{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,5]],"date-time":"2025-10-05T00:30:00Z","timestamp":1759624200918,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Israel Ministry of Science and Technology"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,5]],"date-time":"2020-11-05T07:46:40Z","timestamp":1604562400000},"page":"109-113","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Successful vaginal birth after cesarean in the second delivery is not associated with the stage of labor of the primary unplanned cesarean delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"256","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2991-1572","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aya A.","family":"Lewkowicz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michal","family":"Lipschuetz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sarah M.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joshua","family":"Guedalia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tomer","family":"Shwartz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1282-5379","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gabriel","family":"Levin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Amihai","family":"Rottenstreich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1412-5862","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Simcha","family":"Yagel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.012","article-title":"Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem","volume":"36","author":"Boyle","year":"2012","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate","volume":"118","author":"Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"American College of O","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3 Pt 2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","article-title":"The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"193","author":"Landon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","article-title":"Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study","volume":"193","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"25","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115044","article-title":"Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity","volume":"184","author":"Hibbard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000101","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: an effective method to reduce cesarean","volume":"58","author":"Sabol","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f2de49","article-title":"New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted?","volume":"116","author":"Eden","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0050","article-title":"Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.045","article-title":"A large head circumference is more strongly associated with unplanned cesarean or instrumental delivery and neonatal complications than high birthweight","volume":"213","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230","article-title":"Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"218","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12023","article-title":"Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia -- effect on subsequent trial of labor","volume":"92","author":"Abildgaard","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050902874089","article-title":"Cervical dilatation at the time of cesarean section may affect the success of a subsequent vaginal delivery","volume":"22","author":"Kwon","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.064","article-title":"Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success","volume":"213","author":"Lewkowitz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1524","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13447","article-title":"Risk of repeat cesarean delivery in women undergoing trial of labor: a population-based cohort study","volume":"97","author":"Lindblad Wollmann","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2334-3","article-title":"Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"19","author":"Place","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.1038\/s41372-019-0373-2","article-title":"Hospital contribution to variation in rates of vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"39","author":"Triebwasser","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2012.01388.x","article-title":"Trial of labor and vaginal delivery rates in women with a prior cesarean","volume":"41","author":"Eden","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012","article-title":"Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System","volume":"219","author":"Hehir","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.058","article-title":"Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States","volume":"203","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.12.267","article-title":"Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning","volume":"222","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003527","article-title":"Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after failed vacuum-assisted delivery","volume":"134","author":"Levin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0120","unstructured":"OECD. Fertility rates (indicator). https:\/\/data.oecd.org\/pop\/fertility-rates.htm. Published 2020. Accessed 26 April, 2020."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11191","article-title":"Cardiovascular system in preeclampsia and beyond","volume":"73","author":"Thilaganathan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"year":"2017","series-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean","author":"Israeli Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045_bib0130"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520306837?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520306837?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:49:59Z","timestamp":1759556999000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211520306837"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["S0301211520306837"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Successful vaginal birth after cesarean in the second delivery is not associated with the stage of labor of the primary unplanned cesarean delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.045","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}