{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T16:45:04Z","timestamp":1791909904206,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,15]],"date-time":"2022-12-15T20:37:04Z","timestamp":1671136624000},"page":"49-53","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"special_numbering":"C","title":["The effect of uterine volume on surgical outcomes following uterine preserving apical prolapse repair"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"281","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2668-1612","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Henry H.","family":"Chill","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adiel","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aharon","family":"Dick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adi","family":"Reuveni-Salzman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Shveiky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","article-title":"Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"24","author":"Barber","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) \/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP)","volume":"27","author":"Haylen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0015","first-page":"CD004014","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women","volume":"4","author":"Maher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf","article-title":"Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States","volume":"122","author":"Wright","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000307","article-title":"Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?","volume":"28","author":"Gutman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000177","article-title":"What part does mesh play in urogenital prolapse management today?","volume":"25","author":"Costantini","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1513","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04563-3","article-title":"Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite\u2122 mesh system: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction","volume":"32","author":"Chill","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020","article-title":"Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review","volume":"267","author":"Azadi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","article-title":"Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines","volume":"219","author":"Meriwether","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"(Jefferis H, Jackson SR, Price N. Management of uterine prolapse: is hysterectomy necessary? The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2016;18: 17\u201323.","DOI":"10.1111\/tog.12220"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1984.3.7.289","article-title":"The inaccuracy of total uterine volume measurements: Sources of error and a proposed solution","volume":"3","author":"Kurtz","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13189","article-title":"Sonographic evaluation of uterine volume and its clinical importance","volume":"43","author":"Sheth","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0065","first-page":"00330","article-title":"The effect of age on surgical outcomes following uterine preserving surgery for treatment of apical prolapse","volume":"S1553\u20134650","author":"Chill","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15991","article-title":"Three-dimensional transvaginal sonographic assessment of uterine volume as preoperative predictor of need to morcellate in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"50","author":"Gerges","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McPencow AM, Erekson EA, Guess MK, Martin DK, Patel DA, Xu X. Cost-effectiveness of endometrial evaluation prior to morcellation in surgical procedures for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(1):22.e1-9.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.03.033"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","article-title":"Uterine-preserving POP surgery","volume":"24","author":"Gutman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211522006315?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211522006315?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:58:44Z","timestamp":1759557524000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211522006315"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"references-count":16,"alternative-id":["S0301211522006315"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The effect of uterine volume on surgical outcomes following uterine preserving apical prolapse repair","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.12.019","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}