{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T17:46:14Z","timestamp":1782927974814,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,21]],"date-time":"2019-02-21T06:54:44Z","timestamp":1550732084000},"page":"88-92","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Safety and efficacy of spider anchoring device for apical repair in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"235","author":[{"given":"Naama Marcus","family":"Braun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wael","family":"Andraos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Bettin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","article-title":"Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence","volume":"89","author":"Olsen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00829-9","article-title":"Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapsed and urinary incontinence","volume":"189","author":"Clark","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1542-9","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review","volume":"22","author":"Maher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0020","first-page":"1089","article-title":"The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review","volume":"55","author":"Ganatra","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"April 4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0025","first-page":"CD004014","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women","volume":"30","author":"Maher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"547","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0030","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy","volume":"211","author":"Unger","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-013-1084-9","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with \"double crown\" versus \"sutures and tackers\" in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair","volume":"17","author":"Muysoms","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hernia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-009-0763-1","article-title":"Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques","volume":"24","author":"Wassenaar","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-004-9125-1","article-title":"A new device for bone anchor fixation in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: the Franciscan laparoscopic bone anchor inserter","volume":"19","author":"van der Weiden","year":"2005","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.02.014","article-title":"Satisfaction, quality of life and lumbar pain following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: suture vs. tackers","volume":"187","author":"Vieillefosse","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2162-3","article-title":"Mesh pullout force: comparative study of different deployment techniques in a sheep model","volume":"25","author":"Alcalay","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1349-0","article-title":"Trocarless system for mesh attachment in pelvic organ prolapse repair\u20141-year evaluation","volume":"22","author":"Alcalay","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2159-y","article-title":"Cystocele repair with single incision trocarless mesh system","volume":"25","author":"Marcus-Braun","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0656","article-title":"Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: anatomical results and patient satisfaction","volume":"42","author":"Fink","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2008.05.009","article-title":"A prospective study to evaluate the anatomic and functional outcome of a transobturator mesh kit (prolift anterior) for symptomatic cystocele repair","volume":"15","author":"Hinoul","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1307","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0953-3","article-title":"Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes","volume":"20","author":"Gerten","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0721-9","article-title":"Management of complications arising from transvaginal mesh kit procedures: a tertiary referral center\u2019s experience","volume":"20","author":"Hurtado","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318237edc4","article-title":"Colporrhaphy compared with mesh or graft-reinforced vaginal paravaginal repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Menefee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"703","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0095","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits","volume":"199","author":"Ridgeway","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","article-title":"Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"309","author":"Nygaard","year":"2013","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2369-y","article-title":"Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy","volume":"25","author":"Sarlos","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15891","article-title":"Long-term follow-up of sacrocolpopexy mesh implants at two time intervals at least 1 year apart using 4D transperineal ultrasound","volume":"49","author":"Eisenberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31596-3","article-title":"PROSPECT study group. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT)","volume":"389","author":"Glazener","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519300806?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519300806?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T16:59:12Z","timestamp":1782925152000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211519300806"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["S0301211519300806"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Safety and efficacy of spider anchoring device for apical repair in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Retrospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.013","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}