{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T07:21:09Z","timestamp":1763018469001,"version":"3.30.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,24]],"date-time":"2021-11-24T16:05:22Z","timestamp":1637769922000},"page":"62-67","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"special_numbering":"C","title":["The Charit\u00e9 external cephalic version for leading twin breech without regional anesthesia and tocolysis. A prospective study on feasibility, sonographic assessment and outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"268","author":[{"given":"Larry","family":"Hinkson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Madeleine","family":"Schauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elisabetta","family":"Latartara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maria","family":"Alonso-Espias","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emma","family":"Rossetti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pimrapat","family":"Gebert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Susan","family":"Hinkson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Henrich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.031","article-title":"Trends in the delivery route of twin pregnancies in the United States, 2006\u20132013","volume":"205","author":"Bateni","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182318651","article-title":"Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995\u20132008","volume":"118","author":"Lee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.07.056","article-title":"Risk factors for cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery","volume":"212","author":"Fox","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13785","article-title":"Updated guidance for the management of twin and triplet pregnancies from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance, UK: What's new that may improve perinatal outcomes?","volume":"99","author":"Gibson","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College)","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00631.x","article-title":"Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births","volume":"112","author":"Smith","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.132","article-title":"Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight","volume":"192","author":"Yang","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMc1314560","article-title":"Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"370","author":"Smith","year":"2014","journal-title":"New Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000578","article-title":"Association of prelabor cesarean delivery with reduced mortality in twins born near term","volume":"125","author":"Roberts","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003785","article-title":"First Twin in breech presentation and neonatal mortality and morbidity according to planned mode of delivery","volume":"135","author":"Korb","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstetr Gynecol"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1214939","article-title":"A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"369","author":"Barrett","year":"2013","journal-title":"New Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e54","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001312","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 161: External Cephalic Version","volume":"127","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstetrics and gynecology"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"External Cephalic Version and Reducing the Incidence of Term Breech Presentation: Green-top Guideline No. 20a. BJOG 2017;124:e178-e92.","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0065","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14466"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00028-8","article-title":"External cephalic version of twin A","volume":"89","author":"Bloomfield","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0075","first-page":"1","article-title":"External cephalic version of the non-cephalic presenting twin: a systematic review","author":"Felder","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Maternal-fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.06.033","article-title":"External cephalic version of a breech Twin A is possible","volume":"215","author":"Hinkson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1606197","article-title":"An alternative to cesarean: a description of external cephalic version in noncephalic presenting twin","volume":"34","author":"Staat","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Maternal-fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0090","first-page":"CD000184","article-title":"Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version","author":"Cluver","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0095","first-page":"345","article-title":"The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial","volume":"93","author":"Dugoff","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2009.02.006","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation","volume":"18","author":"Sullivan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0105","first-page":"648","article-title":"Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial","volume":"95","author":"Mancuso","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00127.x","article-title":"External cephalic version induced fetal cerebral and umbilical blood flow changes are related to the amount of pressure exerted","volume":"111","author":"Leung","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.12.053","article-title":"Usefulness of atosiban for tocolysis during external cephalic version: Systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"258","author":"Riemma","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i6773","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i6773","article-title":"Atosiban versus fenoterol as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: randomised controlled trial","volume":"356","author":"Velzel","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02824.x","article-title":"Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review","volume":"118","author":"Wilcox","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3923","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1478958","article-title":"The effect of supine positioning on maternal hemodynamics during late pregnancy","volume":"32","author":"Humphries","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Maternal-fetal Neonatal Med."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1217","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000004166","article-title":"Effect of right-lateral versus left-lateral tilt position on compression of the inferior vena cava in pregnant women determined by magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"128","author":"Fujita","year":"2019","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000194207.06554.5b","article-title":"Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology","volume":"107","author":"Van Voorhis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0145","first-page":"CD006553","article-title":"Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2011.07.001","article-title":"Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: a systematic review","volume":"20","author":"Sultan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000295605.38175.7b","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation with or without spinal analgesia in nulliparous women at term: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"110","author":"Weiniger","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13238.x","article-title":"External cephalic version with epidural anaesthesia after failure of a first trial with beta-mimetics","volume":"107","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2003.00269.x","article-title":"Quantification of contact surface pressure exerted during external cephalic version","volume":"82","author":"Leung","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2006.046","article-title":"Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage following failed external cephalic version: case report","volume":"34","author":"Khoo","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00690.x","article-title":"Feto-maternal haemorrhage following successful and unsuccessful attempts at external cephalic version","volume":"82","author":"Marcus","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.11.025","article-title":"The effect of transient fetal bradycardia and other heart rate changes during and after external cephalic version on perinatal outcomes","volume":"245","author":"Hruban","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211521009714?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211521009714?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,9]],"date-time":"2024-12-09T16:11:00Z","timestamp":1733760660000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211521009714"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"references-count":36,"alternative-id":["S0301211521009714"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The Charit\u00e9 external cephalic version for leading twin breech without regional anesthesia and tocolysis. A prospective study on feasibility, sonographic assessment and outcomes","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.11.426","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}