040737","article-title":"Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol","volume":"25","author":"Adeniji","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstetrics Gynaecolo J Inst Obstetrics Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2013.786030","article-title":"Effect of the Foley catheter and synchronous low dose misoprostol administration on cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"33","author":"Ugwu","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2 I","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90594-4","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter","volume":"172","author":"St. Onge","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1489","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13086","article-title":"Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre\u2010induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae","volume":"42","author":"Ahmed","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00392-2","article-title":"Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"81","author":"Niromanesh","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstetrics Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-4958.135223","article-title":"Induction of labor in patients with previous cesarean section with unfavorable cervix","volume":"28","author":"Meetei","year":"2014","journal-title":"JMS \u2013 J Med Soc"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0350","first-page":"19","article-title":"Comparison of the effects of transcervical ccatheter, laminaria and isosorbide mononitrate on cervical ripening","volume":"18","author":"Movahed","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Babol Univ Med Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0355","first-page":"140","article-title":"The transcervical foley catheter versus the vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel in the induction of labour in a previous one caesarean section \u2013 A clinical study","volume":"7","author":"Ziyauddin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.499447","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction","volume":"89","author":"Filho","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500231450","article-title":"Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"25","author":"Owolabi","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.12.006","article-title":"Hyaluronidase versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in high-risk term and post term pregnancies","volume":"88","author":"Surita","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0375","first-page":"28","article-title":"Effectiveness and infectious morbidity of outpatient cervical ripening with a Foley catheter","volume":"49","author":"McKenna","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3547-3","article-title":"Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"291","author":"Du","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.05.020","article-title":"A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter","volume":"207","author":"Cromi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0390","first-page":"247","article-title":"Evaluation of non-pharmacological method-transcervical foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"23","author":"Deo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Biomed Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0395","first-page":"149","article-title":"Comparison of vaginal misoprostol with foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor","volume":"10","author":"Roudsari","year":"2011","journal-title":"Iran J Pharm Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2014.173","article-title":"Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios","volume":"35","author":"Shechter-Maor","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1805","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.880880","article-title":"Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert","volume":"27","author":"Wang","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12489","article-title":"Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial","author":"Aduloju","year":"2016","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.02.010","article-title":"Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor","volume":"89","author":"Afolabi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstetrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0420","first-page":"257","article-title":"Two methods of cervix ripening: intracervical Foley catether and dinoprostone \u2013 Which one is actually more efficient?","volume":"36","author":"Kosinska-Kaczynska","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neuroendocrinol Lett"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845735","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/845735","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction","volume":"2015","author":"Noor","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0430","first-page":"75","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of oral misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley's catheter for induction of labour at term","volume":"11","author":"Sheikher","year":"2009","journal-title":"JK Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores","volume":"120","author":"Gelisen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0440","first-page":"346","article-title":"Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"32","author":"de Oliveira e Oliveira","year":"2010","journal-title":"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(95)80009-H","article-title":"Induction of labour at term in primigravidae with low Bishop's score: a comparison of three methods","volume":"58","author":"Orhue","year":"1995","journal-title":"Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.029","article-title":"Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study","volume":"204","author":"Cromi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0455","first-page":"180","article-title":"Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of foley catheter pre-induction of labor","volume":"84","author":"Jagielska","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0460","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.1.42.45","article-title":"Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-Cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter","volume":"12","author":"Ben-Aroya","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0465","first-page":"781","article-title":"The timing of adverse events with foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening; implications for outpatient use","volume":"31","author":"Sciscione","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.033","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"191","author":"Levy","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3287-4","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous Caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol","volume":"290","author":"Sanan\u00e8s","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0485","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000210528.32940.c6","article-title":"Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women","volume":"107","author":"Hoffman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0490","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","article-title":"Cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.587063","article-title":"Extra-amniotic balloon for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of weighted traction versus unweighted","volume":"25","author":"Lutgendorf","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014_bib0500","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.591459","article-title":"Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial","volume":"25","author":"Mei-Dan","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211517304451?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211517304451?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:39:55Z","timestamp":1759556395000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211517304451"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"references-count":100,"alternative-id":["S0301211517304451"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.731433900.793566543","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: A systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}