{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,5]],"date-time":"2025-10-05T00:29:23Z","timestamp":1759624163560,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,7]],"date-time":"2022-03-07T02:09:37Z","timestamp":1646618977000},"page":"69-72","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Impact of suspected late-onset fetal growth restriction on obstetrical interventions and perinatal outcomes at term; a retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"272","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Neefjes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"E.S.","family":"van den Akker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Jacod","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"318","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0005","first-page":"e1","article-title":"The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus","volume":"207","author":"Pilliod","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"376","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0010","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Risk of stillbirth after 37 weeks in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age foetuses","volume":"208","author":"Trudell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9946","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61490-2","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies","volume":"213","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.010","article-title":"The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application","volume":"218","author":"Kiserud","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.011","article-title":"Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial\/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age","volume":"219","author":"Blue","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14725","article-title":"The Hadlock method is superior to newer methods for the prediction of the birth weight percentile","volume":"38","author":"Blue","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.012","article-title":"Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas for calculating estimated fetal weight in a preterm population in France","volume":"219","author":"Monier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10008","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0055","article-title":"Effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasonography to Reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancy (the IRIS study): nationwide, pragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial","volume":"367","author":"Henrichs","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20391","article-title":"Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35\u201337 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"54","author":"Akolekar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.043","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"220","author":"Caradeux","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20258","article-title":"Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks\u2019 gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates","volume":"53","author":"Cobianu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14915","article-title":"Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks\u2019 gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE)","volume":"46","author":"Roma","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5225","article-title":"New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study","volume":"31","author":"Verburg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.12.023","article-title":"From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts","volume":"220","author":"Hoftiezer","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9694","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labour induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211522002457?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211522002457?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:57:07Z","timestamp":1759557427000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211522002457"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"references-count":20,"alternative-id":["S0301211522002457"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Impact of suspected late-onset fetal growth restriction on obstetrical interventions and perinatal outcomes at term; a retrospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.012","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}