{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T19:44:34Z","timestamp":1791488674593,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559347200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559347200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,22]],"date-time":"2020-04-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1587513600000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":326,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique","award":["AOM2012"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AOM2012"]}]},{"name":"national agency for drug safety and health products","award":["AAP-2014-030"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AAP-2014-030"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,8]],"date-time":"2019-04-08T11:33:38Z","timestamp":1554723218000},"page":"68-73","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Risk of cesarean after induction of labor in twin compared to singleton pregnancies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"237","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5590-1066","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"C.","family":"Loscul","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3921-5573","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"T.","family":"Schmitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1614-0174","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"P.","family":"Blanc-Petitjean","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Goffinet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0891-1063","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"C.","family":"Le Ray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0005","series-title":"Enqu\u00eate nationale p\u00e9rinatale. Rapport 2016, Les naissances et les \u00e9tablissements, situation et \u00e9volution depuis 2010","author":"Coulm","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0010","volume":"Volume 66","author":"Martin","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S7","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(09)73555-0","article-title":"L\u2019augmentation des naissances g\u00e9mellaires et cons\u00e9quences sur la sant\u00e9","volume":"38","author":"Blondel","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200006000-00022","article-title":"Marternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations","volume":"95","author":"Conde-Agueldo","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199803000-00013","article-title":"How does multiple pregnancy affect maternal mortality and morbidity?","volume":"41","author":"S\u00e9nat","year":"1998","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"October (14)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1214939","article-title":"For the twin birth study collaborative group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"369","author":"Barrett, M.B., B.Ch., M.D","year":"2013","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0035","series-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric care consensus No 1","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2014"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002048","article-title":"JUmeaux MODe d\u02bcAccouchement (JUMODA) Study Group and the Groupe de Recherche en Obst\u00e9trique et Gyn\u00e9cologie (GROG). Association Between Planned Cesarean Delivery and Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Twin Pregnancies","volume":"129","author":"Schmitz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045","article-title":"French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"156","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i4353","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4353","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"354","author":"Cheong-See","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"18","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1804","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.804047","article-title":"Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?","volume":"26","author":"Okby","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3-4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0060","first-page":"137","article-title":"Is the protocol for induction of labor in singletons applicable to twin gestations?","volume":"58","author":"Wolfe","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31825f3643","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin compared with singleton pregnancies","volume":"120","author":"Taylor","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2014.05.011","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies; risk factors for failure","volume":"44","author":"Ghassani","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"January (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1201-8","article-title":"The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study","volume":"17","author":"Mei-Dan","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"November (17)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0080","article-title":"Labour induction practices in France: a population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units","author":"Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"December (24)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3999","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1152252","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin gestation: lessons from a population based study","volume":"29","author":"Hamou","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"June (15)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0566-4","article-title":"Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study","volume":"16","author":"Jonsson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"December (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000544","article-title":"Groupe de Recherche en Obst\u00e9trique et Gyn\u00e9cologie (GROG). Outpatient cervical ripening by nitric oxide donors for prolonged pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"124","author":"Schmitz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"December (8)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0105","first-page":"818","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy term and beyond: guidelines for clinical practice - text of the guidelines","volume":"40","author":"CNGOF (College National des Gynecologues et Obstetriciens Francais)","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0110","series-title":"Induction of Labor","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0155692","article-title":"Is cesarean delivery preferable in twin pregnancies at 36 weeks gestation?","volume":"11","author":"Dong","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519301605?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519301605?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:45:16Z","timestamp":1759556716000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211519301605"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["S0301211519301605"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Risk of cesarean after induction of labor in twin compared to singleton pregnancies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}