{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T22:38:04Z","timestamp":1783723084716,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,1]],"date-time":"2020-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1583020800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,1]],"date-time":"2020-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1583020800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,16]],"date-time":"2020-01-16T11:26:56Z","timestamp":1579174016000},"page":"79-85","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"special_numbering":"C","title":["The test accuracy of antenatal ultrasound definitions of fetal macrosomia to predict birth injury: A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"246","author":[{"given":"Rebecca","family":"Robinson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5794-7324","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kate F.","family":"Walker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Victoria A.","family":"White","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"George J.","family":"Bugg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kym I.E.","family":"Snell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nia W.","family":"Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13268","article-title":"Fetal macrosomia: a problem in need of a policy","volume":"43","author":"Campbell","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0010","first-page":"340","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome following ultrasound diagnosis of macrosomia","volume":"78","author":"Delpapa","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0015","first-page":"169","article-title":"ACOG issues guidelines on fetal macrosomia. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","volume":"64","author":"Chatfield","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am Fam Phys"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.01052.x","article-title":"Fetal macrosomia and pregnancy outcomes","volume":"49","author":"Ju","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2003.12.002","article-title":"Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application","volume":"28","author":"Gardosi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"9780","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1855","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60364-4","article-title":"A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles","volume":"377","author":"Mikolajczyk","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.4103\/2141-9248.122098","article-title":"Fetal macrosomia: risk factors, maternal, and perinatal outcome","volume":"3","author":"Mohammadbeigi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ann Med Health Sci Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0040","first-page":"55","article-title":"Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?","volume":"9","author":"Combs","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13517","article-title":"Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"123","author":"Malin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bjog Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2009.28.5.617","article-title":"Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used?","volume":"28","author":"Melamed","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1159\/000299475","article-title":"Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia","volume":"27","author":"Hoopmann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1372","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.302","article-title":"Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk","volume":"188","author":"Boulet","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0065","first-page":"CD000938","article-title":"Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia","volume":"5","author":"Boulvain","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0059202","article-title":"The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews","volume":"8","author":"Turner","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-6-9","article-title":"Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"6","author":"Whiting","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h5527","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h5527","article-title":"STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"351","author":"Bossuyt","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12517","article-title":"When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes","volume":"121","author":"Malin","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13282","article-title":"When is birthweight at term (\u226537 weeks\u2019 gestation) abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for childhood and adult outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Malin","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1896","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280215592269","article-title":"Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data","volume":"26","author":"Takwoingi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2081","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6471","article-title":"Summarising and validating test accuracy results across multiple studies for use in clinical practice","volume":"34","author":"Riley","year":"2015","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.4274\/tjod.80388","article-title":"Six-year incidence and some features of cases of brachial plexus injury in a tertiary referral center","volume":"12","author":"Eken","year":"2015","journal-title":"Turk J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00067-1","article-title":"Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabetic mothers","volume":"88","author":"Cohen","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00140-9","article-title":"Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus","volume":"105","author":"Weiner","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0125","first-page":"E99","article-title":"Association of fetal abdominal-head circumference size difference with shoulder dystocia: a multicenter study","volume":"5","author":"Endres","year":"2015","journal-title":"AJP Rep"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0130","article-title":"Accelerated abdominal circumference growth (> 75th%ile) in average gestational age fetuses increases risk of shoulder dystocia","volume":"17","author":"Bailis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(87)80033-9","article-title":"Early 3rd-Trimester ultrasound screening in gestational diabetes to determine the risk of macrosomia and labor dystocia at term","volume":"157","author":"Bochner","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0140","first-page":"478","article-title":"Correlation of increased fetal asymmetry with shoulder dystocia in the nondiabetic woman with suspected macrosomia","volume":"54","author":"Rajan","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2007.26.11.1523","article-title":"Sonographic fetal asymmetry predicts shoulder dystocia","volume":"26","author":"Miller","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.11604\/pamj.2013.14.111.1979","article-title":"Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia","volume":"14","author":"Chaabane","year":"2013","journal-title":"Pan Afr Med J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0155","first-page":"159","article-title":"Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients","volume":"60","author":"Elliott","year":"1982","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0160","first-page":"71","article-title":"Counseling for fetal macrosomia: an estimated fetal weight of 4,000 g is excessively low","volume":"32","author":"Peleg","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.256","article-title":"Fetal abdominal circumference (AC) of 35cm or greater predicts shoulder dystocia in fetuses presumed to have estimated fetal weight (EFW) appropriate for gestational age (AGA)","volume":"210","author":"Buikema","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001097","article-title":"Large-for-gestational-age ultrasound diagnosis and risk for cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus","volume":"126","author":"Scifres","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0175","article-title":"The antenatal and peripartum management of pregnancies with macrosomic babies weighing >5000 g at two tertiary hospitals: a Dublin experience","volume":"95","author":"Basit","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.145","article-title":"The association between head circumference (HC)> 90th percentile at term and pregnancy outcome","volume":"210","author":"Aviram","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-993858","article-title":"The incidence and severity of shoulder dystocia correlates with a sonographic measurement of asymmetry in patients with diabetes","volume":"16","author":"Cohen","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.10.386","article-title":"Detection of shoulder dystocia among newborns with birth weight of 4,500 g or more: seven years experience","volume":"204","author":"Chauhan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0195","first-page":"S129","article-title":"Utility of fetal abdominal circumference (AC) in predicting disease progression and perinatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)","volume":"208","author":"Chavan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1345","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-1888-8","article-title":"Role of fetal abdominal circumference as a prognostic parameter of perinatal complications","volume":"284","author":"Kehl","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0205","first-page":"55","article-title":"Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational-age fetus at term - does it make a difference","volume":"79","author":"Levine","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.10.359","article-title":"Prediction of fetal macrosomia in term infants of diabetic mothers based on early third trimester ultrasound","volume":"201","author":"Nelson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0215","first-page":"17","article-title":"Ultrasonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia - Association with cesarean delivery","volume":"45","author":"Parry","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0220","article-title":"Does an enlarged abdominal circumference predict morbidity for patients diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GDM) using the IADPSG criteria?","author":"Simpson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019_bib0225","first-page":"9","article-title":"[Fetal macrosomia: mode of delivery]","volume":"43","author":"Tatarova","year":"2004","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520300270?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520300270?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:46:56Z","timestamp":1759556816000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211520300270"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"references-count":45,"alternative-id":["S0301211520300270"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The test accuracy of antenatal ultrasound definitions of fetal macrosomia to predict birth injury: A systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.01.019","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}