{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T05:50:00Z","timestamp":1784699400033,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598918400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598918400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,9]],"date-time":"2020-06-09T21:29:02Z","timestamp":1591738142000},"page":"62-69","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":76,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Maternal and neonatal outcomes following a prolonged second stage of labor: A meta-analysis of observational studies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"252","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4510-1633","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vasilios","family":"Pergialiotis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5088-5458","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ioannis","family":"Bellos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aris","family":"Antsaklis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angeliki","family":"Papapanagiotou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dimitrios","family":"Loutradis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7108-211X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"George","family":"Daskalakis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0148343","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","article-title":"The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014","volume":"11","author":"Betr\u00e1n","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13509","article-title":"A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study","volume":"123","author":"Souza","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1747","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13708","article-title":"Factors associated with emergency cesarean delivery during induction of labor in nulliparous women aged 35 years or older at term","volume":"44","author":"Nakano","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2014-0357","article-title":"Cesarean delivery among women with prolonged labor induction","volume":"44","author":"Highley","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0188074","article-title":"Indications and determinants of caesarean section delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Matlab, Bangladesh","volume":"12","author":"Begum","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182704880","article-title":"Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice kennedy shriver national institute of child health and human development, society for maternal-fetal medicine, and american college of obstetricians and gynecologists workshop","volume":"120","author":"Spong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13753.x","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal morbidity in relation to the length of the second stage of labour","volume":"99","author":"Saunders","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006","article-title":"The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration","volume":"62","author":"Liberati","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.12.033","article-title":"First versus second stage C\/S maternal and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"175","author":"Pergialiotis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.02.025","article-title":"Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: an updated meta-analysis","volume":"247","author":"Pergialiotis","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0055","first-page":"459","article-title":"Caput succedaneum thickness in prolonged second stage of labour: a clinical evaluation","volume":"53","author":"Gilboa","year":"2013","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0060","series-title":"The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses","author":"Wells","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0065","series-title":"Systematic reviews in health care","first-page":"157","article-title":"Why and how sources of heterogeneity should be investigated","author":"Egger","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e15987","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000015987","article-title":"The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses","volume":"98","author":"Shi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-25","article-title":"The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method","volume":"14","author":"IntHout","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e010247","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-010247","article-title":"Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis","volume":"6","author":"IntHout","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"906","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90364-X","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration","volume":"173","author":"Menticoglou","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.044","article-title":"How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?","volume":"191","author":"Cheng","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.002","article-title":"When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia","volume":"201","author":"Le Ray","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802676709","article-title":"Prolonged second stage of labor and postpartum hemorrhage","volume":"22","author":"Lu","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/S1995-7645(11)60114-4","article-title":"Effect of prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"4","author":"Li","year":"2011","journal-title":"Asian Pac J Trop Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.04.035","article-title":"Duration of passive and active phases of the second stage of labour and risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"158","author":"Le Ray","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"536","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0115","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"210","author":"Harper","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30227-9","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in 1515 cases of prolonged second stage of labour in nulliparous women","volume":"37","author":"Hunt","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.5539\/gjhs.v7n1p267","article-title":"Prolonged second stage of labor and levator ani muscle injuries","volume":"7","author":"Marsoosi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Glob J Health Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"886","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1191066","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes of vacuum assisted versus cesarean deliveries for prolonged second stage of delivery at term","volume":"30","author":"Shmueli","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13287","article-title":"Prolonged second stage of labour, maternal infectious disease, urinary retention and other complications in the early postpartum period","volume":"123","author":"Stephansson","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12344","article-title":"Duration of second stage of labour at term and pushing time: risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage","volume":"31","author":"Looft","year":"2017","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.214","article-title":"Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study","volume":"37","author":"Sandstrom","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0150","first-page":"27","article-title":"Is prolonged labor managed adequately in rural rwandan hospitals?","volume":"23","author":"Kalisa","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1111\/tmi.13222","article-title":"Women\u2019s recommendations: vacuum extraction or caesarean section for prolonged second stage of labour, a prospective cohort study in Uganda","volume":"24","author":"Nolens","year":"2019","journal-title":"Trop Med Int Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0160","series-title":"Epidural use in labour is not associated with an increased risk of maternal or neonatal morbidity when the second stage is prolonged","author":"Turner","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00129.x","article-title":"Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review","volume":"33","author":"Altman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12137","article-title":"Influence of the duration of the second stage of labor on the likelihood of obstetric anal sphincter injury","volume":"42","author":"Aiken","year":"2015","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.06.004","article-title":"Short vs long second stage of labour: is there a difference in terms of postpartum anal incontinence?","volume":"152","author":"Badiou","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2018.1534811","article-title":"Reassessing the length of labour in healthy Turkish women: a retrospective and descriptive study","volume":"39","author":"Boz","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02928.x","article-title":"Effects of prolonged second stage, method of birth, timing of caesarean section and other obstetric risk factors on postnatal urinary incontinence: an Australian nulliparous cohort study","volume":"118","author":"Brown","year":"2011","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050701227927","article-title":"Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome","volume":"20","author":"Chang","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0195","article-title":"Obesity, second stage duration, and labor outcomes in nulliparous women","author":"Frolova","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2015.11.012","article-title":"Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: To prolong or to vacuum?","volume":"34","author":"Garmi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.12704","article-title":"Prevalence of prolonged latent phase and labor outcomes: review of birth records in a swedish population","volume":"63","author":"Angeby","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"361","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0210","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines","volume":"214","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0215","first-page":"685","article-title":"[PROLONGED SECOND STAGE OF LABOR: CAUSES AND OUTCOMES]","volume":"157","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Harefuah"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003587","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity after 4 and 6 hours of protracted active labor in nulliparous term pregnancies","volume":"135","author":"Govindappagari","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0225","first-page":"229","article-title":"Perinatal outcome after a prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"35","author":"Moon","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12935","article-title":"Prolonged second stage of labour increases maternal morbidity but not neonatal morbidity","volume":"59","author":"Matta","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0235","first-page":"1","article-title":"Pushing the limits: perinatal outcomes beyond prolonged second stage","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"191","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0240","first-page":"e1","article-title":"The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"220","author":"Zipori","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000278","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"124","author":"Laughon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1314894","article-title":"An analysis of second-stage labor beyond 3 hours in nulliparous women","volume":"29","author":"Bleich","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"357","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0255","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes","volume":"201","author":"Rouse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor","volume":"113","author":"Allen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"306","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0265","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"197","author":"Sung","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1080\/0144361031000098361","article-title":"Factors associated with a prolonged second state of labour--a case-controlled study of 364 nulliparous labours","volume":"23","author":"O\u2019Connell","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0275","first-page":"52","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"102","author":"Myles","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.810305.x","article-title":"The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome","volume":"81","author":"Janni","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0285","first-page":"145","article-title":"[Maternal and neonatal prognosis after a prolonged second stage of labor]","volume":"28","author":"Gerber","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1996.tb00975.x","article-title":"Factors influencing the prolonged second stage and the effects on perinatal and maternal outcomes","volume":"22","author":"Kuo","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"361","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0295","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines","volume":"214","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1174999","article-title":"Prolonged second stage in nulliparous with epidurals: a systematic review","volume":"30","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121152030381X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121152030381X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:48:21Z","timestamp":1759556901000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S030121152030381X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"references-count":60,"alternative-id":["S030121152030381X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes following a prolonged second stage of labor: A meta-analysis of observational studies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}