{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,15]],"date-time":"2026-01-15T23:34:16Z","timestamp":1768520056559,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,1]],"date-time":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1717200000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,1]],"date-time":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1717200000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,1]],"date-time":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1717200000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,1]],"date-time":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1717200000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,1]],"date-time":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1717200000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,1]],"date-time":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1717200000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,1]],"date-time":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1717200000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,9]],"date-time":"2024-04-09T04:34:04Z","timestamp":1712637244000},"page":"126-131","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"C","title":["A simulation study to assess the potential benefits of MRI-based fetal weight estimation as a second-line test for suspected macrosomia"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"297","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5251-6023","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dominique A.","family":"Badr","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andrew","family":"Carlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michel","family":"Boulvain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Caroline","family":"Kadji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mieke M.","family":"Cannie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jacques C.","family":"Jani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Leonardo","family":"Gucciardo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1). https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/greenjournal\/Fulltext\/2020\/01000\/Macrosomia__ACOG_Practice_Bulletin,_Number_216.50.aspx.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003606"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90424-P","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing \u22654000 grams be delivered by cesarean section?","volume":"165","author":"Langer","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20279","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"54","author":"Beta","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9987","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13517","article-title":"Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"123","author":"Malin","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2017.134","article-title":"Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance\u2014the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound","volume":"37","author":"Aviram","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1511697","article-title":"Accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight in suspected macrosomia: the likelihood of overestimating and underestimating the true birthweight","volume":"33","author":"Zafman","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.08.001","article-title":"Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study","volume":"226","author":"Kadji","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Badr DA, Cannie MM, Kadji C, Kang X, Carlin A, Jani JC. The impact of different growth charts on birthweight prediction: obstetric ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. Published online August 12, 2023:101123. doi:10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.101123.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.101123"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boulvain M, Thornton J. Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;(3). doi:10.1002\/14651858.CD000938.pub3.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000938.pub3"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.27643","article-title":"Timing of induction of labor in suspected macrosomia: retrospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis","author":"Badr","year":"2024","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obst Gyn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.05.047","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"203","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0060","series-title":"Reducing macrosomia-related birth complications in primigravid women: ultrasound and MRI-based models","author":"Badr","year":"2023"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0070","series-title":"The ethics of induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparas in research and clinical practice","author":"Azria","year":"2023"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1159\/000448950","article-title":"The use of a software-assisted method to estimate fetal weight at and near term using magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"41","author":"Kadji","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5530","article-title":"The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of birthweight","volume":"40","author":"Carlin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Badr DA, Cannie MM, Kadji C, Kang X, Carlin A, Jani JC. Performance of fetal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in predicting birthweight according to the test-to-delivery interval: A cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 292:138-146.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.11.025"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524001763?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524001763?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,8]],"date-time":"2025-09-08T02:34:14Z","timestamp":1757298854000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211524001763"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]},"references-count":18,"alternative-id":["S0301211524001763"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A simulation study to assess the potential benefits of MRI-based fetal weight estimation as a second-line test for suspected macrosomia","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}