{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T18:16:39Z","timestamp":1792260999900,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,24]],"date-time":"2020-08-24T21:21:39Z","timestamp":1598304099000},"page":"213-219","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"253","author":[{"given":"Maria Jo\u00e3o","family":"Fonseca","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fernanda","family":"Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vera","family":"Afreixo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Isabel Santos","family":"Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria do C\u00e9u","family":"Almeida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000140682.63746.be","article-title":"Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"104","author":"Jacobsson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-1984-x","article-title":"The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies","volume":"18","author":"Kahveci","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0015","first-page":"117","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes of mothers with very advanced maternal age (40 years or more)","volume":"98","author":"Traisrisilp","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1410","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000163256.83313.36","article-title":"The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing","volume":"105","author":"Joseph","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.20344\/amp.11057","article-title":"Advanced maternal age: adverse outcomes of pregnancy, a meta-analysis","volume":"32","author":"Pinheiro","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Med Port"},{"issue":"08","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1546109","article-title":"Pregnancy and obstetrical outcomes in women over 40 years of age","volume":"75","author":"Dietl","year":"2015","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.11.004","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management at term by subgroups of maternal age: an individual patient data meta-analysis","volume":"197","author":"Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.019","article-title":"Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the United States","volume":"195","author":"Reddy","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.05.045","article-title":"The risk of stillbirth and infant death by each additional week of expectant management stratified by maternal age","volume":"209","author":"Page","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1-2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0055","first-page":"25","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor","volume":"56","author":"Vardo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34372-9","article-title":"Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"31","author":"Dunne","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.2471\/BLT.08.061226","article-title":"Elective induction versus spontaneous labour in Latin America","volume":"89","author":"Guerra","year":"2011","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1509117","article-title":"Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older","volume":"374","author":"Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.06.018","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction at term: Induction or spontaneous labour?: Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): A Pilot Study","volume":"125","author":"Van den Hove","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"9694","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks\u2019 gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0095","first-page":"S2","article-title":"Induction of labor or expectant management for large-for-dates fetuses: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"206","author":"Boulvain","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002425","article-title":"Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: an English national cohort study","volume":"14","author":"Knight","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"01","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"045","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1648228","article-title":"Nonmedically indicated induction of labor compared with expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or older","volume":"36","author":"Kawakita","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"9774","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)62233-7","article-title":"Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"377","author":"Flenady","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9600","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1715","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61723-1","article-title":"Stillbirth","volume":"370","author":"Smith","year":"2007","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e850","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2011.09.011","article-title":"Womens\u2019 attitudes and beliefs of childbirth and association with birth preference: a comparison of a Swedish and an Australian sample in mid-pregnancy","volume":"28","author":"Haines","year":"2012","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1742-4755-3-1","article-title":"The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review","volume":"3","author":"Say","year":"2006","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.02.016","article-title":"Induction of labour at term for women over 35 years old: a survey of the views of women and obstetricians","volume":"162","author":"Walker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-3016.2001.00337.x","article-title":"Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies","volume":"15","author":"Boulvain","year":"2001","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2011.645091","article-title":"Elective induction of labour increases caesarean section rate in low risk multiparous women","volume":"32","author":"Jacquemyn","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01298.x","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes following induction of labor: a cohort study","volume":"91","author":"Grivell","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"958","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13561","article-title":"Induction of labor at full\u2010term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a systematic review and meta\u2010analysis of randomized trials","volume":"98","author":"Saccone","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-013-0486-z","article-title":"The risk factors for failure of labor induction: a cohort study","volume":"64","author":"Giugliano","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2006.00443.x","article-title":"Comparative study of induction of labor in nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes at term compared to those with intact membranes: duration of labor and mode of delivery","volume":"32","author":"Park","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","article-title":"Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"220","author":"Hersh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520305364?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520305364?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,1]],"date-time":"2024-07-01T18:42:44Z","timestamp":1719859364000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211520305364"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"references-count":33,"alternative-id":["S0301211520305364"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}