{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T19:25:46Z","timestamp":1790623546482,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,26]],"date-time":"2023-04-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682467200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009780","name":"Region Sk\u00e5ne","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009780","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,26]],"date-time":"2023-04-26T11:57:11Z","timestamp":1682510231000},"page":"148-152","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"special_numbering":"C","title":["CTG interpretation templates affect residents\u2019 decision making"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"285","author":[{"given":"Frida","family":"Ekeng\u00e5rd","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monika","family":"Cardell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Herbst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0005","first-page":"159","article-title":"Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring","volume":"25","author":"Rooth","year":"1987","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0010","unstructured":"Grunewald C, Schultz T. Projekt S\u00e4ker F\u00f6rlossningsv\u00e5rd \u2013 ett nationellt tv\u00e4rprofessionellt samarbete f\u00f6r en s\u00e4krare f\u00f6rlossning2011. Available from: https:\/\/www.sfog.se\/media\/92068\/slutrapport_saeker_foerlossning.pdf."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography","volume":"131","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0020","unstructured":"Holzmann M. Nya svenska svenska riktlinjer f\u00f6r CTG tolkning under f\u00f6rlossning2017. Available from: https:\/\/www.sfog.se\/media\/305969\/info_ctg.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0025","first-page":"100120","article-title":"Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor","volume":"9","author":"Ekeng\u00e5rd","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X"},{"issue":"25","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4853","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1869931","article-title":"Impaired validity of the new FIGO and Swedish CTG classification templates to identify fetal acidosis in the first stage of labor","volume":"35","author":"Ekeng\u00e5rd","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0035","first-page":"508","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of the FIGO and the 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems in the detection of neonatal acidemia","volume":"34","author":"Marti Gamboa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13277","article-title":"New FIGO and Swedish intrapartum cardiotocography classification systems incorporated in the fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN) interpretation algorithm: agreements and discrepancies in cardiotocography classification and evaluation of significant ST events","volume":"97","author":"Olofsson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1494148","article-title":"Identifying newborns with umbilical cord blood metabolic acidosis by intrapartum cardiotography combined with fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN): comparison of the new and old FIGO systems to classify cardiotocograms","volume":"33","author":"Olofsson","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zamora Del Pozo C, Ch\u00f3liz Ezquerro M, Mej\u00eda I, et al. Diagnstic capacity and interobserver variability in FIGO, ACOG, NICE and Chandraharan cardiotocographic guidelines to predict neonatal acidemia. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2021:1-9.","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1986479"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1549","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14201","article-title":"Time to reconsider: have the 2015 FIGO and 2017 Swedish intrapartum cardiotocogram classifications led us from Charybdis to Scylla?","volume":"100","author":"Olofsson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e3283505b3c","article-title":"Human factors affecting the interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings: an update","volume":"24","author":"Santo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.017","article-title":"Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring","volume":"205","author":"Rei","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1307","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08187.x","article-title":"Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision","volume":"106","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0075","unstructured":"SFOG. CTG och foster\u00f6vervakning. Sweden: CTG-utbildning; 2017 [cited 2022 2022-09-29]. Available from: http:\/\/ctgutbildning.se."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2012.031","article-title":"Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic","volume":"22","author":"McHugh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Biochemia medica"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14296","article-title":"Implementation of a revised classification for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring and association to birth outcome: A national cohort study","volume":"101","author":"Jonsson","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680109400507","article-title":"Reducing risk by improving standards of intrapartum fetal care","volume":"94","author":"Young","year":"2001","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01602.x","article-title":"Severe asphyxia due to delivery-related malpractice in Sweden 1990\u20132005","volume":"115","author":"Berglund","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2011.10.001","article-title":"The impact of a computer assisted learning programme on the ability to interpret cardiotochography. A before and after study","volume":"3","author":"Millde-Luthander","year":"2012","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Healthc"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13171","article-title":"Cardiotocography interpretation skills and the association with size of maternity unit, years of obstetric work experience and healthcare professional background: a national cross-sectional study","volume":"96","author":"Thellesen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1258","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13666","article-title":"The impact of a national cardiotocography education program on neonatal and maternal outcomes: A historical cohort study","volume":"98","author":"Thellesen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"926","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03021.x","article-title":"Evaluation and impact of cardiotocography training programmes: a systematic review","volume":"118","author":"Pehrson","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2006.057","article-title":"Intrapartum cardiotocography \u2013 the dilemma of interpretational variation","volume":"34","author":"Palomaki","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03003.x","article-title":"Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians' interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph","volume":"118","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0130","first-page":"2208","article-title":"Does knowledge of fetal outcome influence the interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocography and subsequent clinical management?","volume":"123","author":"Reif","year":"2016","journal-title":"A multicentre European study Bjog"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00008","article-title":"Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care","volume":"142","author":"Choudhry","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1111\/jep.12368","article-title":"Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians","volume":"21","author":"Hruban","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1159\/000475927","article-title":"The \u201cFetal Reserve Index\u201d: Re-engineering the interpretation and responses to fetal heart rate patterns","volume":"43","author":"Eden","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523001719?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523001719?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T06:01:21Z","timestamp":1759557681000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211523001719"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"references-count":29,"alternative-id":["S0301211523001719"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"CTG interpretation templates affect residents\u2019 decision making","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.022","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}