{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]],"date-time":"2026-03-26T15:48:35Z","timestamp":1774540115312,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003006","name":"Eidgen\u00f6ssische Technische Hochschule Z\u00fcrich","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003006","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,2]],"date-time":"2019-11-02T03:18:15Z","timestamp":1572664695000},"page":"25-30","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Prediction of duration of labor based on biomechanical measurements of the cervix: A preliminary study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"244","author":[{"given":"Eline","family":"Salaets","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jute","family":"Richter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e31823e0c69","article-title":"Failed induction of labor: strategies to improve the success rates","volume":"66","author":"Talaulikar","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001083","article-title":"Predicting cesarean delivery after induction of labor among nulliparous women at term","volume":"126","author":"Tolcher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11195","article-title":"Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?","volume":"40","author":"Levy","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000215988.23224.e4","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term","volume":"108","author":"Allen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.03.004","article-title":"Women\u2019s perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour\u2014a questionnaire-based study","volume":"123","author":"Shetty","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1196\/annals.1389.004","article-title":"In vivo characterization of the mechanics of human uterine cervices","volume":"1101","author":"Bauer","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann N Y Acad Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.media.2005.06.001","article-title":"Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study","volume":"10","author":"Mazza","year":"2006","journal-title":"Med Image Anal"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2015.02.065","article-title":"The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy","volume":"48","author":"Myers","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Biomech"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4116","article-title":"Cervical softening occurs early in pregnancy: characterization of cervical stiffness in 100 healthy women using the aspiration technique","volume":"33","author":"Badir","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0050","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1331024","article-title":"The bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review","volume":"30","author":"Kolkman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00725-7","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay","volume":"189","author":"Reis","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","author":"Ramirez","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1090-x","article-title":"Pre-induction translabial ultrasound measurements in predicting mode of delivery compared to bishop score: a cross-sectional study","volume":"16","author":"Khazardoost","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0075","first-page":"1","article-title":"Can measurement of cervical length, fetal head position and posterior cervical angle be an alternative method to Bishop score in the prediction of successful labor induction?","volume":"7058","author":"Gokturk","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.04.050","article-title":"Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis","volume":"197","author":"Hatfield","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3","article-title":"The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"286","author":"Teixeira","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9010","article-title":"Prediction of preterm birth using the cervical consistency index","volume":"38","author":"Parra-Saavedra","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4260","article-title":"In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy","volume":"34","author":"Mazza","year":"2014","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050412331312230","article-title":"Electrical impedance measurements: an objective measure of prelabor cervical change","volume":"14","author":"O\u2019Connell","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.03.006","article-title":"Light-induced fluorescence of the human cervix decreases after prostaglandin application for induction of labor at term","volume":"123","author":"Fittkow","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02684197","article-title":"The pipette aspiration applied to the local stiffness measurement of soft tissues","volume":"25","author":"Aoki","year":"1997","journal-title":"Ann Biomed Eng"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2012.11.020","article-title":"A novel procedure for the mechanical characterization of the uterine cervix during pregnancy","volume":"27","author":"Badir","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Mech Behav Biomed Mater"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.media.2007.10.001","article-title":"In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver","volume":"12","author":"Nava","year":"2008","journal-title":"Med Image Anal"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000270112.05025.1d","article-title":"Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth","volume":"110","author":"Berghella","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02849968","article-title":"Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction","volume":"24","author":"Yanik","year":"2007","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1159\/000433429","article-title":"Definition of failed induction of labor and its predictive factors: two unsolved issues of an everyday clinical situation","volume":"38","author":"Ban\u00f5s","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20152","article-title":"Cervical consistency index and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor at term","volume":"53","author":"Migliorelli","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519305019?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519305019?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:46:07Z","timestamp":1759556767000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211519305019"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"references-count":28,"alternative-id":["S0301211519305019"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Prediction of duration of labor based on biomechanical measurements of the cervix: A preliminary study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.045","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}