{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T19:55:47Z","timestamp":1785614147393,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,28]],"date-time":"2023-08-28T20:26:59Z","timestamp":1693254419000},"page":"108-128","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Safety of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"289","author":[{"given":"Cristina","family":"Taliento","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Margherita","family":"Manservigi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mara","family":"Tormen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rosaria","family":"Cappadona","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Irene","family":"Piccolotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefano","family":"Salvioli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gennaro","family":"Scutiero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pantaleo","family":"Greco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.12.005","article-title":"Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor","volume":"88","author":"Langenegger","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0010","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2017","volume":"67","author":"Martin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0020","first-page":"386","article-title":"107: Induction of labor","volume":"114","author":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12711","article-title":"Does the ARRIVE trial merit changing obstetric practice? Some reflections four-year postrelease","volume":"50","author":"James-Conterelli","year":"2023","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000752","article-title":"Induction of labor: an overview of guidelines","volume":"75","author":"Tsakiridis","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10047.x","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality","volume":"105","author":"Hilder","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13546","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: a single-center randomized control trial","volume":"154","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08399.x","article-title":"Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel","volume":"106","author":"Danielian","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gaudineau A, Senat MV, Ehlinger V, Gallini A, Morin M, Olivier P, Roth E, Orusco E, Javoise S, Fort J, Lavergne C, Arnaud C, Rozenberg P, Vayssiere C; Groupe de Recherche en Obst\u00e9trique rt Gyn\u00e9cologie. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):542.e1\u2013542.e8. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.04.226. Epub 2021 Apr 19. PMID: 33887241.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.04.226"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.033","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor","volume":"210","author":"Rouzi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 13;2014(6):CD001338. doi: 10.1002\/14651858.CD001338.pub3. PMID: 24924489; PMCID: PMC6513439.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001338.pub3"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1997.tb00860.x","article-title":"A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction","volume":"23","author":"Herabutya","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2003.00066.x","article-title":"Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor","volume":"82","author":"Lokugamage","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-2-70","article-title":"Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: a randomized prospective study","volume":"27","author":"Papanikolaou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.01.038","article-title":"Influence of misoprostol or prostaglandin E(2) for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trial","volume":"116","author":"Megalo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1564","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2011.01575.x","article-title":"Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial","volume":"37","author":"Chaudhuri","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-006-0313-1","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"276","author":"Denguezli","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00673-X","article-title":"Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial","volume":"91","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1268","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13667","article-title":"Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert","volume":"98","author":"Maggi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01829.x","article-title":"Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone","volume":"115","author":"Calder","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0110","first-page":"372","article-title":"statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"2021","author":"Page","year":"2020","journal-title":"The BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang X, Yang A, Ma Q, Li X, Qin L, He T. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;294(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007\/s00404-015-4000-y. Epub 2016 Jan 8. PMID: 26746850; PMCID: PMC4981622.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-4000-y"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.13.4.254.259","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction","volume":"13","author":"Garry","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2001.tb01199.x","article-title":"Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for cervical priming prior to induction of labour in term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"41","author":"Rowlands","year":"2001","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1270","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02602.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming","volume":"117","author":"Tan","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0843-9","article-title":"Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial","volume":"280","author":"\u00d6zkan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70154-6","article-title":"A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"177","author":"Wing","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.150","article-title":"Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents","volume":"188","author":"Ramsey","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.108","article-title":"Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"188","author":"D\u00e4llenbach","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.03.014","article-title":"Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term","volume":"106","author":"Nagpal","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0160","unstructured":"Madaan M, Agrawal S, Puri M, Nigam A, Kaur H, Trivedi SS. Is low dose vaginal misoprostol better than dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):OC31-4. doi: 10.7860\/JCDR\/2014\/8101.4906. Epub 2014 Sep 20. PMID: 25386492; PMCID: PMC4225944."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0165","first-page":"759","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"15","author":"Saxena","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1341-8076.2003.00091.x","article-title":"Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"29","author":"Agarwal","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2000.0790121065.x","article-title":"A randomized prospective study of misoprostol and dinoproston for induction of labor","volume":"79","author":"Belfrage","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-006-0258-4","article-title":"A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction","volume":"275","author":"Sifakis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00496.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term","volume":"112","author":"Gregson","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1067","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70016-4","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"177","author":"Gottschall","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70503-X","article-title":"Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor","volume":"181","author":"Nunes","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0200","first-page":"1255","article-title":"Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone","volume":"108","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00595.x","article-title":"Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term","volume":"18","author":"Pandis","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91340-8","article-title":"Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison","volume":"173","author":"Chuck","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0227245","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0227245","article-title":"Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial","volume":"15","author":"Young","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70006-1","article-title":"A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor","volume":"177","author":"Surbek","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.00010.x","article-title":"A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction","volume":"111","author":"van Gemund","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152341.31873.d9","article-title":"Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"105","author":"Meyer","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0235","first-page":"201","article-title":"Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"99","author":"le Roux","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00107.x","article-title":"A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term","volume":"111","author":"Shetty","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.07.025","article-title":"Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes","volume":"235","author":"Rankin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.03.014","article-title":"Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"202","author":"Austin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12333","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"40","author":"Liu","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1297","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1046828","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Wang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382_b0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD000941. doi: 10.1002\/14651858.CD000941.pub2. PMID: 20927722; PMCID: PMC7061246.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000941.pub2"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523006887?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523006887?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T06:01:50Z","timestamp":1759557710000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211523006887"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]},"references-count":53,"alternative-id":["S0301211523006887"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Safety of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}