{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,5]],"date-time":"2025-10-05T00:30:07Z","timestamp":1759624207011,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,1]],"date-time":"2019-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1567296000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,1]],"date-time":"2019-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1567296000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]],"date-time":"2019-07-09T11:19:41Z","timestamp":1562671181000},"page":"187-191","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["National-survey for evaluation of the best screening method of late fetal growth restriction in low risk pregnancy: A prospective study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"240","author":[{"given":"Catarina","family":"Policiano","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Catarina","family":"Reis-de-Carvalho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nuno","family":"Clode","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lu\u00eds","family":"Mendes Gra\u00e7a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0005","first-page":"35","article-title":"The changing pattern of fetal death, 1961-1988","volume":"79","author":"Fretts","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10018","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00837-5","article-title":"Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030","volume":"387","author":"Lawn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1806","article-title":"Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestation age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?","volume":"25","author":"Lindqvist","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f108","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f108","article-title":"Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study","volume":"346","author":"Gardosi","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.004","article-title":"Fetal growth screening by fundal height measurement","volume":"23","author":"Morse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.516285","article-title":"Fundal height: a useful screening tool for fetal growth?","volume":"24","author":"Sparks","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.940","article-title":"Accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complications prior to induction of labor","volume":"23","author":"Ben-Haroush","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0040","article-title":"Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks\u2019 gestation)","author":"Bricker","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0045","unstructured":"Direc\u00e7\u00e3o Geral de Sa\u00fade. Programa Nacional para a Vigil\u00e2ncia da Gravidez de Baixo Risco in https:\/\/www.dgs.pt\/em-destaque\/programa-nacional-para-a-vigilancia-da-gravidez-de-baixo-risco.aspx."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14915","article-title":"Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks\u2019 gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE)","volume":"46","author":"Roma","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"year":"2016","series-title":"WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva","author":"World Health Organization","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0055"},{"issue":"10008","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14816","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks","volume":"45","author":"Fadigas","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1426","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1317741","article-title":"Small-for-gestational-age babies of low-risk term pregnancies: does antenatal detection matter?","volume":"31","author":"Policiano","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.02.008","article-title":"Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes","volume":"218","author":"Madden","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.043","article-title":"Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies","volume":"215","author":"Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0085","first-page":"323","article-title":"Morbidity and mortality in Small-for-Gestational-Age infants: a secondary analysis of nine MFMU network studies","volume":"34","author":"Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2009.150","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes associated with planned vaginal versus planned primary cesarean delivery","volume":"30","author":"Geller","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.043","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"220","author":"Caradeux","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519303367?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519303367?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:48:00Z","timestamp":1759556880000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211519303367"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"references-count":19,"alternative-id":["S0301211519303367"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"National-survey for evaluation of the best screening method of late fetal growth restriction in low risk pregnancy: A prospective study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}