{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T02:36:09Z","timestamp":1778553369574,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,1]],"date-time":"2018-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1535760000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,1]],"date-time":"2018-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1535760000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,11]],"date-time":"2018-06-11T11:49:14Z","timestamp":1528717754000},"page":"82-86","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"special_numbering":"C","title":["The relationship between intrapartum cerebroplacental ratio and adverse perinatal outcomes in term fetuses"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"228","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8577-9065","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Natthicha","family":"Chainarong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6357-2490","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chusana","family":"Petpichetchian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F1","DOI":"10.1136\/fn.71.1.F1","article-title":"Perinatal asphyxia in less developed countries","volume":"71","author":"Costello","year":"1994","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed."},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13319","article-title":"Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term","volume":"43","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"May (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000232","article-title":"A practical approach to fetal growth restriction","volume":"123","author":"Copel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.022","article-title":"Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"206","author":"Berkley","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"December (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(88)90066-4","article-title":"Fetal cerebral circulation assessment by Doppler ultrasound in normal and pathological pregnancies","volume":"29","author":"Arbeille","year":"1988","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"issue":"December (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1541","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90398-0","article-title":"Accuracy of the middle-cerebral-to-umbilical-artery resistance index ratio in the prediction of neonatal outcome in patients at high risk for fetal and neonatal complications","volume":"171","author":"Arias","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00018","article-title":"Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"79","author":"Gramellini","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"March (3 Pt 1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70283-8","article-title":"The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"180","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0045","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"February (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14647","article-title":"Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"45","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"July (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0055","article-title":"Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission?","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"February (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0060","article-title":"Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study","volume":"208","author":"Prior","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","article-title":"Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"117","author":"Cruz-Martinez","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14714","article-title":"An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"45","author":"Figueras","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"September (9)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2005.24.9.1223","article-title":"Cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: evaluating the impact of using gestational age-specific reference values","volume":"24","author":"Odibo","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med."},{"issue":"February (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited","volume":"21","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4088","article-title":"Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements","volume":"30","author":"Ebbing","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.019","article-title":"Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy","volume":"192","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"August (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.04.030","article-title":"Intrapartum management of category II fetal heart rate tracings: towards standardization of care","volume":"209","author":"Clark","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"October (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2008.00284.x","article-title":"The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines","volume":"37","author":"Macones","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs."},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1016\/S1095-6433(98)01010-1","article-title":"Metabolic and circulatory adaptations to chronic hypoxia in the fetus","volume":"119","author":"Richardson","year":"1998","journal-title":"Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol."},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00652.x","article-title":"Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"19","author":"Severi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211518302951?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211518302951?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:42:10Z","timestamp":1759556530000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211518302951"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"references-count":22,"alternative-id":["S0301211518302951"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The relationship between intrapartum cerebroplacental ratio and adverse perinatal outcomes in term fetuses","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}