{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,10]],"date-time":"2026-11-10T00:39:44Z","timestamp":1794271184051,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]],"date-time":"2021-10-22T18:00:04Z","timestamp":1634925604000},"page":"90-98","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"267","author":[{"given":"Ali","family":"Azadi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4724-9148","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Greg","family":"Marchand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmed Taher","family":"Masoud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katelyn","family":"Sainz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Malini","family":"Govindan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kelly","family":"Ware","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexa","family":"King","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stacy","family":"Ruther","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanna","family":"Brazil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicolas","family":"Calteux","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hollie","family":"Ulibarri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julia","family":"Parise","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amanda","family":"Arroyo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine","family":"Coriell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sydnee","family":"Goetz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Donald R.","family":"Ostergard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22922","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)","volume":"35","author":"Haylen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Avc\u0131bay Vurge\u00e7 B, K\u0131z\u0131lkaya Beji N. \u0130leri Evre Pelvik Organ Proplapsusu Olan Kad\u0131nlarda Ya\u015fam Kalitesi Ve Cinsel Ya\u015fam. Cukurova Med J 2018;43(Ek 1):230\u20139.","DOI":"10.17826\/cumj.427253"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","article-title":"Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"24","author":"Barber","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0581","article-title":"Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"46","author":"Weintraub","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0902-1","article-title":"The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population","volume":"20","author":"Slieker-ten Hove","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1215-0","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors","volume":"22","author":"Walker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0195910","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0195910","article-title":"Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: a population based study in Tanzanian rural community","volume":"13","author":"Masenga","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1873","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04196-1","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse in Northwest Ethiopia: a population-based study","volume":"31","author":"Belayneh","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1111\/tog.12220","article-title":"Management of uterine prolapse: is hysterectomy necessary?","volume":"18","author":"Jefferis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0050","first-page":"1111","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"81","author":"Kuncharapu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","article-title":"Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence","volume":"89","author":"Olsen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1623","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0718-4","article-title":"Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy","volume":"19","author":"D\u00e4llenbach","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","article-title":"Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"209","author":"Korbly","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376","article-title":"Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse (Review) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON","author":"Maher","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group TP. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses\u00a0: The PRISMA Statement. 2009;6(7).","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series. Vol. Version 5., Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series. 2008.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470712184"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0085","unstructured":"Green S, Higgins P. Julian T, Alderson P, Clarke M, Mulrow D C, Oxman D A. Cochrane Handbook: Cochrane Reviews: Ch 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Cochrane Handbook for: Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2011. p. 3\u201310."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","article-title":"Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range","volume":"14","author":"Wan","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"7109","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1590\/S0100-69912009000100012","article-title":"A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: hysteropexy versus hysterectomy","volume":"36","author":"Carram\u00e3o","year":"2009","journal-title":"Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03948-3","article-title":"Vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral sacrospinous fixation plus an anterior mesh versus abdominal sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of primary apical prolapse in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled study","volume":"31","author":"de Castro","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1687","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2761-2","article-title":"Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study","volume":"26","author":"Rahmanou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20104","article-title":"A randomized comparison of post-operative pain, quality of life, and physical performance during the first 6 weeks after abdominal or vaginal surgical correction of descensus uteri","volume":"24","author":"Roovers","year":"2005","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00001.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function","volume":"111","author":"Roovers","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e315","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000917","article-title":"Laparoscopic cerclage sacrohysteropexy: comparing a novel technique for sacrohysteropexy to traditional supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocervicopexy","volume":"27","author":"Armstrong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstructive Surgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schulten SF, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ 2019;366.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5149"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0135","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"351","author":"Detollenaere","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7","article-title":"One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study","volume":"21","author":"Dietz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E. \u00dcnl\u00fcbilgin, A.A. Sivaslio\u011flu, T.T. Ilhan, Y. Kumtepe ID. Which one is the appropriate approach for uterine prolapse: Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy? Turkiye Klin J Med Sci. 2013;33:321\u20135.","DOI":"10.5336\/medsci.2011-28041"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta24130","article-title":"Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs","volume":"24","author":"Hemming","year":"2020","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess (Rockv)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0155","first-page":"S903","article-title":"Hysterectomy vs no hysterectomy for uterine prolapse in conjunction with posterior infracoccygeal colpopexy-a randomised pilot study 12 months review","volume":"22","author":"Juneja","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04328-y","article-title":"Hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension or UpholdTM hysteropexy in women with apical prolapse: a parallel cohort study","volume":"31","author":"Kulkarni","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0165","first-page":"855","article-title":"A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of stage two, or higher uterine prolapse: hysterectomy with mesh vs only mesh implantation","volume":"31","author":"Malandri","year":"2012","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2019.12812","article-title":"Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: as randomized clinical trial","volume":"322","author":"Nager","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3291-x","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes","author":"Kapoor","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1617","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1","article-title":"Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"de Oliveira","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","article-title":"Systematic Reviews Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines","volume":"219","author":"Kim-fine","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03876-2","article-title":"Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines","volume":"30","author":"Meriwether","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2685-8","article-title":"Risk factors of surgical failure following sacrospinous colpopexy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"287","author":"Qatawneh","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0200","first-page":"900","article-title":"Significance of preoperative calculation of uterine weight as an indicator for preserving the uterus in pelvic reconstructive surgery","volume":"8","author":"Sheng","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Path"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2564-x","article-title":"A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"26","author":"Jirschele","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","article-title":"Uterine-preserving POP surgery","volume":"24","author":"Gutman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2209-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 1-to 4-year follow-up of women postoperatively","volume":"25","author":"Rahmanou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1101-9","article-title":"Uterus conserving prolapse surgery\u2014what is the chance of missing a malignancy?","volume":"21","author":"Renganathan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211521005091?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211521005091?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:54:30Z","timestamp":1759557270000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211521005091"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"references-count":44,"alternative-id":["S0301211521005091"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}