{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]],"date-time":"2026-03-24T13:56:42Z","timestamp":1774360602879,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,4]],"date-time":"2019-11-04T11:35:45Z","timestamp":1572867345000},"page":"21-24","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Successful versus unsuccessful instrumental deliveries\u2014Predictors and obstetric outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"244","author":[{"given":"Abdullatif","family":"Elfituri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tamal","family":"Datta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Harry R.","family":"Hubbard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8327-0716","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ramesh","family":"Ganapathy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0005","series-title":"Maternity services statistics","author":"NHSdigital","year":"2017"},{"issue":"November (6)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120085500","article-title":"A matched controlled study of Kielland\u2019s forceps for transverse arrest of the fetal vertex","volume":"21","author":"Schiff","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bbf3be","article-title":"Failed operative vaginal delivery","volume":"114","author":"Alexander","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0020","series-title":"Operative vaginal delivery. Green\u2010top guideline no 62 royal college of obstetricians and gynaecologists","author":"Bahl","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0025","series-title":"Operative vaginal delivery. Technical bulletin No. 196. Washington, DC","author":"ACOG","year":"1994"},{"issue":"October (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005545.pub2","article-title":"Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births","volume":"8","author":"Majoko","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.073","article-title":"Factors predictive of failed operative vaginal delivery","volume":"191","author":"Gopalani","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000188","article-title":"Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success","volume":"123","author":"Aiken","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"February (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00449-8","article-title":"Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"89","author":"Crane","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"January (1)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0050","first-page":"39","article-title":"Obesity as a risk factor for cesarean in a low-risk population","volume":"97","author":"Kaiser","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"October (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117351","article-title":"The effect of the increasing prevalence of maternal obesity on perinatal morbidity","volume":"185","author":"Lu","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"July (7)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2003.00162.x","article-title":"Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications","volume":"82","author":"Al-Kadri","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.05.052","article-title":"Dystocia increases with advancing maternal age","volume":"195","author":"Treacy","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"March (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001273","article-title":"Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery in a contemporary obstetric cohort","volume":"127","author":"Palatnik","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-200001000-00005","article-title":"Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance","volume":"38","author":"Aron","year":"2000","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.85.5.625","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California","volume":"85","author":"Braveman","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.08.015","article-title":"Factors influencing delivery mode for nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation during a 17-year period","volume":"147","author":"Sharma","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000154889.47063.84","article-title":"Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome","volume":"105","author":"Senecal","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.3.172.177","article-title":"Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position","volume":"12","author":"Akmal","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"November (11)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0100","article-title":"Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery","volume":"10","author":"O\u2019Mahony","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"September (3)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0105","article-title":"Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience","volume":"197","author":"Ben-Haroush","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"October (2)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.10.002","article-title":"Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes","volume":"134","author":"Abenhaim","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000446","article-title":"Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery","author":"Johanson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"February","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0120","first-page":"1","article-title":"Differences in outcomes between cesarean section in the second versus the first stages of labor","volume":"22","author":"Vitner","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"April (4)","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe","article-title":"Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor","volume":"109","author":"Alexander","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519305068?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519305068?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:45:49Z","timestamp":1759556749000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211519305068"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"references-count":25,"alternative-id":["S0301211519305068"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Successful versus unsuccessful instrumental deliveries\u2014Predictors and obstetric outcomes","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.050","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}