{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,18]],"date-time":"2025-10-18T15:16:53Z","timestamp":1760800613210,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,3]],"date-time":"2024-02-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1706918400000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":339,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,26]],"date-time":"2023-01-26T02:58:36Z","timestamp":1674701916000},"page":"155-160","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Breech presentation induction compared to cephalic presentation: Effectiveness and characteristics"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"282","author":[{"given":"Florence","family":"Leblanc","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Myriam","family":"Khobzaoui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emeline","family":"Cailliau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Damien","family":"Subtil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Veronique","family":"Houfflin-Debarge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Charles","family":"Garabedian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Louise","family":"Ghesqui\u00e8re","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0005","unstructured":"Blondel B, Gonzalez L, Raynaud P. Enqu\u00eate nationale p\u00e9rinatale 2016. Les naissances et les \u00e9tablissements. Situation et \u00e9volution depuis 2010. INSERM; 2017 oct."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0010","first-page":"235","article-title":"Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes","volume":"50","author":"Glantz","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Reprod Med avr"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0015","first-page":"25","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor","volume":"56","author":"Vardo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Reprod Med f\u00e9vr"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.046","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies","volume":"221","author":"Grobman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibson KS, Waters TP, Bailit JL. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. sept 2014;211(3):249.e1-249.e16.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, Snowden JM, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstetr Gynecol d\u00e9c 2012;207(6):502.e1-502.e8.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.09.019"},{"issue":"9239","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol avr"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","article-title":"Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The international randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Whyte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstetr Gynecol sept"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00323.x","article-title":"Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital","volume":"112","author":"Pradhan","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG f\u00e9vr"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00386.x","article-title":"Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high?","volume":"83","author":"Ulander","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2017-0127","article-title":"Neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of 4 years according to the planned mode of delivery in term breech presentation: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study","volume":"46","author":"Macharey","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0070","unstructured":"[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice-Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Complications]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020;48(1):70\u201180."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2015-0426","article-title":"Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"45","author":"Burgos","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1159\/000010029","article-title":"Can Labor with Breech Presentation Be Induced?","volume":"46","author":"Fait","year":"1998","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.04.005","article-title":"Induced labour at term and breech presentation: Experience of a level IIB French maternity","volume":"46","author":"Jarniat","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod sept"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3853-4","article-title":"Induction of labor in breech presentations at term: a retrospective observational study","volume":"293","author":"Macharey","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet mars"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.03.008","article-title":"Induction of labour and breech presentation: experience of a French maternity ward","volume":"40","author":"Marzouk","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(01)00424-6","article-title":"Induction of labor in breech presentation","volume":"74","author":"Rojansky","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet ao\u00fbt"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.12.031","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes between induction of labor and spontaneous labor for term breech - A systemic review and meta analysis","volume":"222","author":"Sun","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol mars"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Welle\u2010Strand JAH, Tappert C, Eggeb\u00f8 TM. Induction of labor in breech presentations \u2010 a retrospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2 f\u00e9vr 2021;aogs.14083.","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14083"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sagf.2016.11.006","article-title":"Recommandations pour l\u2019administration d\u2019oxytocine au cours du travail spontan\u00e9. Texte court des recommandations","volume":"16","author":"Dupont","year":"2017","journal-title":"La Revue Sage-Femme f\u00e9vr"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.06.032","article-title":"The term breech presentation: Neonatal results and obstetric practices in France","volume":"125","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2006","journal-title":"Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol avr"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12333","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Misoprostol or dinoprostone","volume":"40","author":"Liu","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res avr"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(81)90030-7","article-title":"Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and breech presentation","volume":"11","author":"O\u2019Herlihy","year":"1981","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol avr"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0135","first-page":"632","article-title":"Comparison of obstetric prognosis of attempts of breech delivery: Spontaneous labor versus induced labor","volume":"46","author":"Breton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0140","first-page":"722","article-title":"Comparison of antepartum management of breech versus cephalic presentation","volume":"48","author":"Benzekri","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.02.008","article-title":"Quel est l\u2019impact de la rupture des membranes amniotiques sur le rythme cardiaque f\u0153tal au cours du travail spontan\u00e9 ?","volume":"48","author":"Peru","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017","article-title":"Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature","volume":"170","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2013","journal-title":"Europ J Obstetr Gynecol Reproduct Biol sept"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14256","article-title":"Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"124","author":"Du","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0160","first-page":"778","article-title":"Cord blood acid-base values in breech-presenting infants born vaginally","volume":"78","author":"Christian","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0165","first-page":"182","article-title":"Umbilical cord blood acid-base values in uncomplicated term vaginal breech deliveries","volume":"77","author":"Daniel","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand f\u00e9vr"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1177","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01488.x","article-title":"Selective vaginal breech delivery at term - still an option: Vaginal breech delivery at term","volume":"91","author":"Toivonen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.04.003","article-title":"Is trial of labor harmful in breech delivery? A cohort comparison for breech and vertex presentations","volume":"46","author":"Adjaoud","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod mai"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0180","first-page":"11","article-title":"Per-partum risk factors of neonatal acidemia in planned vaginal delivery for fetuses in breech presentation","volume":"47","author":"Vannerum","year":"2019","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol janv"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00822-6","article-title":"Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial","volume":"189","author":"Su","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol sept"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.05.003","article-title":"Evaluation of a decision protocol for type of delivery of infants in breech presentation at term","volume":"158","author":"Michel","year":"2011","journal-title":"Europ J Obstetr Gynecol Reproduct Biol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523000398?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523000398?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T06:00:56Z","timestamp":1759557656000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211523000398"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"references-count":38,"alternative-id":["S0301211523000398"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Breech presentation induction compared to cephalic presentation: Effectiveness and characteristics","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.030","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}