{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,5]],"date-time":"2025-10-05T00:29:50Z","timestamp":1759624190723,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,27]],"date-time":"2019-11-27T11:39:55Z","timestamp":1574854795000},"page":"180-184","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"special_numbering":"C","title":["What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"244","author":[{"given":"Luca","family":"Giannella","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jacopo","family":"Di Giuseppe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sonia","family":"Prandi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Delli Carpini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dimitrios","family":"Tsiroglou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0074-5996","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrea","family":"Ciavattini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1665","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(17)30700-3","article-title":"Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Arbyn","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0010","first-page":"219","article-title":"Procedures of cervical conization: a national survey among Italian colposcopy units","volume":"68","author":"Sopracordevole","year":"2016","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12105","article-title":"Image assessment of cervical dimensions after LLETZ: a prospective observational study","volume":"120","author":"Carcopino","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1159\/000345864","article-title":"Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"75","author":"Papoutsis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0025","article-title":"Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study","author":"Alder","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.03.021","article-title":"Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins","volume":"201","author":"Ayhan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.04.002","article-title":"Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients","volume":"122","author":"Sun","year":"2009","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0040","first-page":"2569","article-title":"Risk factors for incomplete excision after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in abnormal cervical cytology","volume":"18","author":"Yingyongwatthanawitthaya","year":"2017","journal-title":"Asian Pac J Cancer Prev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.05.027","article-title":"Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconisation management","volume":"107","author":"Chen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e54","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2016.27.e54","article-title":"Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"27","author":"Kawano","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0055","first-page":"586","article-title":"Factors associated with cone margin involvement in CIN patients undergoing conization-equivalent electrosurgical procedure","volume":"79","author":"Costa","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0060","first-page":"481","article-title":"Clinicopathologic predictors of incomplete excision after loop electrosurgical excision for cervical preneoplasia","volume":"6","author":"Kietpeerakool","year":"2005","journal-title":"Asian Pac J Cancer Prev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.5152\/jtgga.2016.16066","article-title":"Optimal cone size to predict positive surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC) and the risk factors for residual disease","volume":"17","author":"\u00d6z","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02501.x","article-title":"The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ)","volume":"117","author":"Phadnis","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"120","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0075","first-page":"166","article-title":"Colposcopic terminology of the international federation for cervical pathology and colposcopy","volume":"2012","author":"Bornstein","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"year":"2000","series-title":"Applied logistic regression","author":"Hosmer","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0080"},{"issue":"224","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0085","first-page":"137","article-title":"Update of the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) performance standards for the practice of colposcopy","volume":"2018","author":"Petry","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0090","first-page":"691","article-title":"Cervical cone measurements and residual disease in LLETZ conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"25","author":"Papoutsis","year":"2011","journal-title":"In Vivo"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12025","article-title":"The appropriate cone depth to avoid endocervical margin involvement is dependent on age and disease severity","volume":"92","author":"Bae","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1188","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35468-8","article-title":"Executive Council of the Society of Canadian Colposcopists. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology","volume":"34","author":"Bentley","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000279","article-title":"Predictors of positive margins at time of loop electrosurgical excision procedure","volume":"21","author":"Liss","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Low Genit Tract Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0110","article-title":"Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease","volume":"11","author":"Kyrgiou","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000340","article-title":"Cervical excision procedure: a trend of decreasing length of excision observed in a multicenter survey","volume":"21","author":"Ciavattini","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Low Genit Tract Dis"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519305329?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211519305329?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:48:03Z","timestamp":1759556883000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211519305329"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["S0301211519305329"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}