{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T21:43:22Z","timestamp":1769204602211,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,4]],"date-time":"2022-03-04T19:54:50Z","timestamp":1646423690000},"page":"1-5","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Fetal growth restriction with abnormal individual biometric parameters at second trimester ultrasound is associated with small for gestational age neonate at delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"272","author":[{"given":"Chelsea A.","family":"DeBolt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Minhazur","family":"Sarker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Natalie","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elianna","family":"Kaplowitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ayisha","family":"Buckley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joanne","family":"Stone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Angela","family":"Bianco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e97-e109.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003070"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4341-9","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge","volume":"295","author":"Nardozza","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.007","article-title":"Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study","volume":"208","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002209","article-title":"Early second-trimester fetal growth restriction and adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"130","author":"Temming","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2243","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14577","article-title":"Significance and outcomes of fetal growth restriction below the 5th percentile compared to the 5th to 10th percentiles on midgestation growth ultrasonography","volume":"37","author":"Zhang-Rutledge","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1159\/000365814","article-title":"Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas","volume":"80","author":"Esinler","year":"2015","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0040","first-page":"1","article-title":"The clinical significance of an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile: a comparison of outcomes of <5th vs 5th-9th percentile","volume":"217","author":"Miynarczyk","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2012.04.004","article-title":"Birth weight- and fetal weight-growth restriction: impact on neurodevelopment","volume":"88","author":"Streimish","year":"2012","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, femur measurements: a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2431-13-59","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants","volume":"13","author":"Fenton","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pediatr"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.02040","article-title":"Third-trimester fetal biometry and neonatal outcomes in term and preterm deliveries","volume":"35","author":"Sheth","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1935","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2012.31.12.1935","article-title":"Isolated short femur length on second-trimester sonography: a marker for fetal growth restriction and other adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"31","author":"Goetzinger","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) consult series #52: diagnosis and Management of Fetal Growth Restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223:B2\u2013B17.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0075","unstructured":"Pressman K, Odibo L, Duncan O, A O. Impact of Using Abdominal Circumference Independently in the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction [published online ahead of print Mar 6, 2021. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;10:1002 15690."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20854","article-title":"Validation of Delphi procedure consensus criteria for defining fetal growth restriction","volume":"56","author":"Molina","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(76)90748-1","article-title":"A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America","volume":"126","author":"Brenner","year":"1976","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0095","first-page":"624","article-title":"Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California","volume":"59","author":"Williams","year":"1982","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00386-X","article-title":"A United States national reference for fetal growth","volume":"87","author":"Alexander","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000345","article-title":"A revised birth weight reference for the United States","volume":"124","author":"Duryea","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3273","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.15063","article-title":"Comparing diagnosis of fetal growth restriction and the potential impact on management and outcomes using different growth curves","volume":"38","author":"Strassberg","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23688","article-title":"Third-trimester growth diversity in small fetuses classified as appropriate-for-gestational age or small-for-gestational age at birth","volume":"58","author":"Deter","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1395849","article-title":"Second trimester growth velocities: assessment of fetal growth potential in SGA singletons","volume":"32","author":"Deter","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211522002342?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211522002342?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:55:50Z","timestamp":1759557350000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211522002342"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"references-count":24,"alternative-id":["S0301211522002342"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Fetal growth restriction with abnormal individual biometric parameters at second trimester ultrasound is associated with small for gestational age neonate at delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}