{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T18:02:41Z","timestamp":1784829761801,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]],"date-time":"2021-06-03T21:16:47Z","timestamp":1622755007000},"page":"33-43","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Comparison of visual and computerised antenatal cardiotocography in the prevention of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"263","author":[{"given":"H.","family":"Baker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Pilarski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V.A.","family":"Hodgetts-Morton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.K.","family":"Morris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","article-title":"FIGO Consensus Guidelines on Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring","volume":"131","author":"International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (FIGO)","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0010","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies London: NICE; 2014 [updated 2017] [Available from: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/cg190]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM, Cuthbert A. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD006066.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006066.pub3"},{"issue":"4935","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.2.4935.358","article-title":"Foetal distress and intrapartum foetal death","volume":"2","author":"Fitzgerald","year":"1955","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1084","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(59)90052-3","article-title":"Observations on pathologic fetal bradycardia","volume":"77","author":"Hon","year":"1959","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogrm.2016.11.004","article-title":"Antenatal fetal wellbeing","volume":"27","author":"Haran","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet, Gynaecol Reprod Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(80)90141-6","article-title":"Nonstressed antepartum heart rate monitoring: implications of decelerations after spontaneous contractions","volume":"138","author":"Visser","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14408.x","article-title":"Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers","volume":"99","author":"Dawes","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0045","first-page":"2","article-title":"Avoiding CTG misinterpretation: a review of the latest Dawes-Redman CTG analysis","volume":"22","author":"Redman","year":"2014","journal-title":"British J Midwifery"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01774.x","article-title":"The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses","volume":"115","author":"Serra","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GML, Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2015(9):CD007863.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007863.pub4"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GML, Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev 2012;12:CD007863.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007863.pub3"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70118-3","article-title":"Comparison of visual and computerized interpretation of nonstress test results in a randomized controlled trial","volume":"181","author":"Bracero","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0070","first-page":"166","article-title":"Routine or computerized cardiotocography in severe preeclampsia? a randomized controlled trial","volume":"7","author":"Steyn","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Investig"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0075","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies London.2008 [updated 2019 Feb] [Available from: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/cg62]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0080","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reduced Fetal Movements. Green-top Guideline No. 57. London; 2011."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction","volume":"56","author":"Lees","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0090","unstructured":"NHS England. Saving Babies Lives' Care Bundle Version 2. 2019 [Available from: https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/saving-babies-lives-care-bundle-version-two-v5.pdf]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0095","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Investigation and Management for the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. Green-top Guideline No. 31. 2nd Edition. ed. London.2013."},{"issue":"9983","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3","article-title":"2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial","volume":"385","author":"Lees","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0110","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000061","article-title":"Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Campbell","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Evid Based Healthc"},{"issue":"7414","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0130","unstructured":"Review Manager (RevMan). 5.4 ed: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2020."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0135","article-title":"Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline","volume":"368","author":"Campbell","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0140","article-title":"Antenatal cardiotocography with and without computer analysis in high-risk pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"3","author":"Saccone","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstetrics Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0145","first-page":"28","article-title":"Computer analysis of fetal heart rate by the Sonicaid Oxford 8002 System during pregnancy and labor. Personal experience and report of the literature","volume":"30","author":"Boog","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1517","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)90792-3","article-title":"A comparison of visual and automated methods of analyzing fetal heart rate tests","volume":"168","author":"Hiett","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0155","first-page":"1228","article-title":"Comparison between visual and computerized cardiotocography in low risk pregnancy","volume":"26","author":"Mirghani","year":"2005","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.2528","article-title":"Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events","volume":"26","author":"Bradburn","year":"2007","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0165","first-page":"269","article-title":"Cardiotocographic monitoring of fetal health. Comparative evaluation of traditional and computerized methods [Italian]","volume":"43","author":"Scibilia","year":"1991","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e7976","article-title":"Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies)","volume":"345","author":"Costeloe","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0175","unstructured":"Grimes DA. Discovering the need for randomized controlled trials in obstetrics: a personal odyssey. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation. 2007 [Available from: https:\/\/www.jameslindlibrary.org\/articles\/discovering-the-need-for-randomized-controlled-trials-in-obstetrics-a-personal-odyssey\/]."},{"issue":"Suppl 7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13208","article-title":"Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers","volume":"121","author":"Dawes","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)02846-4","article-title":"Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms","volume":"57","author":"Bernardes","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstetr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Woodring TC, Sanderson M, Magann EF, Morrison JC. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):623.e1-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.027"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107665","article-title":"A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system","volume":"183","author":"Devoe","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0200","unstructured":"TRUFFLE Collaborators. TRUFFLE2 2021 [Available from: https:\/\/truffle-study.org\/research\/]."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90008-4","article-title":"A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results","volume":"143","author":"Freeman","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211521002712?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211521002712?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:53:11Z","timestamp":1759557191000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211521002712"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"references-count":41,"alternative-id":["S0301211521002712"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparison of visual and computerised antenatal cardiotocography in the prevention of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}