{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,25]],"date-time":"2025-10-25T14:20:20Z","timestamp":1761402020358,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,1]],"date-time":"2019-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1564617600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,1]],"date-time":"2019-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1564617600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,29]],"date-time":"2019-05-29T02:42:57Z","timestamp":1559097777000},"page":"35-38","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Predictors of patient preference for mode of delivery following an obstetric anal sphincter injury"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"239","author":[{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Cole","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Supriya","family":"Bulchandani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"year":"2015","series-title":"The management of third and fourth-degree perineal tears. Green top guideline no. 29","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.920","article-title":"Results of endosonographic imaging of the anal sphincter 2-7 days after primary repair of third or fourth degree obstetric sphincter tears","volume":"22","author":"Starck","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-007-9157-4","article-title":"Does the St Mark\u2019s incontinence score reflect patients\u2019 perceptions? A review of 390 patients","volume":"51","author":"Maeda","year":"2008","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.12.002","article-title":"Factors that influence patient preference for mode of delivery following an obstetric anal sphincter injury","volume":"221","author":"Long","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2014.954098","article-title":"The management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): a national postal questionnaire survey in hospitals in the UK","volume":"35","author":"Ismail","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2014.911835","article-title":"Management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in subsequent pregnancy","volume":"34","author":"Evans","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7478","article-title":"Defects on endoanal ultrasound and anal incontinence after primary repair of fourth-degree anal sphincter rupture: a study of the anal sphincter complex and puborectal muscle","volume":"34","author":"Sakse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4369","article-title":"Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage","volume":"90","author":"Oberwalder","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12508","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success","volume":"121","author":"Knight","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12174","article-title":"Racial and ethnic differences in the likelihood of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery","volume":"42","author":"Cheng","year":"2015","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0055","first-page":"443","article-title":"Ethnic disparities in repeat caesarean rates at Auckland Hospital","volume":"53","author":"Wise","year":"2013","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1398","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90898-H","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section or repeat cesarean section: medical risks or social realities?","volume":"162","author":"Kirk","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1438","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01112.x","article-title":"Women\u2019s experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks","volume":"113","author":"Emmett","year":"2006","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519302635?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519302635?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:45:06Z","timestamp":1759556706000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211519302635"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"references-count":13,"alternative-id":["S0301211519302635"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Predictors of patient preference for mode of delivery following an obstetric anal sphincter injury","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.041","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Crown Copyright \u00a9 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}