{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T22:59:33Z","timestamp":1788476373519,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,18]],"date-time":"2020-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1608249600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,11]],"date-time":"2020-11-11T15:44:48Z","timestamp":1605109488000},"page":"263-269","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Electronic Continuous Pain Measurement vs Verbal Rating Scale in gynaecology: A prospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"256","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8509-3386","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marjoleine D.","family":"Louwerse","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wouter J.K.","family":"Hehenkamp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul J.M.","family":"van Kesteren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Birgit I.","family":"Lissenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hans A.M.","family":"Br\u00f6lmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Judith A.F.","family":"Huirne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.3109\/13645706.2013.823451","article-title":"The past, present and future of minimally invasive endoscopy in gynaecology: a review and speculative outlook","volume":"22","author":"Mettler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0010","first-page":"274","article-title":"The historical impact of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"101","author":"Hartel","year":"2000","journal-title":"Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2014.00393","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of office hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"18","author":"Moawad","year":"2014","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0020","first-page":"126","article-title":"Modern operative hysteroscopy","volume":"68","author":"Centini","year":"2016","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60042-4","article-title":"Pain relief and outpatient hysteroscopy: a literature review","volume":"11","author":"Readman","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laprosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.08.009","article-title":"Office operative hysteroscopy: an update","volume":"25","author":"Salazar","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.10.002","article-title":"Effectiveness of outpatient versus operating room hysteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of uterine conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"41","author":"Bennett","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gmit.2016.08.001","article-title":"Pain management in outpatient hysteroscopy","volume":"5","author":"Del Valle","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0045","series-title":"Best practice in outpatient hysteroscopy. RCOG Green-top guideline No. 59","author":"Royal College of Obstetricans and Gynaecologists","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.01096.x","article-title":"Outpatient hysteroscopy: factors influencing post-procedure acceptability in patients attending a tertiary referral center","volume":"49","author":"McIlwaine","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh559","article-title":"Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy","volume":"20","author":"Campo","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000272","article-title":"Pain management for gynecologic procedures in the office","volume":"71","author":"Ireland","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcma.2014.07.004","article-title":"Impact of preprocedural anxiety levels on pain perception in patients undergoing office hysteroscopy","volume":"77","author":"Kokanali","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Chin Med Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.03.008","article-title":"Predictive factors for pain experienced at office fluid minihysteroscopy","volume":"14","author":"Cicinelli","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-003-9144-3","article-title":"Patient anxiety and experiences associated with an outpatient \u2018one-stop\u2019 \u2018see and treat\u2019 hysteroscopy clinic","volume":"18","author":"Gupta","year":"2004","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.12.118","article-title":"Identifying predictors of unacceptable pain at office hysteroscopy","volume":"21","author":"de Freitas Fonseca","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12560","article-title":"Is outpatient hysteroscopy the new gold standard? Results from an 11-year prospective observational study","volume":"57","author":"Ma","year":"2017","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(74)90884-8","article-title":"Measurement of pain","volume":"304","author":"Huskisson","year":"1975","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1533-2500.2009.00260.x","article-title":"Reliability of a continuous pain score meter: real time pain measurement","volume":"9","author":"Boormans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pain Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2004.11.003","article-title":"Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables: is reactivity a problem?","volume":"6","author":"Aaron","year":"2005","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2004.04.012","article-title":"Electronic pain questionnaires: a randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment","volume":"110","author":"Cook","year":"2004","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3959(02)00178-1","article-title":"Comparative study of electronic vs. Paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers","volume":"99","author":"Jamison","year":"2002","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ajp.0000173371.54579.31","article-title":"e-Ouch: usability testing of an electronic chronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis","volume":"22","author":"Stinson","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","article-title":"The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data","volume":"33","author":"Landis","year":"1977","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14567","article-title":"Misoprostol for cervical priming prior to hysteroscopy in postmenopausal and premenopausal nulliparous women; a multicentre randomised placebo controlled trial","volume":"125","author":"Tasma","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1080\/13697137.2020.1754388","article-title":"Pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief for office hysteroscopy: an up-to-date review","volume":"23","author":"Riemma","year":"2020","journal-title":"Climacteric"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1080\/13645706.2019.1576054","article-title":"Non-pharmacological pain control in outpatient hysteroscopies","volume":"29","author":"Amer-Cuenca","year":"2020","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.08.015","article-title":"Pain relief in outpatient hysteroscopy: a survey of current UK clinical practice","volume":"154","author":"O\u2019Flynn","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520307235?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211520307235?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:51:53Z","timestamp":1759557113000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211520307235"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"references-count":28,"alternative-id":["S0301211520307235"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Electronic Continuous Pain Measurement vs Verbal Rating Scale in gynaecology: A prospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}