{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T10:15:45Z","timestamp":1784715345042,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,4]],"date-time":"2024-04-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1712188800000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":308,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]],"date-time":"2023-04-01T19:18:20Z","timestamp":1680376700000},"page":"7-11","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Mode of delivery after labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone versus oral misoprostol for women with unfavorable cervix at term"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"285","author":[{"given":"Sol\u00e8ne","family":"Jolivet","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M\u00e9lanie","family":"Delavallade","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antoine","family":"Giraud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C\u00e9line","family":"Chauleur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4408-6075","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tiphaine","family":"Raia-Barjat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0005","unstructured":"Thomas J, Kavanagh J, Kelly A. RCOG Evidence-based Clinical Guidelines Induction of labour. 2001."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30842-2","article-title":"Induction of labour","volume":"35","author":"Leduc","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0015","article-title":"French National Perinatal Survey: main results in 2021 about medical practices","author":"Cinelli","year":"2022","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"46","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0020","first-page":"701","article-title":"National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from to 2016: results from the French National Perinatal Surveys","volume":"2017","author":"Blondel","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3","article-title":"The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"286","author":"Teixeira","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vrouenraets FPJM, Roumen FJME, Dehing CJG, van den Akker ESA, Aarts MJB, Scheve EJT. Bishop Score and Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women: Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:690\u20117.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0035","unstructured":"R\u00e9sum\u00e9 des Caract\u00e9ristiques du Produit [Internet]. [cit\u00e9 22 sept 2021]. Disponible sur: http:\/\/agence-prd.ansm.sante.fr\/php\/ecodex\/rcp\/R0227000.htm."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0040","unstructured":"CT-16829_ANGUSTA_PIC_INS_Avis2_CT16829.pdf [Internet]. [cit\u00e9 22 sept 2021]. Disponible sur: https:\/\/www.has-sante.fr\/upload\/docs\/evamed\/CT-16829_ANGUSTA_PIC_INS_Avis2_CT16829.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.11.006","article-title":"Labour induction practices in France: A population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units","volume":"47","author":"Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0050","first-page":"475","article-title":"Induction of labour with oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol: a before-after study","volume":"50","author":"Duvillier","year":"2022","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0055","first-page":"229","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25\u03bcg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term","volume":"50","author":"Bagory","year":"2022","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0060","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring","volume":"12","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cardiotocography"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0065","unstructured":"Protocole_!Septembre_2020.pdf [Internet]. [cit\u00e9 17 sept 2021]. Disponible sur: https:\/\/www.chu-st-etienne.fr\/Reseaux\/Elena\/Pro\/Protocoles\/Accouchement\/Declenchement_du_travail\/Protocole_!Septembre_2020.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","article-title":"Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis","volume":"49","author":"Crane","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-2770-0","article-title":"Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets","volume":"20","author":"Eriksson","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Z. Alfirevic N. Aflaifel A. Weeks Oral misoprostol for induction of labour Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD001338.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001338.pub3"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kerr RS, Kumar N, Williams MJ, Cuthbert A, Aflaifel N, Haas DM, et al. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;6:CD014484.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD014484"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38729.513819.63","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial","volume":"332","author":"Dodd","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1038\/s41372-020-00888-5","article-title":"Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 versus E2: a comparison of outcomes","volume":"41","author":"Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0100","first-page":"10","article-title":"Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term","volume":"10","author":"Chitrakar","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Nepal Health Res Counc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.033","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor","volume":"210","author":"Rouzi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1268","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13667","article-title":"Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert","volume":"98","author":"Maggi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523001355?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523001355?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:59:27Z","timestamp":1759557567000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211523001355"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"references-count":22,"alternative-id":["S0301211523001355"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Mode of delivery after labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone versus oral misoprostol for women with unfavorable cervix at term","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.046","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}