{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T05:11:51Z","timestamp":1777093911308,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,13]],"date-time":"2020-11-13T11:24:40Z","timestamp":1605266680000},"page":"211-214","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"special_numbering":"C","title":["External cephalic version: Predictors of success and influence on caesarean rates"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"256","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3676-5991","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Susana","family":"Correia Costa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maria In\u00eas","family":"Raposo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ana Paula","family":"Machado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carla","family":"Ramalho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Diogo","family":"Ayres-de-Campos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nuno","family":"Montenegro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0005","article-title":"External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation: green-top guideline No. 20a","volume":"124","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0010","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation at term","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"9239","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12449","article-title":"Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study","volume":"93","author":"Vlemmix","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0025","series-title":"Management of breech presentation at term","author":"The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists","year":"2016"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.x","article-title":"The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants","volume":"112","author":"Rietberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.039","article-title":"Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"194","author":"Glezerman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e54","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001312","article-title":"Gynecologists\u2019 committee on practice B-O. Practice bulletin No. 161: external cephalic version","volume":"127","author":"American College of O","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182854b36","article-title":"Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice kennedy shriver national institute of child health and human development, society for maternal-fetal medicine, and american college of obstetricians and gynecologists workshop. In reply","volume":"121","author":"Spong","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0055","article-title":"External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years\u2019 experience","author":"Melo","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000295","article-title":"Mode of delivery after successful external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"123","author":"de Hundt","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003196","article-title":"Prediction of success in external cephalic version for breech presentation at term","volume":"133","author":"Isakov","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2019-0143","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique","volume":"47","author":"Trobo","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6277","article-title":"Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis","volume":"33","author":"Kok","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12023.x","article-title":"Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study","volume":"104","author":"Lau","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04825.x","article-title":"A randomized trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy","volume":"91","author":"Brocks","year":"1984","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1639","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70118-7","article-title":"Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version","volume":"175","author":"Mauldin","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121152030748X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121152030748X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:51:21Z","timestamp":1759557081000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S030121152030748X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"references-count":18,"alternative-id":["S030121152030748X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"External cephalic version: Predictors of success and influence on caesarean rates","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.037","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}