{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T03:12:40Z","timestamp":1792293160569,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,1]],"date-time":"2020-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1604188800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,1]],"date-time":"2020-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1604188800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100011228","name":"Canterbury Christ Church University","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100011228","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,26]],"date-time":"2020-08-26T21:56:38Z","timestamp":1598478998000},"page":"175-180","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Kielland\u2019s rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"254","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8434-6815","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tara","family":"Giacchino","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rebecca","family":"Karkia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Weiyu","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jaroslaw","family":"Beta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hasib","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7265-5442","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ranjit","family":"Akolekar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000106","article-title":"Fetal malposition: impact and management","volume":"58","author":"Caughey","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0010","series-title":"Abnormal labour","article-title":"Williams obstetrics","author":"Cunningham","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003","article-title":"Fetal malpresentation and malposition: diagnosis and management","volume":"44","author":"Pilliod","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120085500","article-title":"A matched controlled study of Kielland\u2019s forceps for transverse arrest of the fetal vertex","volume":"21","author":"Schiff","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12199","article-title":"A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour","volume":"120","author":"Tempest","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0030","article-title":"Kjelland\u2019s forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery: original article","volume":"49","author":"Al-Suhel","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1526","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12398","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study","volume":"120","author":"Bahl","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828b72cb","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland\u2019s rotational forceps delivery","volume":"121","author":"Stock","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182695581","article-title":"Use and safety of Kielland\u2019s forceps in current obstetric practice","volume":"120","author":"Burke","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-197908000-00010","article-title":"Kiellands forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality","volume":"34","author":"Chiswick","year":"1979","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031","article-title":"Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"212","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12511","article-title":"Kielland\u2019s forceps. from controversy to consensus?","volume":"94","author":"Nash","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12592","article-title":"Forceps: towards obsolescence or revival?","volume":"94","author":"Dietz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0070","first-page":"e106","article-title":"on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage","volume":"124","author":"Mavrides","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1177\/135626229900500601","article-title":"Obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence","volume":"5","author":"Sultan","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin Risk"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2014.3269","article-title":"Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a review for the clinician","volume":"169","author":"Douglas-Escobar","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0085","series-title":"Shoulder dystocia. Green top guideline no. 42","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2014.04.007","article-title":"Neonatal brachial plexus palsy: incidence, prevalence, and temporal trends","volume":"38","author":"Chauhan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000221","article-title":"Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland\u2019s forceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes","volume":"27","author":"Al Wattar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520305376?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520305376?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:49:49Z","timestamp":1759556989000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211520305376"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"references-count":19,"alternative-id":["S0301211520305376"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Kielland\u2019s rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}