{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T02:39:47Z","timestamp":1792031987156,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,1]],"date-time":"2018-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525132800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,1]],"date-time":"2018-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525132800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,1]],"date-time":"2018-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525132800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,1]],"date-time":"2018-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525132800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,1]],"date-time":"2018-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525132800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,1]],"date-time":"2018-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525132800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,1]],"date-time":"2018-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525132800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,8]],"date-time":"2018-03-08T07:11:50Z","timestamp":1520493110000},"page":"52-57","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Current status and where to from here?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"224","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0478-1900","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gillian A.","family":"Ryan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7189-262X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah M.","family":"Nicholson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John J.","family":"Morrison","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12508","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success","volume":"121","author":"Knight","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2092","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1237498","article-title":"Evaluation of outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital","volume":"30","author":"Bellows","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.12.001","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting","volume":"216","author":"Tilden","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0020","unstructured":"RCOG greentop guideline No 45 birth after caesarean section october 2015. https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/globalassets\/documents\/guidelines\/gtg_45.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0025","unstructured":"Centres for disease control and prevention; births final data 2015."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0030","unstructured":"OECD data 2014. https:\/\/data.oecd.org\/healthcare\/caesarean-sections.htm."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0035","unstructured":"EURO-PERISTAT. European perinatal health report: the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europein 2010. http:\/\/www.europeristat.com\/reports\/european-perinatal-health-report-2010.html."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.08.015","article-title":"Factors influencing delivery mode for nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation during a 17-year period","volume":"147","author":"Sharma","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-12-123","article-title":"Regional variation in obstetrical intervention for hospital birth in the Republic of Ireland, 2005\u20132009","volume":"12","author":"Lutomski","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.012","article-title":"Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality","volume":"38","author":"Cheng","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0055","series-title":"RCOG the sentinel national caesarean section audit report- RCOG clinical effectiveness support unit","year":"2001"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0060","article-title":"Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth","author":"Dodd","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"115","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001192","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001192","article-title":"Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial","volume":"9","author":"Crowther","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000428647.67925.d3","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion No. 559: cesarean delivery on maternal request","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. National institute of child health and human development maternal-fetal medicine units network","volume":"107","author":"Silver","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0441-3","article-title":"Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review","volume":"15","author":"Lundgren","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251","article-title":"ACOG practise bulletin number 115: vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery","volume":"116","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0095","unstructured":"RCPI & institute of obstetricians and gynaecologists national clinical guidelines, delivery after previous caesarean section oct 2013. https:\/\/rcpi-live-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/5.-Delivery-after-previous-Caesarean-Section.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0100","series-title":"Birth after previous caesarean section guideline","author":"RANZCOG","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2017.04.005","article-title":"Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section \u2013 an online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland","volume":"50","author":"Bonzon","year":"2017","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-11-72","article-title":"Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study","volume":"12","author":"Cox","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109050","article-title":"Population adjustment of the definition of the vaginal birth after cesarean rate","volume":"183","author":"Reddy","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-012-1132-6","article-title":"Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990\u20132009","volume":"17","author":"Uddin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12479","article-title":"Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis","volume":"42","author":"Kok","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1144-0","article-title":"Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates","volume":"16","author":"Lundgren","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0135","first-page":"482","article-title":"Recent trends in vaginal birth after caesarean section","volume":"109","author":"Brick","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ir Med J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5","article-title":"National institutes of health consensus development conference panel. National institutes of health consensus development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights march 8\u201310, 2010","volume":"115","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f2de49","article-title":"New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted?","volume":"116","author":"Eden","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9","article-title":"Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery","volume":"111","author":"Mercer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0155","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights","volume":"191","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0173952","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0173952","article-title":"Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery","volume":"12","author":"Gr\u00fcnebaum","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"25","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.082","article-title":"Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?","volume":"192","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09060.x","article-title":"Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section","volume":"102","author":"Morrison","year":"1995","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9762","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-017-10206-3","article-title":"Cesarean section without medical indication and risks of childhood allergic disorder, attenuated by breastfeeding","volume":"7","author":"Chu","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2047-6310.2013.00151.x","article-title":"Caesarean delivery, caesarean delivery on maternal request and childhood overweight: a Chinese birth cohort study of 181 380 children","volume":"9","author":"Li","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pediatr Obes"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.1038\/ijo.2013.49","article-title":"Association of caesarean delivery with child adiposity from age 6 weeks to 15 years","volume":"37","author":"Blustein","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Obes (Lond)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0205","first-page":"1","article-title":"Childhood emotional and behavior problems and their associations with cesarean delivery","author":"Rutayisire","year":"2017","journal-title":"Rev Bras Psiquiatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0655-4","article-title":"Fear of childbirth and elective caesarean section: a population-based study","volume":"15","author":"St\u00f8rksen","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12229","article-title":"Improving VBAC rates: the combined impact of two management strategies","volume":"54","author":"Gardner","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.12466","article-title":"The effect of evidence-based scripted midwifery counseling on women's choices about mode of birth after a previous cesarean","volume":"61","author":"Chinkam","year":"2016","journal-title":"Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2005.01496.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women's perceptions","volume":"16","author":"Meddings","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-12-85","article-title":"\u2018Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)","volume":"12","author":"Lundgren","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1106","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903551434","article-title":"Randomised trial of assigned mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section\u2013impact on maternal psychological dynamics","volume":"23","author":"Law","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7200080","article-title":"Rates of successful vaginal delivery after caesarean for patients with private versus public insurance","volume":"19","author":"Wagner","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.005","article-title":"VBAC: a medicolegal perspective","volume":"38","author":"Bonanno","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2016.08.738","article-title":"Economic evaluations comparing a trial of labor to an elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review","volume":"20","author":"Rogers","year":"2017","journal-title":"Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011_bib0255","first-page":"CD004906","article-title":"Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth","volume":"7","author":"Dodd","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211518300678?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211518300678?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T19:28:13Z","timestamp":1721330893000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211518300678"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]},"references-count":51,"alternative-id":["S0301211518300678"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Current status and where to from here?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}