{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T13:56:29Z","timestamp":1762005389686,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,1]],"date-time":"2022-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1643673600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,1]],"date-time":"2022-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1643673600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,27]],"date-time":"2021-12-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640563200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004359","name":"Swedish Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2016-00526"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2016-00526"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004359","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,21]],"date-time":"2021-12-21T11:22:25Z","timestamp":1640085745000},"page":"62-70","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Attitudes and knowledge regarding episiotomy use and technique in vacuum extraction: A web-based survey among doctors in Sweden"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"269","author":[{"given":"Victoria","family":"Ankarcrona","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Susanne","family":"Hesselman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Helena","family":"Kopp Kallner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sophia","family":"Brismar Wendel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0005","unstructured":"Socialstyrelsen State of the Art - Normal birth Available from: https:\/\/www.sfog.se\/media\/66770\/state_of_the_art_pn.pdf 2001 National Board of Health and Welfare Stockholm, Sweden"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13552","article-title":"FIGO good clinical practice paper: management of the second stage of labor","volume":"152","author":"Wright","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2019-0433","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery: a review of four national guidelines","volume":"48","author":"Tsakiridis","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.13096","article-title":"Mediolateral Episiotomy: Technique, Practice, and Training","volume":"65","author":"Hersh","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2:CD000081.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000081.pub3"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.10.013","article-title":"Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"207","author":"Lund","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3422-4","article-title":"The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry","volume":"29","author":"van Bavel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12894","article-title":"Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project","volume":"95","author":"Blondel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"724","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03293.x","article-title":"Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study","volume":"119","author":"Stedenfeldt","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.12.019","article-title":"Which characteristics of the episiotomy and perineum are associated with a lower risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in instrumental deliveries","volume":"233","author":"Gonzalez-D\u00edaz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0730-7659.2006.00088.x","article-title":"Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study","volume":"33","author":"Andrews","year":"2006","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.005","article-title":"The role of mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery","volume":"240","author":"Sultan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.09.015","article-title":"Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees","volume":"112","author":"Kalis","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12856","article-title":"Episiotomy preferences, indication, and classification\u2013a survey among Nordic doctors","volume":"95","author":"Fodstad","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03268.x","article-title":"Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology","volume":"119","author":"Kalis","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.03030.x","article-title":"Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors","volume":"110","author":"Tincello","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.12.002","article-title":"Mediolateral episiotomy: are trained midwives and doctors approaching it from a different angle?","volume":"174","author":"Wong","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2680-2","article-title":"The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature","volume":"26","author":"Sagi-Dain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e025050","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-025050","article-title":"Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial","volume":"9","author":"Bergendahl","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000420","article-title":"Awareness Regarding Perineal Protection, Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury, and Episiotomy Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents; Effects of an Educational Workshop","volume":"24","author":"Stecher","year":"2018","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.04.006","article-title":"Episiotomy: What angle do you cut to the midline?","volume":"213","author":"Ma","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2016.09.006","article-title":"Episiotomy Technique and Management of Anal Sphincter Tears-A Survey of Clinical Practice and Education","volume":"38","author":"Menzies","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1065233","article-title":"Indications for episiotomy performance - a cross-sectional survey and review of the literature","volume":"36","author":"Sagi-Dain","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"19","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3308","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1571573","article-title":"The impact of active delivery of the anterior arm during vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery on perineal tears: a clinical practice evaluation","volume":"33","author":"Hulot","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e001649","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2012-001649","article-title":"Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study","volume":"2","author":"Laine","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ Open."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ankarcrona V, Zhao H, Jacobsson B, Brismar Wendel S. Obstetric anal sphincter injury after episiotomy in vacuum extraction: an epidemiological study using an emulated randomized trial approach. Bjog. 2021:Epub ahead of print. DOI 10.1111\/471-0528.16663.","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16663"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13538","article-title":"Operator experience affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum extraction deliveries","volume":"98","author":"Bergendahl","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0140","unstructured":"Graviditetsregistrets \u00e5rsrapport 2018 (https:\/\/www.medscinet.com\/gr\/uploads\/hemsida\/dokumentarkiv\/2018%20GR%20\u00e5rsrapport_2.0.pdf). 2019 ed. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Pregnancy Register, MedSciNet; 2019."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.03.004","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy\u2013a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland","volume":"136","author":"Macleod","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2014.08.009","article-title":"Evaluation of accuracy of mediolateral episiotomy incisions using a training model","volume":"31","author":"Silf","year":"2015","journal-title":"Midwifery."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03901-4","article-title":"Episcissors-60\u2122 and obstetrics anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"31","author":"Divakova","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017_b0160","first-page":"251","article-title":"Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(\u00ae)","volume":"8","author":"Sawant","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med Devices (Auckl)"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211521010162?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211521010162?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:54:45Z","timestamp":1759557285000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211521010162"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["S0301211521010162"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Attitudes and knowledge regarding episiotomy use and technique in vacuum extraction: A web-based survey among doctors in Sweden","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}