{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,29]],"date-time":"2026-03-29T01:14:46Z","timestamp":1774746886229,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,13]],"date-time":"2019-11-13T11:38:02Z","timestamp":1573645082000},"page":"76-80","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Comparison of cervical length measured by POP-Q C-D and MRI: Why is POP-Q C-D not accurate?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"244","author":[{"given":"Lian","family":"Tang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kedan","family":"Liao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wenxuan","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Feng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6769-3479","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ping","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1708-3047","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chunlin","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0","article-title":"The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"175","author":"Bump","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2252-2","article-title":"POP-Q 2.0: its time has come!","volume":"25","author":"Harmanli","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"June (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"881","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3464-7","article-title":"Putting POP-Q to the test: does C - D = cervical length?","volume":"29","author":"Williams","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"January","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0020","first-page":"1","article-title":"Is cervical length evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography helpful in detecting true preterm labor?","volume":"22","author":"Maia","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"March (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0025","first-page":"23","article-title":"Mid-pregnancy ultrasonographic cervical length measurement (A predictor of mode and timing of delivery): an observational study","volume":"12","author":"Thangaraj","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Family Reprod Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2255-z","article-title":"Comparison of the POP-Q examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and direct anatomic measurement of cervical length","volume":"25","author":"Dancz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"August (8)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1747-6","article-title":"Is cervical elongation associated with pelvic organ prolapse?","volume":"23","author":"Berger","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"August (8)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1131-3","article-title":"Hypertrophic cervical elongation: clinical and histological correlations","volume":"21","author":"Ibeanu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2016.01.008","article-title":"Study of prolapse-induced cervical elongation","volume":"38","author":"Geoffrion","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"Novemeber (12)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-018-0862-4","article-title":"Use of dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor in the assessment of anterior compartment disorders","volume":"19","author":"Gupta","year":"2018","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"issue":"July (7-8)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0055","first-page":"593","article-title":"Preoperative functional explorations of genital prolapse (urodynamics, dynamic MRI)","volume":"46","author":"Pizzoferrato","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"September","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.05.031","article-title":"Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse compared to physical examination findings","volume":"119","author":"Lin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.09.015","article-title":"Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines","volume":"69","author":"Rosenkrantz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3181951e98","article-title":"Comparison of estimated cervical length from the pelvic organ prolapse quantification exam and actual cervical length at hysterectomy","volume":"15","author":"Finamore","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Pelvic Med Surg"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2016.10.012","article-title":"Defining cervical elongation: a prospective observational study","volume":"39","author":"Nosti","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0080","first-page":"75","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) \u2212 a new era in pelvic prolapse staging","volume":"4","author":"Persu","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Med Life"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3336-1","article-title":"Use of the Pelvic Organ Quantification System (POP-Q) in published articles of peer-reviewed journals","volume":"28","author":"Boyd","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"S6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S39","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23740","article-title":"How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system?","volume":"37","author":"Madhu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"May (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0095","first-page":"568","article-title":"Is there an association between body mass index and cervical length? Implications for obesity and cervical length management in pregnancy","volume":"34","author":"Venkatesh","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"April (5)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0100","first-page":"471","article-title":"Association among maternal obesity, cervical length, and preterm birth","volume":"34","author":"Palatnik","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"October","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.08.011","article-title":"Risk factors for coexistence of cervical elongation in uterine prolapse","volume":"229","author":"Hsiao","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01627989","article-title":"The normal uterus on magnetic resonance imaging and variations associated with the hormonal state","volume":"13","author":"Bartoli","year":"1991","journal-title":"Surg Radiol Anat"},{"issue":"August (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mric.2017.03.003","article-title":"MR imaging of the pelvic floor","volume":"25","author":"Khatri","year":"2017","journal-title":"Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519304725?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519304725?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:46:45Z","timestamp":1759556805000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211519304725"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["S0301211519304725"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparison of cervical length measured by POP-Q C-D and MRI: Why is POP-Q C-D not accurate?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.016","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}