{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T23:23:17Z","timestamp":1794007397599,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,1]],"date-time":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704067200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,1]],"date-time":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704067200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,29]],"date-time":"2023-11-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1701216000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,21]],"date-time":"2023-11-21T02:52:23Z","timestamp":1700535143000},"page":"201-209","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":49,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines implementation in cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"292","author":[{"given":"Beatriz","family":"Pinho","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ant\u00f3nia","family":"Costa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e005671","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000325","article-title":"The Future of Cesarean Delivery Rates in the United States","volume":"60","author":"Clapp","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1367","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-07386-0","article-title":"Economic consequences of caesarean section delivery: evidence from a household survey in Tanzania","volume":"21","author":"Binyaruka","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-018-3570-3","article-title":"Caesarean section rate and postnatal bed occupancy: a retrospective study replacing assumptions with evidence","volume":"18","author":"Roy","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1741-7015-8-71","article-title":"Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004\u20132008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health","volume":"8","author":"Souza","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"issue":"7628","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1025","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39363.706956.55","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study","volume":"335","author":"Villar","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.11606\/S1518-8787.2017051000389","article-title":"Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Mascarello","year":"2017","journal-title":"Rev Saude Publica"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/s40748-017-0051-3","article-title":"Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery: epidemiology, prevention and treatment","volume":"3","author":"Kawakita","year":"2017","journal-title":"Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"860","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2017.0350","article-title":"The History of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and the ERAS Society","volume":"27","author":"Ljungqvist","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clnu.2005.02.002","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection","volume":"24","author":"Fearon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Nutr"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clnu.2010.01.004","article-title":"The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"29","author":"Varadhan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Nutr"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.015","article-title":"Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1)","volume":"219","author":"Wilson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.006","article-title":"Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2)","volume":"219","author":"Caughey","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.04.012","article-title":"Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3)","volume":"221","author":"Macones","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1177\/1524839919893361","article-title":"A Review of the PubMed PICO Tool: Using Evidence-Based Practice in Health Education","volume":"21","author":"Brown","year":"2020","journal-title":"Health Promot Pract"},{"issue":"oct18 2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","article-title":"The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"343","author":"Higgins","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0090","unstructured":"Wells GA, Shea B, O\u2019Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford; 2000."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","article-title":"Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample","volume":"5","author":"Hozo","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000004495","article-title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Standard of Care Recovery for Emergency Cesarean Deliveries at Mbarara Hospital","volume":"130","author":"Baluku","year":"2020","journal-title":"Uganda Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.2147\/TCRM.S244039","article-title":"The Advantage of Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Acute Pain Management During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","volume":"16","author":"Pan","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ther Clin Risk Manag"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.10.009","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery at cesarean delivery to reduce postoperative length of stay: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"222","author":"Teigen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0115","unstructured":"Gupta S, Gupta A, Baghel AS, Sharma K, Choudhary S, Choudhary V. Enhanced recovery after cesarean protocol versus traditional protocol in elective cesarean section: A prospective observational study."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003406","article-title":"Enhanced Recovery After Surgery to Change Process Measures and Reduce Opioid Use After Cesarean Delivery: A Quality Improvement Initiative","volume":"134","author":"Hedderson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"S1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-021-01461-6","article-title":"Enhanced Recovery Pathway as a Tool in Reducing Post-operative Hospital Stay After Caesarean Section, Compared to Conventional Care in COVID Era-A Pilot Study","volume":"71","author":"Mangala","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-1732378","article-title":"The Association between Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathway with Standardized Discharge Prescriptions and Opioid Use and Pain Experience after Cesarean Delivery","volume":"38","author":"McCoy","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.041","article-title":"An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for cesarean delivery decreases hospital stay and cost","volume":"221","author":"Fay","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2019.08.004","article-title":"Evaluation of the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation on maternal outcomes following elective cesarean delivery","volume":"43","author":"Kleiman","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/s13741-021-00209-0","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and postoperative opioid prescribing for cesarean delivery: an interrupted time series analysis","volume":"10","author":"Langnas","year":"2021","journal-title":"Perioper Med (Lond)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2020.01.005","article-title":"Impact of an enhanced recovery program for cesarean delivery on postoperative opioid use","volume":"43","author":"Lester","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"07","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1721075","article-title":"Post-Cesarean Opioid Use after Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol","volume":"38","author":"MacGregor","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004023","article-title":"Improved Outcomes With an Enhanced Recovery Approach to Cesarean Delivery","volume":"136","author":"Mullman","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0165","first-page":"387","article-title":"Comparative study about enhanced recovery after cesarean section: What benefits, what risks?","volume":"45","author":"Rousseau","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"S 01","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e215","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1709456","article-title":"Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Cesarean Delivery Decreases Length of Hospital Stay and Opioid Consumption: A Quality Improvement Initiative","volume":"38","author":"Shinnick","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-04105-9","article-title":"The successful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program among caesarean deliveries in Bhutan to reduce the postoperative length of hospital stay","volume":"21","author":"Tamang","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0180","article-title":"The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies","volume":"8","author":"Meng","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Med (Lausanne)"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.003","article-title":"Opioid prescribing patterns among postpartum women","volume":"219","author":"Badreldin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003087","article-title":"Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Scheduled Compared With Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery","volume":"133","author":"Prabhu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-013-2441-7","article-title":"A qualitative study assessing the barriers to implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery","volume":"38","author":"Lyon","year":"2014","journal-title":"World J Surg"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523008369?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211523008369?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T06:04:22Z","timestamp":1759557862000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211523008369"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1]]},"references-count":39,"alternative-id":["S0301211523008369"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines implementation in cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.028","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}